Skip to content
Cook Inlet Tribal Council at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Cook Inlet Tribal Council

Citc's (Cook Inlet Tribal Council) mission is to work in partnership with alaska native/american indian individuals to connect them to opportunities that fulfill their potential through education and youth services, employment and training resources, career development, family preservation, and support for individuals recovering from…

$13M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$761k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$18MCrime & Legal$6.8MHuman Services$5.6MHousing & Shelter$2.5MArts & Culture$1.3MHealth$1.3MCivil Rights$695kCommunity Improvement$545kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 18 grants below total $2,517,396, the rows itemized in this filing. The $12,734,432 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $10,217,036 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $199k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $708k
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.6M
$47,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$127M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COOK INLET HOUSING AUTHORITY$760,662
Anchorage School District$420,351
Alaska Native Justice Center$408,017
Ninilchik Traditional Council$249,065
Alaska Injury Prevention Cent$201,762
RURAL ALASKA CAP$92,487
Anchorage Community Land Trus$90,215
Launch Alaska$74,500
Cook Inlet Lending Center In$47,500
Knik Tribal Council$33,454
Chickaloon Village Traditiona$29,175
Seldovia Village Tribe$29,175
Anchorage Community Land Trus$21,209
BEANS CAFE INC$21,209
Native Village of Eklutna$17,115
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Alaska Childrens Trust: $15k → 22%Covenant House Alaska: $21k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39M · 22 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
13

Total granted

$39M
$512k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+7%

Still filing today

50%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $842k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Community ImprovementArts & CultureHealthEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    Clare Swan Early Learning Center
    6× · 2019–2024 · $15M · revenue +52% · 79% of their budget
  • AN
    Alaska Native Justice Center
    4× · 2019–2022 · $3.3M · revenue +192%
  • CI
    COOK INLET LENDING CENTER
    6× · 2017–2025 · $2.6M · revenue +409% · 28% of their budget

Funded once

  • TT
    TYONEK TRIBAL CONSERVATION DISTRICTgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $127k · revenue +537%
  • AC
    ANCHORAGE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $65k · revenue +100%
  • GO
    Get Out the Native Votegraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $52k · revenue +371% · 47% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alaska Rural Electric Cooperative Association Educational Foundation Inc
Environment
2
Alaska Childrens Alliance

The Alaska Childrens Alliance strengthens Alaskas multidisciplinary response to child abuse by supporting, educating, and connecting professionals who work to protect children, promote healing for children and families, and advance…

Crime & Legal
3
Alaska Historical Publication Association
Education
4
Inuit Circumpolar Council-Alaska

Icc alaska exists as the unified voice and collective spirit of alaskan inuit, to promote, protect and advance inuit culture and society.

Arts & Culture
5
The Aleut Foundation
Education
6
Alaska Nannut Co-Management Council

The alaska nannut co-management council (ancc) was established to represent the collective alaska native voice in polar bear co-management. ancc is a tribally authorized organization with membership consisting of the 15 tribes in alaska…

Animals
7
Arctic Encounter

The mission of the Arctic Encounter Symposium is to convene leaders and experts from every arena to tackle the shared interests and concerns of the United States and the global community as we look north to the last emerging frontierthe…

Environment
8
Alaska Trails

Building partnerships, building trails. Working to build trails across the state and build capacity for trail organizations.

Recreation & Sports
9
Ahtna Intertribal Resource Commission

The core purpose of AITRC is "traditional resource stewardship." The core values are "survival; protect and enhance subsistence resources; and partnerships." The vision statement is "our way of life and cultural tradition is unified and…

Environment
10
The Alaska Center

We engage, empower, and elect alaskans to stand up for our clean air and water, healthy communities, and a strong democracy.

Environment
11
Alaska Native Health Board

The mission of the alaska native health board is to promote the spiritual, physical, mental, social, and cultural well-being and pride of alaska native people.

—
12
Northern Alaska Environmental Center

Since 1971, the northern alaska environmental center has promoted environmental conservation and sustainable resource stewardship in interior and arctic alaska through education and advocacy.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alaska Native Justice Center; the most unlike its peers is The Ciri Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Clare Swan Early Learning Center: $15,362,115 · OtherClare Swan Early Learning CenterKnik Tribal Council: $2,982,915 · OtherKnik Tribal CouncilCHICKALOON VILLAGE TRADITIONAL COUNCIL: $1,716,349 · OtherCHICKALOON VILLAGE TRADITIONAL COUNCILNinilchik Traditional Council: $1,193,310 · Other+20 more: $4,293,272 · Other+20 moreAlaska Native Heritage Center Inc: $4,654,035 · Arts & CultureAlaska Native …KOAHNIC BROADCAST CORPORATION: $260,521 · Arts & Culture+2 more: $65,000 · Arts & CultureAlaska Native Justice Center: $3,312,914 · Civil RightsAlaska Na…COOK INLET LENDING CENTER: $2,576,391 · Community ImprovementRURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $174,582 · Community Improvement+2 more: $84,500 · Community ImprovementALASKA INJURY PREVENTION CENTER: $1,442,667 · HealthANCHORAGE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $64,673 · HealthThe CIRI Foundation: $1,207,401 · PhilanthropyAnchorage Community Land Trust: $511,424 · Education+1 more: $5,500 · Education
Other$25,547,961Arts & Culture$4,979,556Civil Rights$3,312,914Community Improvement$2,835,473Health$1,507,340Philanthropy$1,207,401Education$516,924

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetClare Swan Early Learning Center: $15,362,115 over 6y, 79% of budgetAlaska Native Heritage Center Inc: $4,654,035 over 4y, 24% of budgetAlaska Native Justice Center: $3,312,914 over 4y, 20% of budgetCOOK INLET LENDING CENTER: $2,576,391 over 6y, 28% of budgetALASKA INJURY PREVENTION CENTER: $1,442,667 over 8y, 13% of budgetThe CIRI Foundation: $1,207,401 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetAnchorage Community Land Trust: $511,424 over 3y, 26% of budgetKOAHNIC BROADCAST CORPORATION: $260,521 over 3y, 4.5% of budgetRURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM: $174,582 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTYONEK TRIBAL CONSERVATION DISTRICT: $127,193 over 1y, 15% of budgetLaunch Alaska: $74,500 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetANCHORAGE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $64,673 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGet Out the Native Vote: $51,801 over 1y, 47% of budgetBeans Cafe Inc: $41,209 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska: $40,259 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAnchorage Museum Foundation: $40,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFacing Foster Care in Alaska: $37,759 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetALASKA FEDERATION OF NATIVES: $35,168 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE ALASKA: $34,185 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAnchorage Museum Association: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALASKA CHILDREN'S TRUST: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFIRST ALASKANS INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetARCTIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Clare Swan Early Learning Center ↗
  • Who funds Alaska Native Heritage Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Alaska Native Justice Center ↗
  • Who funds COOK INLET LENDING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA INJURY PREVENTION CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The CIRI Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Anchorage Community Land Trust ↗
  • Who funds KOAHNIC BROADCAST CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds RURAL ALASKA COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds TYONEK TRIBAL CONSERVATION DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds Launch Alaska ↗
  • Who funds ANCHORAGE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Get Out the Native Vote ↗
  • Who funds Beans Cafe Inc ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Southcentral Alaska ↗
  • Who funds Anchorage Museum Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Facing Foster Care in Alaska ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA FEDERATION OF NATIVES ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ALASKA ↗
  • Who funds Anchorage Museum Association ↗
  • Who funds ALASKA CHILDREN'S TRUST ↗
  • Who funds FIRST ALASKANS INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Commonwealth North Inc ↗
  • Who funds ARCTIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Alaska Community …Rasmuson FoundationAlaska Native Tribal …The Carr Foundation I…Valley Hospital Assoc…First Nations Develop…M J Murdock Charitabl…Frances & David Rose …United Way of Anchora…Alaska Children's Tru…Atwood Foundation IncRichard L and Diane M…
The Alaska Community FoundationAK40.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Alaska Community Foundation · Rasmuson Foundation · Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium · The Carr Foundation Inc · Valley Hospital Association Inc Dba Mat-Su Health Foundation · First Nations Development Institute · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · Frances & David Rose Foundation · United Way of Anchorage · Alaska Children's Trust · Atwood Foundation Inc · Richard L and Diane M Block Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cook Inlet Tribal Council funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cook Inlet Tribal Council. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cook Inlet Tribal Council’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home