Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cooper Clark Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
112
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Recreation & Sports$1.0MPublic Safety & Disaster$788kArts & Culture$625kEducation$533kHuman Services$473kHealth$306kFood & Nutrition$293kCommunity Improvement$247kOther$0
02FY2025 · 112 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k73 grants · $204k
  • $10k–50k34 grants · $684k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $340k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$100,000
GENOA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT$62,280
Individual grant recipient$60,000
WALSH HEALTHCARE CENTER$60,000
Individual grant recipient$57,900
Individual grant recipient$44,611
Individual grant recipient$43,735
STRATTON SCHOOL DISTRICT$40,000
Individual grant recipient$40,000
CROW LUTHER CULTURAL EVENTS CENTER$37,500
COUNTRY LIVING LEARNING CENTER$30,000
Individual grant recipient$26,330
KARVAL COMMUNITY ALLIANCE$25,500
SEWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$25,000
BAKERS ARTS FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $278k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 53% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 12%SATANTA AGING PROGRAM INC: $48k → 10%RUSSEL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER: $15k → 12%SATANTA AGING PROGRAM: $20k → 10%KANSAS CHILDREN'S SERVICE LEAGUE: $5k → 12%SATANTA AGING PROGRAM: $20k → 10%SATANTA AGING PROGRAM INC: $13k → 10%KIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT: $50k → 14%COUNTRY LIVING LEARNING CENTER: $30k → 14%KIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT: $22k → 14%SEWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $25k → 14%KIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT: $10k → 14%KANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE: $10k → 14%PRAIRIE FAMILY CENTER: $5k → 11%PRAIRIE FAMILY CENTER: $1k → 11%PRAIRIE FAMILY CENTER: $1k → 11%PRAIRIE FAMILY CENTER: $1k → 11%PRAIRIE FAMILY CENTER: $1k → 11%PRAIRIE FAMILY CENTER: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.4M · 106 repeat orgs$2.2M to everyone else

106 repeat relationships: 77 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

106
109

Total granted

$3.4M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-1%
+8%

Still filing today

13%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $425k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterEducationCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KC
    KIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT
    3× · 2021–2025 · $82k · revenue +25%
  • LB
    LIBERAL BASEBALL ASSOCIATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $23k · revenue +180%
  • HC
    HASKELL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY Haskell County Historical Society
    2× · 2022–2023 · $16k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • SF
    STRATTON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
    one grant, 2023 · $100k
  • GS
    GOOD SAMARITAN SOCIETY
    one grant, 2021 · $75k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $75k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
2
The Cowley County Historical Society

The museum collects and preserves memorabilia of cowley county, kansas. the museum is open to the public during scheduled hours, and is staffed by a combination of volunteers and staff.

—
3
Sixty Plus Club of Sh Co Ks Inc

Senior center

—
4
Seward County Historical Society Seward County Historical

Provide and showcase historical information about Seward County.

—
5
Holt county historical society

Holt co history

Arts & Culture
6
Kansas Business Hall of Fame Inc
—
7
Hayslope Preservation Historic Fund

Public charity

—
8
Kansas Association of Conservation Districts

Engage in educational, scientific, and governmental efforts to conserve, develop, and improve the use of land, soil, water, plants, animals, and other natural resources within the state of kansas

Community Improvement
9
Scott County Historical Society Inc

Preservation study and collection of historical items

—
10
Kansas Farmers Union Inc

To support members in farming

—
11
Kansas Farmers Union Foundation Inc
Community Improvement
12
Tri-County Family Care Center Inc

The Center is a single point of entry for people from Otero Bent and Crowley counties with general and emergency needs to find the resources and services available to help them.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kansas Childrens Service League; the most unlike its peers is Bee Jay's Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 243 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
14/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WALSH HEALTHCARE CENTER: $198,940 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $193,086 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $186,213 · Other+173 more: $3,920,200 · Other+173 moreSTRATTON AREA FOUNDATION 2 INC: $326,075 · Recreation & SportsLIBERAL BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $22,500 · Recreation & SportsSATANTA AGING PROGRAM INC: $101,291 · Human ServicesKIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT: $82,000 · Human ServicesCOUNTRY LIVING LEARNING CENTER: $30,000 · Human ServicesSEWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesKANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE RUSSELL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesPrairie Family Center: $9,500 · Human ServicesSEWARD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $44,700 · Arts & CultureCROW-LUTHER CULTURAL EVENTS CENTER: $37,500 · Arts & CultureBAKER ARTS CENTER INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureRoundhouse Preservation Inc: $10,000 · Arts & CultureSMOKY HILLS PUBLIC TELEVISION CORP: $6,450 · Arts & CultureSTEPPING STONE SHELTER INC: $78,684 · Housing & ShelterTHE STRATTON AREA FOUNDATION I: $10,580 · Housing & ShelterPRAIRIE PINES: $7,283 · Housing & ShelterKarvel Community Alliance Inc: $48,500 · Community ImprovementThe Center Inc: $9,000 · Community ImprovementKIOWA COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $8,695 · Community ImprovementHIGH PLAINS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5,500 · Community ImprovementSEWARD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationKISMET PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $13,245 · EducationFALCONS BOOSTER CLUB INC: $5,000 · Education
Other$4,498,439Recreation & Sports$348,575Human Services$277,791Arts & Culture$108,650Housing & Shelter$96,547Community Improvement$71,695Education$68,245

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTRATTON AREA FOUNDATION 2 INC: $326,075 over 3y, 83% of budgetSATANTA AGING PROGRAM INC: $101,291 over 4y, 22% of budgetKIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT: $82,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetSTEPPING STONE SHELTER INC: $78,684 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetSEWARD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetKarvel Community Alliance Inc: $48,500 over 2y, 58% of budgetSEWARD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $44,700 over 2y, 18% of budgetGRANT COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $25,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetSEWARD COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $25,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSouthwest Medical Center: $23,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERAL BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $22,500 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetLIBERAL AREA RAPE CRISIS & dba LARC DVS: $18,847 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetHASKELL COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY Haskell County Historical Society: $15,690 over 2y, 12% of budgetKANSAS CHILDRENS SERVICE LEAGUE: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE RUSSELL CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKISMET PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $13,245 over 2y, 40% of budgetLITTLE LEADERS LEARNING & CARE CENTER: $12,670 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetTHE STRATTON AREA FOUNDATION I: $10,580 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetBEE JAY'S INC: $10,500 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetSanta Fe Trail Council Boy Scouts of America Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetFlagler Golf Club Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetBAKER ARTS CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetRoundhouse Preservation Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetPrairie Family Center: $9,500 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetThe Center Inc: $9,000 over 1y, 83% of budgetKIOWA COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $8,695 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSPARROW HOUSE MINISTRIES: $8,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetBLUE ROSE RANCH INC: $7,500 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetPRAIRIE PINES: $7,283 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSMOKY HILLS PUBLIC TELEVISION CORP: $6,450 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED METHODIST WESTERN KANSAS MEXICAN- AMERICAN MINISTRIES INC: $5,806 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH PLAINS HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSOUTHWEST GUIDANCE CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STRATTON AREA FOUNDATION 2 INC ↗
  • Who funds SATANTA AGING PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds KIT CARSON RURAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds STEPPING STONE SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SEWARD COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Karvel Community Alliance Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEWARD COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baughman FoundationKS41.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 7 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baughman Foundation · Rundell Charitable Foundation Trust · SEWARD COUNTY UNITED FUND dba SEWARD COUNTY UNITED WAY · Western Kansas Community Foundation · Finnup Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Foundation Inc · Sunflower Foundation Health Care for Kansans · Temple Hoyne Buell Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cooper Clark Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cooper Clark Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cooper Clark Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cooper Clark Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 243 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cooper Clark’s filings →

    More from the funding graph