Skip to content
CoreGiving Co at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

CoreGiving Co

Engage in the charitable purpose of combating childhood hunger.

$4.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
86
Grants FY2024still arriving
26
States reached
$142k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$13M
02FY2024 · 86 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 86 grants below total $3,375,811, the rows itemized in this filing. The $4,268,594 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $892,783 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k56 grants · $1.4M
  • $50k–250k26 grants · $2.0M
$26,079
Median grant
26
States reached
$886k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Mary's Food Bank Alliance$142,022
Second Harvest Food Bank Central Florida Inc$117,513
Central Texas Food Bank Inc$116,185
Food for Free Committee Inc$103,224
Los Angeles Regional Food Bank$98,225
Capital Area Food Bank$97,999
Tarrant Area Food Bank$87,623
North Texas Food Bank$87,623
Feeding America Riverside San Bernardino$76,372
Atlanta Community Food Bank$72,194
Urban Recipe Inc$72,194
Maui Food Bank$71,763
Alameda County Community Food Bank$69,320
San Francisco-Marin Food Bank$69,320
Oregon Food Bank$68,796
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $784k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%The River Fund New York Inc: $93k → 13%Metropolitan Ministries: $35k → 13%I-58 Mission: $20k → 8%The Nutley Family Service Bureau Pantry: $20k → 16%Food For Others: $25k → 6%St Vincent de Paul of Baltimore: $25k → 19%The River Fund New York Inc: $70k → 13%Metropolitan Ministries: $19k → 13%Nourish Up: $41k → 10%The Nutley Family Service Bureau Pantry: $10k → 16%St Vincent de Paul of Baltimore: $20k → 19%The River Fund New York Inc: $23k → 13%Friendship Trays Inc: $54k → 10%St Vincent de Paul of Baltimore: $16k → 19%Blessings in a Backpack: $22k → 15%The River Fund New York Inc: $15k → 13%Friendship Trays Inc: $31k → 10%Lawrenceville Co-Op: $25k → 9%Blessings in a Backpack: $17k → 15%Margaret Fuller Neighborhood House: $40k → 8%Friendship Trays Inc: $8k → 10%StreetWise Georgia: $25k → 9%Blessings in a Backpack: $10k → 15%Kids' Meals Inc: $38k → 16%Lawrenceville Co-Op: $10k → 9%Lost-n-Found Youth Inc: $10k → 13%Kids' Meals Inc: $23k → 16%StreetWise Georgia: $10k → 9%Kids' Meals Inc: $22k → 16%Kids' Meals Inc: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$13M · 81 repeat orgs$585k to everyone else

81 repeat relationships: 73 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

81
11

Total granted

$13M
$291k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+42%

Still filing today

96%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $295k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionHuman ServicesReligionPhilanthropyInternationalCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MAUI FOOD BANK INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $548k · revenue +138%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $508k · revenue +31%
  • FF
    FOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $433k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • JC
    Jacobs & Cushman Food Bank
    one grant, 2020 · $70k
  • SH
    SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA
    one grant, 2021 · $60k · revenue -47%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $30k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Food Bank for Larimer County

To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.

Food & Nutrition
2
Feeding America

Our mission is to advance change in America by ensuring equitable access to nutritious food for all in partnership with partner food banks, policymakers, supporters, and the communities we serve.

Food & Nutrition
3
Second Harvest Food Bank of Metrolina Inc

To feed people by soliciting and distributing food and other products through partner agencies and educating the community about the nature of and solutions to problems of hunger.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Food Bank for Central & Northeast Missouri

The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…

Food & Nutrition
5
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
6
Food Bank of the Albemarle

To fight hunger and poverty in northeastern north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
7
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
8
Food Bank of Eastern Michigan

The Food Bank of Eastern Michigan's mission is to be the Food Source for people in need. Partnering with organizations to feed the hungry, we advocate and build a community solution to a community problem. By leveraging an abundance of…

Food & Nutrition
9
Second Harvest Heartland

Second harvest heartland's mission is to end hunger together. in partnership with more than 1,000 food shelves and hunger-relief programs in minnesota and western wisconsin, we provided 143 million meals to neighbors last year.

Food & Nutrition
10
Harvest Hope Food Bank

Harvest hope is on a mission to eliminate hunger and food insecurity in south carolina. we rescue nutritious food from stores throughout the state and distribute it to food pantries, shelters, and soup kitchens. we operate programs that…

Food & Nutrition
11
Food Bank Association of New York State

The mission of feeding new york state is to lead a unified effort for a hunger-free state of new york. the mission of food banking is to obtain food and deliver it to emergency food programs. feeding new york state works to end hunger by…

Food & Nutrition
12
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northern Illinois Food Bank; the most unlike its peers is The Attic Youth Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
98/99
Grantees still filing
70/99
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAUI FOOD BANK INC: $547,892 · Food & NutritionMAUI FOOD BANK INCST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $508,132 · Food & NutritionST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCEFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC: $432,667 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INCCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $419,275 · Food & NutritionCentral Texas Food Bank IncGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $353,735 · Food & NutritionCITY HARVEST INC: $340,376 · Food & NutritionJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $338,026 · Food & NutritionFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $326,823 · Food & NutritionHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $278,995 · Food & NutritionTHREE SQUARE: $278,796 · Food & NutritionFEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES: $278,557 · Food & NutritionATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $262,943 · Food & Nutrition+38 more: $3,260,679 · Food & Nutrition+38 moreSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $555,805 · OtherSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL …LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $452,692 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANKALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $366,102 · OtherALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANKNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $324,122 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKNOURISHING HOPE: $284,751 · OtherNOURISHING HOPENORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $273,743 · OtherNORTHWEST HARVEST EMMTarrant Area Food Bank: $266,622 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY: $175,921 · OtherSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $160,884 · Other+27 more: $1,381,059 · Other+27 moreTHE RIVER FUND NEW YORK INC: $200,287 · Human ServicesNourish Up: $134,357 · Human ServicesKIDS' MEALS INC: $90,386 · Human ServicesST VINCENT DE PAUL OF BALTIMORE INC: $60,921 · Human ServicesMETROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC: $54,489 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $49,000 · Human ServicesMARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $40,000 · Human ServicesSTREETWISE GEORGIA INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesLAWRENCEVILLE COOPERATIVE MINISTRY INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesNUTLEY FAMILY SERVICE BUREAU: $30,000 · Human Services+3 more: $55,000 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $215,287 · Community ImprovementNEW YORK CARES INC: $126,750 · PhilanthropyHands on Atlanta Inc: $64,000 · PhilanthropyFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $110,594 · InternationalRISE AGAINST HUNGER INC: $15,500 · InternationalEDWARD G IRVIN FOUNDATION: $69,915 · Education
Food & Nutrition$7,626,896Other$4,241,701Human Services$784,440Community Improvement$215,287Philanthropy$190,750International$126,094Education$69,915

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC: $555,805 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAUI FOOD BANK INC: $547,892 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $508,132 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $452,692 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC: $432,667 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetCentral Texas Food Bank Inc: $419,275 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK: $366,102 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $353,735 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $340,376 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJACOBS & CUSHMAN SAN DIEGO FOOD BANK: $338,026 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING SAN DIEGO: $326,823 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $324,122 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE: $284,751 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHAWAII FOODBANK INC: $278,995 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHREE SQUARE: $278,796 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA RIVERSIDE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTIES: $278,557 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST HARVEST EMM: $273,743 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $266,622 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $262,943 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetURBAN RECIPE INC: $243,943 over 4y, 4.4% of budgetSHARE FOOD PROGRAM: $230,302 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $215,287 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RIVER FUND NEW YORK INC: $200,287 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNORTHERN ILLINOIS FOOD BANK: $194,751 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES: $192,807 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $190,302 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPalm Beach County Food Bank Inc: $187,701 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC: $182,420 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF ORANGE COUNTY: $175,921 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING SOUTH FLORIDA INC: $163,701 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK: $160,884 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $146,960 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $140,652 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON FOOD BANK: $140,004 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNourish Up: $134,357 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $127,390 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CARES INC: $126,750 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES: $123,738 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $117,555 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEED MY STARVING CHILDREN INC: $110,594 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $110,044 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEVERY MEAL: $105,943 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $104,900 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFood Bank of Northern Nevada Inc: $90,780 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKIDS' MEALS INC: $90,386 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFEED MORE INC: $87,401 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA FOOD BANK: $77,851 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $76,965 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Atlanta Community Foo…Assurant FoundationMcKesson Foundation I…Enterprise Holdings F…United Way of Greater…Charities Aid Foundat…America's CharitiesAtl Fdn-W Peters MainTr Uw Charles I BrananThe Community Foundat…Community Foundation …Verizon Foundation
Atlanta Community Food Bank IncGA18.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Atlanta Community Food Bank Inc · Assurant Foundation · McKesson Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · America's Charities · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · Verizon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization CoreGiving Co funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from CoreGiving Co. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • St Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Nutley Family Service Bureau: 6% of income from government
  • Feeding South Florida Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Food for Free Committee Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Metropolitan Ministries Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for Life Network Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
45report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 105 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on CoreGiving’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home