· Public charity
Cook Inlet Tribal Council
Citc's (Cook Inlet Tribal Council) mission is to work in partnership with alaska native/american indian individuals to connect them to opportunities that fulfill their potential through education and training, child and family services, and recovery services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 19 grants below total $6,181,463 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $17,583,162 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $11,401,699 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $290k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $462k
- $250k+6 grants · $5.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Clare Swan Early Learning Cen | $2,594,266 |
| Alaska Native Justice Center | $1,713,670 |
| Anchorage Community Land Trus | $307,500 |
| Ninilchik Traditional Council | $286,109 |
| Kenaitze Indian Tribe | $260,882 |
| Alaska Injury Prevention Cent | $259,970 |
| Knik Tribal Council | $229,520 |
| Cook Inlet Lending Center | $95,000 |
| The CIRI Foundation | $85,000 |
| Chickaloon Village Traditiona | $52,681 |
| Native Village of Tyonek | $44,541 |
| Boys and Girls Club | $40,259 |
| Anchorage Museum | $40,000 |
| Facing Foster Care in Alaska | $37,759 |
| Alaska Federation of Natives | $35,168 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $160k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSClare Swan Early Learning Center6× · 2019–2024 · $15M · revenue +52% · 79% of their budget
- ANAlaska Native Justice Center4× · 2019–2022 · $3.3M · revenue +234%
- CICOOK INLET LENDING CENTER5× · 2017–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +409% · 28% of their budget
Funded once
- TTTYONEK TRIBAL CONSERVATION DISTRICTgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $127k · revenue +537%
- RARURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAMgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $82k · revenue +55%
- ACANCHORAGE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $65k · revenue +100%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Dedicated to strengthening the multi-disciplinary response to child abuse. We strive to ensure that professionals throughout Alaska are equipped to do the best job possible at holding offenders accountable and helping children and families…
Icc alaska exists as the unified voice and collective spirit of alaskan inuit, to promote, protect and advance inuit culture and society.
The alaska nannut co-management council (ancc) was established to represent the collective alaska native voice in polar bear co-management. ancc is a tribally authorized organization with membership consisting of the 15 tribes in alaska…
Building partnerships, building trails. Working to build trails across the state and build capacity for trail organizations.
The core purpose of AITRC is "traditional resource stewardship." The core values are "survival; protect and enhance subsistence resources; and partnerships." The vision statement is "our way of life and cultural tradition is unified and…
We engage, empower, and elect alaskans to stand up for our clean air and water, healthy communities, and a strong democracy.
The Chugach Regional Resources Commission (the Commission) was established for the purpose of providing formal advocacy to manage natural resources in ways consistent with the cultural traditions of the Chugach Native people.
to promote, support and advocate for Alaska agriculture
The mission of the alaska native health board is to promote the spiritual, physical, mental, social, and cultural well-being and pride of alaska native people.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alaska Native Justice Center and the most unlike its peers is The Ciri Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Clare Swan Early Learning Center ↗
- Who funds Alaska Native Heritage Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Alaska Native Justice Center ↗
- Who funds COOK INLET LENDING CENTER ↗
- Who funds ALASKA INJURY PREVENTION CENTER ↗
- Who funds The CIRI Foundation ↗
- Who funds Anchorage Community Land Trust ↗
- Who funds KOAHNIC BROADCAST CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds TYONEK TRIBAL CONSERVATION DISTRICT ↗
- Who funds RURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds ANCHORAGE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Get Out the Native Vote ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska ↗
- Who funds Anchorage Museum Foundation ↗
- Who funds Facing Foster Care in Alaska ↗
- Who funds ALASKA FEDERATION OF NATIVES ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA ↗
- Who funds Anchorage Museum Association ↗
- Who funds Beans Cafe Inc ↗
- Who funds ALASKA CHILDREN'S TRUST ↗
- Who funds FIRST ALASKANS INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ARCTIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Rasmuson Foundation · Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium · The Carr Foundation Inc · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Frances & David Rose Foundation · United Way of Anchorage · Alaska Children's Trust · Atwood Foundation Inc · Richard L and Diane M Block Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cook Inlet Tribal Council funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.