· Private foundation
Continuing to Serve Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $150k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WARRIOR RISING | $75,000 |
| AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS (ACP) | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $40,000 |
| VETERANS COLLABORATIVE | $25,000 |
| USO | $25,000 |
| DOG TAG BAKERY | $25,000 |
| WOMEN VETERANS INTERACTIVE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| PRITZKER MILITARY MUSEUM & LIBRARY | $10,000 |
| WOMEN IN MILITARY SERVICE FOR AMERICAN MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| EASTER SEALS | $5,000 |
| PROJECT HEALING WATERS | $5,000 |
| THE FILM COLLABORATIVE (FIGHT TO FIGHT) | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WRWarrior Rising3× · 2023–2025 · $175k · revenue +22%
AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS2× · 2024–2025 · $100k · revenue 0%- WVWOMEN VETERANS INTERACTIVE FOUNDATION4× · 2022–2025 · $45k · revenue -41%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $25k
- FFubuone grant, 2024 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Services for veterans
Offer mentoring to army women minorities
Training and Supports for Veterans, First Responders and their Families, we specialize in entrepreneurial training but that is not the only kind of support we provide.
To empower entrepreneur women associated with the military;inclusive of veterans, active duty, reservists and military spouses, to scale successfully, by establishing strategic alliances, leveraging public/private-sector opportunities,…
NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.
Counseling for veteran issues relationships and career guidance
Transition for service members.
Warrior Wellness Program, Inc. provides alternative therapies, services and community engagement to combat veterans, active duty military and their spouses. Services are primarily delivered through the five-day Accelerated Wellness Program…
The VCC mission is to assist veterans, military, and their families in successfully integrating into their community by connecting them with local individuals and organizations that can assist them in building thriving lives.
Organized and operated exclusively for charitable purposes for combat veterans to provide motivation, camaraderie, and to offer a release to cope with similar difficulties in a positive and therapeutic way. Providing safe, fun, and…
CoderVets is a 501(c)(3) Nonprofit Workforce Development organization offering paid Registered Apprenticeship tech training for eligible military veterans, reservists and family, including family of active duty service-members and fallen…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Women in Military Service for America Memorial Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Easter Seals Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Warrior Rising ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CORPORATE PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds WOMEN VETERANS INTERACTIVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DOG TAG INC ↗
- Who funds Veterans Collaborative ↗
- Who funds WOMEN IN MILITARY SERVICE FOR AMERICA MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HEALING WATERS FLY FISHING INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Continuing to Serve Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Project Healing Waters Fly Fishing Inc — 46% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.