Skip to content
Conway Regional Medical Center Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Conway Regional Medical Center Inc

Conway regional medical center is accountable to the community to provide high-quality, compassionate health care services.

$867k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$199k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$1.5MRecreation & Sports$390kCommunity Improvement$375kHealth$202kArts & Culture$58kHuman Services$48kPhilanthropy$43kReligion$15k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $522,952, the rows itemized in this filing. The $867,158 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $344,206 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $38k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $443k
$8,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$260M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UCA FOUNDATION$199,112
CONWAY REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC$130,545
CONWAY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$112,845
CONWAY HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC DEPARTMENT$37,950
GREENBRIER SCHOOL DISTRICT$8,000
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS$8,000
GREENBRIER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE$6,500
CONWAY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$5,000
PINE STREET BACKPACK PROGRAM$5,000
TOAD SUCK DAZE$5,000
CONWAY KIWANIS CLUB$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–22, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CONWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $39k → 15%CONWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $25k → 15%CONWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $20k → 15%CONWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 11 repeat orgs$518k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue -6% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$2.1M
$176k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-6%
-9%

Still filing today

64%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $343k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesReligionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    CONWAY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    7× · 2018–2024 · $329k · revenue +34%
  • TS
    TOAD SUCK DAZE INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $58k · revenue +38%
  • KI
    KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL K01260 CONWAY
    3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS
    one grant, 2018 · $111k
  • VS
    VILONIA SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • DW
    DEEP WELL MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -40%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conway Foundation Inc

To empower current and aspiring entrepreneurs, innovators, and small buisness leaders

Philanthropy
2
Conway Cancer Foundation

The mission of conway cancer foundation is to provide education and support for cancer patients and their families.

Health
3
Arkansas Construction Education Foundation

Provide educational programs for construction industries.

Education
4
Central Arkansas Christian Schools Inc

To provide each student the highest quality academic, spiritual, social and physical education in an encouraging christian environment.

Education
5
Central Arkansas Development Council

To provide services to low income individuals.

Community Improvement
6
Acc Capital Foundation

The organization promotes educational activities which foster entrepreneurial development in arkansas with the goal of increasing business startup creation and leadership development.

Unclassified
7
Arkansas Education Association

Advocate for educational professionals and unite our members and the state to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.

Education
8
Foundation of the Arkansas Sports Hall of Fame

To honor the legacy of Arkansas sports history

Arts & Culture
9
Arkansans for Education Reform Foundation
Education
10
Ua-Pb Alumni Scholarship Endowment Fund University of Arkansas

The university of arkansas at pine bluff's alumni scholarship endowment fund's mission was created to provide scholarships to the university to assist with providing education and training which meet the needs of a culturally diverse…

—
11
Arkansas Community Colleges

Provide services to arkansas two year colleges.

Education
12
Northwest Arkansas Community College Foundation Inc

To encourage support for and aid in the continued development of Northwest Arkansas Community College and to solicit, accept, hold, invest, and administer any gifts, bequests, or property of any sort for this educational purpose.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Central Ar Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Conway Public Schools Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC: $1,351,056 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INCUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $199,112 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INCTOAD SUCK DAZE INC: $57,602 · Education+1 more: $5,000 · EducationCONWAY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $329,145 · OtherCONWAY AREA CHAMBER OF CO…UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $110,700 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARK…ALL SPORTS PRODUCTIONS INC: $40,500 · OtherALL SPORTS PRODUCTIONS IN…GREENBRIER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $31,000 · Other+7 more: $70,884 · Other+7 moreConway Regional Health Foundation Inc: $130,545 · HealthCounseling Associates Inc: $45,500 · HealthCONWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $169,400 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS INC: $36,000 · PhilanthropyKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL K01260 CONWAY: $20,300 · PhilanthropyDEEP WELL MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 · ReligionARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK FOUNDATION: $7,500 · Arts & CultureCONWAY DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP INC: $5,750 · Community Improvement
Education$1,612,770Other$582,229Health$176,045Human Services$169,400Philanthropy$56,300Religion$15,000Arts & Culture$7,500Community Improvement$5,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC: $1,351,056 over 5y, 4.5% of budgetCONWAY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $329,145 over 7y, 2.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC: $199,112 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $169,400 over 6y, 37% of budgetConway Regional Health Foundation Inc: $130,545 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetTOAD SUCK DAZE INC: $57,602 over 6y, 3.4% of budgetCounseling Associates Inc: $45,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS INC: $36,000 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL K01260 CONWAY: $20,300 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetDEEP WELL MINISTRIES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONWAY DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP INC: $5,750 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCONWAY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONWAY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CONWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Conway Regional Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TOAD SUCK DAZE INC ↗
  • Who funds Counseling Associates Inc ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL K01260 CONWAY ↗
  • Who funds DEEP WELL MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONWAY DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds CONWAY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arkansas Community Fo…Nabholz Charitable Fo…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Arkansas Community Foundation IncAR22.9× affinity9 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Nabholz Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Conway Regional Medical Center Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Conway Regional Medical Center Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Conway Regional Medical Center’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home