· Public charity
Conway Regional Medical Center Inc
Conway regional medical center is accountable to the community to provide high-quality, compassionate health care services.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 11 grants below total $522,952 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $867,158 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $344,206 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $38k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $443k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UCA FOUNDATION | $199,112 |
| CONWAY REGIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION INC | $130,545 |
| CONWAY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $112,845 |
| CONWAY HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC DEPARTMENT | $37,950 |
| GREENBRIER SCHOOL DISTRICT | $8,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS | $8,000 |
| GREENBRIER CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $6,500 |
| CONWAY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| TOAD SUCK DAZE | $5,000 |
| PINE STREET BACKPACK PROGRAM | $5,000 |
| CONWAY KIWANIS CLUB | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–22, $94k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of -6% since the first grant, against -9% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $343k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACONWAY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE7× · 2018–2024 · $329k · revenue +34%
- TSTOAD SUCK DAZE INC6× · 2018–2024 · $58k · revenue +33%
- KIKIWANIS INTERNATIONAL K01260 CONWAY3× · 2022–2024 · $20k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSASone grant, 2018 · $111k
- VSVILONIA SCHOOLSone grant, 2018 · $15k
- DWDEEP WELL MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue -40%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To empower current and aspiring entrepreneurs, innovators, and small buisness leaders
The mission of conway cancer foundation is to provide education and support for cancer patients and their families.
Provide educational programs for construction industries.
To provide each student the highest quality academic, spiritual, social and physical education in an encouraging christian environment.
To provide services to low income individuals.
The organization promotes educational activities which foster entrepreneurial development in arkansas with the goal of increasing business startup creation and leadership development.
Advocate for educational professionals and unite our members and the state to fulfill the promise of public education to prepare every student to succeed in a diverse and interdependent world.
To honor the legacy of Arkansas sports history
The university of arkansas at pine bluff's alumni scholarship endowment fund's mission was created to provide scholarships to the university to assist with providing education and training which meet the needs of a culturally diverse…
Provide services to arkansas two year colleges.
To encourage support for and aid in the continued development of Northwest Arkansas Community College and to solicit, accept, hold, invest, and administer any gifts, bequests, or property of any sort for this educational purpose.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Central Ar Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Conway Public Schools Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL AR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONWAY AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONWAY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Conway Regional Health Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds TOAD SUCK DAZE INC ↗
- Who funds Counseling Associates Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS INC ↗
- Who funds KIWANIS INTERNATIONAL K01260 CONWAY ↗
- Who funds DEEP WELL MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORK FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONWAY DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds CONWAY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Nabholz Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Conway Regional Medical Center Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.