Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cooper Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$227kEducation$50kArts & Culture$19kPhilanthropy$14kAnimals$13kHealth$11kHuman Services$11kYouth Development$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OUR FABULOUS VARIETY SHOW$2,850
Individual grant recipient$1,500
BROADWAY CARESEFA$750
ARF - ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $146k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%SEEDS OF LOVE: $101k → 8%SEEDS OF LOVE: $11k → 8%SEEDS OF LOVE: $11k → 8%SEEDS OF LOVE: $11k → 8%SEEDS OF LOVE: $8k → 8%SEEDS OF LOVE: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
MA
CA
VA
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$236k · 9 repeat orgs$130k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
16

Total granted

$236k
$130k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+24%

Still filing today

44%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $300 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SEEDS OF LOVE
    6× · 2017–2022 · $146k · revenue -73% · 34% of their budget
  • RS
    ROSS SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND
    3× · 2018–2020 · $26k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2017–2025 · $19k

Funded once

  • LC
    LIMITLESS CHILD INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2017 · $55k
  • GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +34%
  • KS
    KESWICK SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends for Animal Rescue Ny Inc

Friends for animal rescue ny, inc. is a nonprofit organization that furthers the interest of animals in the new york state area and improves their quality of life by supporting medical care, enrichment activities, training and…

Animals
2
Dogs in Danger Rescue Inc D/B/a East Coast Adoption Agency

A small rescue group operating in the new york area that only rescues dogs from high kill shelters and southern rescues. this means a majority of dogs admitted there are euthanized due to lack of space. we very rarely take in owner…

Animals
3
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
4
Veterinarians International Inc

Providing veterinary aid and education to improve the health and well-being of animals and their communities worldwide.

Health
5
Tender Loving Cats Inc

Reduce the population of homeless cats and kittens on Long Island, New York through trap-neuter-return and adoption.

Animals
6
Puppy Kitty Ny City Inc

Pknyc focuses primarily on homeless and abandoned street cats, kittens, dogs, puppies, and other small animals. pknyc practices neuter-return to help combat the growing population of feral cats in the nyc metro area.

Animals
7
Good World Animal Rescue and Protection Inc

The organization operates a shelter for over 600 dogs, over 100 cats, and 15 brown bears. The animals receive care and treatment by a core group of daily staff and veterinarians. Healthy dogs and cats fly to the US and CAN to be adopted.…

Animals
8
Transport Group Inc Dba Transport Group Theatre Company

Producing and developing plays and musicals.

Arts & Culture
9
Animal Lighthouse Rescue Inc

The rescue of stray dogs in puerto rico, called satos. our team of volunteers in new york city works closely with el faro de los animales, a no-kill shelter in humacao,pr. our mission is to better the quality of life for abandoned satos by…

Animals
10
Pet Adoption League of New York Inc
Animals
11
Happy Tails Dog Rescue Inc

The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…

Animals
12
Badass Animal Rescue Inc

Badass Animal Rescue is an animal welfare organization that rescues abused and abandoned dogs that are in danger of imminent death at rural high kill shelters in the American South and United States Virgin Islands. The organization…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Garden of Dreams Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Guatemala United for Animals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIMITLESS CHILD INTERNATIONAL: $55,000 · OtherLIMITLESS CHILD INTERNATIONALROSS SCHOOL ANNUAL FUND: $25,875 · OtherROSS SCHOOL ANNUAL FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $19,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKESWICK SCHOOL: $11,500 · OtherKESWICK SCHOOLTHE ROSS SCHOOL: $11,350 · OtherTHE ROSS SCHOOLThe Phoenix Foundation: $11,000 · OtherThe Phoenix FoundationThe Retreat in East Hampton: $5,275 · OtherBroadway CaresEFA: $5,266 · Other+8 more: $7,025 · OtherSEEDS OF LOVE: $145,940 · Human ServicesSEEDS OF LOVEGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · InternationalOUR FABULOUS VARIETY SHOW INC: $15,776 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN CLASS COMPANY INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureGUATEMALA UNITED FOR ANIMALS INC: $10,800 · AnimalsANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $550 · AnimalsTURTLE RESCUE OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $500 · AnimalsThe Rogosin Institute Inc: $10,000 · HealthHAMPTONS UNITED: $2,900 · PhilanthropyGARDEN OF DREAMS FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$151,391Human Services$145,940International$25,000Arts & Culture$17,776Animals$11,850Health$10,000Philanthropy$3,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEEDS OF LOVE: $145,940 over 6y, 34% of budgetGLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUR FABULOUS VARIETY SHOW INC: $15,776 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetGUATEMALA UNITED FOR ANIMALS INC: $10,800 over 2y, 16% of budgetThe Rogosin Institute Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAMPTONS UNITED: $2,900 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetMANHATTAN CLASS COMPANY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSPIRACTION USA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGARDEN OF DREAMS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURTLE RESCUE OF THE HAMPTONS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SEEDS OF LOVE ↗
  • Who funds GLOBALGIVING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OUR FABULOUS VARIETY SHOW INC ↗
  • Who funds GUATEMALA UNITED FOR ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Rogosin Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAMPTONS UNITED ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN CLASS COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRACTION USA ↗
  • Who funds GARDEN OF DREAMS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS INC ↗
  • Who funds TURTLE RESCUE OF THE HAMPTONS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cooper Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cooper Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cooper Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph