Skip to content

· Private foundation

Consolidated Chartrust Pre 1069

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$77k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Religion$123kHealth$108kPhilanthropy$63kYouth Development$35kRecreation & Sports$26kCommunity Improvement$24kHuman Services$21kEducation$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $67k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,533
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION$10,262
PHOEBE-DEVITT HOMES$6,903
MARCH OF DIMES INC$6,478
HOPE ENTERPRISES INC$6,478
GREATER SUSQ VALLEY UNITED WAY$6,416
SUNBURY KIWANIS CLUB$6,401
MT CARMEL BOROUGH PARK$4,849
GREENCASTLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,965
THE KLINESGROVE METHODIST CHURCH$2,919
AMERICAS KESWICK$2,540
COVENANT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH$2,540
DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$2,540
LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE$2,533
MOODY BIBLE INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO$2,533
THE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL$2,533
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BETHANY CHILDRENS HOME: $4k → 11%HOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $11k → 12%BETHANY CHILDRENS HOME: $2k → 11%HOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $6k → 12%BETHANY CHILDRENS HOME: $2k → 11%HOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $6k → 12%BETHANY CHILDRENS HOME: $2k → 11%HOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $6k → 12%BETHANY CHILDRENS HOME: $848 → 11%HOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $2k → 12%BETHANY CHILDRENS HOME: $780 → 11%HOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $2k → 12%BETHANY CHILDRENS HOME: $620 → 11%HOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $2k → 12%LUTHERCARE: $652 → 9%LUTHERCARE: $386 → 9%LUTHERCARE: $349 → 9%LUTHERCARE: $330 → 9%LUTHERCARE: $142 → 9%LUTHERCARE: $131 → 9%LUTHERCARE: $104 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
IL
PA
NJ
VA
MD
TN
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$373k · 26 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
3

Total granted

$373k
$5k

Still filing today

38%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $579 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HE
    HOPE ENTERPRISES INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +1%
  • SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +25%
  • DT
    Dallas Theological Seminary
    7× · 2019–2025 · $14k · revenue +52%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • UC
    UNITED CHRIST OF CHURCH
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • UM
    UNTD METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2019 · $150
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lutheran Home At Moorestown

Through the power of the holy spirit and in response to god's love as revealed in the gospel, the mission of lutheran social ministries of nj is to serve those who hurt, who are in need, or who have limited choices through an array of…

—
2
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
3
Cornwall Manor

Cornwall manor offers diversified and high quality housing, health care and related services for individuals to achieve a retirement and aging lifestyle they find fulfilling in a secure, caring and christian environment.

Human Services
4
Bethel University

We educate and equip students to lead lives of impact through transformative academics in a christ-centered community.

Education
5
Christian Care Surprise Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
6
Christian Care Mesa Ii Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Housing & Shelter
7
Christian Care Mesa Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.

Human Services
8
Methodist Retirement Communities

The organization's exempt purpose is to be the corporate and administrative headquarters for methodist retirement communities and its affiliated ministries.

Housing & Shelter
9
The Baptist Home of Philadelphia

The mission of the baptist home of philadelphia is dedicated to providing quality continuing care living facilities and support services in a christian environment respecting the dignity and sanctity of all individuals regardless of their…

Human Services
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lancaster Bible College; the most unlike its peers is The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SUNBURY KIWANIS CLUB: $35,498 · OtherSUNBURY KIWANIS CLUBMT CARMEL BOROUGH PARK: $26,307 · OtherMT CARMEL BOROUGH PARKCENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA COMMUNITY: $23,579 · OtherCENTRAL SUSQUEHANNA COMMUNITYGREENCASTLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $16,087 · OtherGREENCASTLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHTHE KLINESGROVE METHODIST CHURCH: $15,835 · OtherTHE KLINESGROVE METHODIST CHURCHCOVENANT UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $13,783 · OtherCOVENANT UNITED METHODIST CHURCHGIDEONS INTERNATIONAL: $13,741 · OtherGIDEONS INTERNATIONALALASKA MORAVIAN CHURCH: $10,558 · OtherALASKA MORAVIAN CHURCH+12 more: $21,421 · Other+12 morePHOEBE-DEVITT HOMES: $37,451 · HealthPHOEBE-DEVITT HOMESMARCH OF DIMES INC: $35,145 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INCMORAVIAN MANORS INC: $3,017 · HealthSUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY: $34,811 · PhilanthropySUSQUEHANNA VALLE…COMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION: $28,312 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY GIVING …HOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $35,145 · Human ServicesHOPE ENTERPRI…BETHANY CHILDRENS HOME: $12,483 · Human ServicesBETHANY CHILD…LUTHERCARE: $2,094 · Human ServicesThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $13,963 · EducationThe Moody B…Dallas Theological Seminary: $13,783 · EducationDallas Theo…LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE: $13,741 · EducationLANCASTER B…AMERICA'S KESWICK: $13,783 · Religion
Other$176,809Health$75,613Philanthropy$63,123Human Services$49,722Education$41,487Religion$13,783

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHOEBE-DEVITT HOMES: $37,451 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $35,145 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE ENTERPRISES INC: $35,145 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY: $34,811 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION: $28,312 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetThe Moody Bible Institute of Chicago: $13,963 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary: $13,783 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA'S KESWICK: $13,783 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE: $13,741 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY CHILDRENS HOME: $12,483 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMORAVIAN MANORS INC: $3,017 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERCARE: $2,094 over 7y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHOEBE-DEVITT HOMES ↗
  • Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Moody Bible Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds Dallas Theological Seminary ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA'S KESWICK ↗
  • Who funds LANCASTER BIBLE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY CHILDRENS HOME ↗
  • Who funds MORAVIAN MANORS INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERCARE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Consolidated Chartrust Pre 1069 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Consolidated Chartrust Pre 1069. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Consolidated Chartrust Pre 1069’s filings →

    More from the funding graph