Skip to content
Coordinated Behavioral Care Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Coordinated Behavioral Care Inc

Providers and advocacy communities to improve the health outcomes ofmedicaid patients diagnosed with chronic health and behavioral healthconditions.

$969k
Granted FY2019
11
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$117k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2019 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2019

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $919k
$117,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$52M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NADAP$117,000
POST GRADUATE CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH$117,000
COMMUNITY ACCESS$117,000
PROJECT HOSPITALITY$117,000
SAMARITAN DAYTOP VILLAGE$117,000
OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES$117,000
SERVICES FOR THE UNDERSERVED$117,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES$50,000
JCCA$50,000
NEW YORK PSYCHOTHERAPY AND COUNSELING CENTER$25,000
JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES INC$25,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $242k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%JCCA: $50k → 20%CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES: $50k → 20%JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDRENS SERVICES INC: $25k → 17%OHEL CHILDREN'S HOME AND FAMILY SERVICES: $117k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hamilton-Madison House Inc

Hamilton-madison house is a non-profit settlement house that has been the place for care and connection for the diverse populations of the lower east side since 1898. based in the lower east side but offering programming citywide, we…

Arts & Culture
2
Jewish Home Lifecare Manhattan

Jewish home lifecare (d/b/a the new jewish home, manhattan), is a not-for-profit organization committed to transforming eldercare for new yorkers so they can live meaningful lives in the place they call home.

Health
3
Brooklyn Community Housing and Services

To provide short term, transitional and permanent housing, homelessness prevention, personalized case management, mental health care, on-site nursing, vocational training, substance abuse counseling, recreational activities and other vital…

Human Services
4
Pibly Residential Programs Inc

Pibly's mission embraces the belief that the needs of its consumers can be met and their goals can be achieved. pibly strives to expand opportunities for people living with mental health challenges by delivering person centered services…

—
5
Visiting Nurse Service of New York Home Care Ii

Vns health home care is part of one of the nation's largest nonprofit home and community-based health care organizations. we help people live, age, and heal where they feel most comfortable. please refer to schedule o for additional…

Health
6
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
7
Housing Options and Geriatric Association Resources Inc

To assist societys most disenfranchised; the elderly, seriously mentally ill adults, the homeless, people living with AIDS and the physically challenged by promoting, fostering and providing the highest quality of housing and services in a…

Health
8
Center for Alternative Sentencing and Employment Services Inc

Cases' mission is to increase public safety through innovative services that reduce crime and incarceration, improve behavioral health, promote recovery and rehabilitation, and create opportunities for success in the community. we believe…

—
9
Transitional Services of New York Inc

The agency operates community residences and supported housing programs and provides other outpatient, vocational rehabilitation & clinical services to individuals with mental illness.

Human Services
10
The New York Gracie Square Hospital Inc

Our mission is to provide the highest-quality, state-of-the-art mental health and chemical dependency treatment in a warm, healing environment. our caring, compassionate team prepares our patients to return to their families and…

Health
11
Argus Community Inc

Argus community's mission is to provide innovative programs which help severely disadvantaged teens and adults to free themselves from poverty and drug abuse and build new lives based on responsibility, work, and hope. argus provides a…

Health
12
Center for Comprehensive Health Practice Inc

The center for comprehensive health practice, inc. provides accessible, community-based treatment that integrates primary healthcare with substance use and behavioral health services for all children, adolescents, adults, and families…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Access Inc; the most unlike its peers is Catholic Charities Neighborhood Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

POSTGRADUATE CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $117,000 · OtherPOSTGRADUATE CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTHSUS-MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMS INC: $117,000 · OtherSUS-MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMS INCNATIONAL ASSOCIATION ON DRUG ABUSE PROBLEMS INC: $117,000 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION ON DRUG ABUSE PROBLEMS INCPROJECT HOSPITALITY INC: $117,000 · OtherPROJECT HOSPITALITY INCCOMMUNITY ACCESS INC: $117,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY ACCESS INCSAMARITAN DAYTOP VILLAGE INC: $117,000 · HealthSAMARITAN DAYTOP VILLAGE INCNEW YORK PSYCHOTHERAPY AND COUNSELING CENTER: $25,000 · HealthNEW YORK PSYCHOTHERAPY AND COU…Ohel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $117,000 · Human ServicesOhel Childrens Home & Family…CATHOLIC CHARITIES NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES NEIGHBORH…JEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $50,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATIO…JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHI…
Other$468,000Health$259,000Human Services$242,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOhel Childrens Home & Family Services Inc: $117,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPOSTGRADUATE CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH: $117,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACCESS INC: $117,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION ON DRUG ABUSE PROBLEMS INC: $117,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetSAMARITAN DAYTOP VILLAGE INC: $117,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT HOSPITALITY INC: $117,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PSYCHOTHERAPY AND COUNSELING CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robin Hood FoundationThe Hyde and Watson F…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Network for GoodVanguard Charitable E…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Robin Hood FoundationNY13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coordinated Behavioral Care Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coordinated Behavioral Care Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Coordinated Behavioral Care’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home