Skip to content
Consejo de Federaciones Mexicanas En Norte America at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Consejo de Federaciones Mexicanas En Norte America

Create opportunities for latino immigrants in north america, with a special focus on california.

$96k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Arts & Culture$284kCrime & Legal$50kCivil Rights$45kEducation$30kEmployment$18kHealth$8kRecreation & Sports$6kHuman Services$6k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $7,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $95,930 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $88,430 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VISION Y COMPROMISO$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FEDERACION DURANGUENSE USA INC: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$323k · 3 repeat orgs$122k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$323k
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+63%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Civil RightsEducationArts & CultureEmploymentYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LM
    LATINO MEDIA COLLABORATIVE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $284k · revenue +45% · 58% of their budget
  • LC
    LEADERSHIP COUNSEL FOR JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $21k · revenue -13%
  • Organizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc
    2× · 2021–2022 · $18k · revenue +125%

Funded once

  • CR
    CONFLUENCE RISING
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +14%
  • RC
    RAICES CULTURAgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +86% · 26% of their budget
  • FM
    FUERZA MIGRANTE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $24k · revenue +233% · 83% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Latino Mayors and Elected City Officials Coalition of Fresno

The Latinos Mayors and elected city officials coalition came together for the purpose to develop forums for dialogue and action in order to mitigate the challenges experienced by under-represented persons in Fresno communities; to educate…

Education
2
Central Valley Journalism Collaborative

We grow local news for and from the Valley to help you live a healthy and informed life. We connect Central Valley communities with the support needed to grow and sustain local journalism.

Philanthropy
3
Latinas Usa
Community Improvement
4
Fuerza Y Union Multiple

Our mission is to build stronger, healthier communities, rich in values and culture. We offer a safe space to access services with mutual and equal respect, working with and for the Latinx community.

Community Improvement
5
Inland Empire Immigrant Youth Collective

The Inland Empire Immigrant Youth Collective creates a safe space for immigrant youth to express themselves and achieve their full potential and their identity that intersects with being undocumented. Through grassroots organizing, our…

Human Services
6
Alliance for a Better Community

Advancing social, economic, racial equity and justice for the latino / a community and the los angeles region through power building and policy advocacy.

Community Improvement
7
Latino Political Network
—
8
California Latinas for Reproductive Justice

California latinas for reproductive justice (clrj) is a statewide organization committed to honoring the experiences of latinas to uphold our dignity, our bodies, sexuality, and families. we build latinas' power and cultivate leadership…

Health
9
Los Amigos De La Comunidad Inc

To increase the capacity of the underserved communities of the Imperial Valley and intertwined regions facing socio-economic and environmental injustices, health care access disparities and institutional discrimination. Los Amigos de la…

Public Benefit
10
California Chicano News Media Assoc Asu Walter Cronkite School of Journalism

Advancing Latinos into Journalism

—
11
Chile-California Council

The Chile-California Council is a San Francisco-based nonprofit dedicated to developing and promoting joint endeavors and cooperative relations between Chile and California, as well as individuals, legal entities and other institutions in…

International
12
Civica Latino

Increase community engagement and voter participation of latino voters in the state of california, regardless of political affiliation. nonpartisan, bicultural and bilingual, civica latino is dedicated to increasing latino voter turnout…

Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Confluence Rising; the most unlike its peers is Anahuak Youth Sports Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LATINO MEDIA COLLABORATIVE: $284,165 · Arts & CultureLATINO MEDIA COLLABORATIVECONFLUENCE RISING: $49,939 · Civil RightsCONFLUENCE RISINGFUERZA MIGRANTE FOUNDATION INC: $24,029 · Civil RightsFUERZA MIGRANTE FOUNDATI…LEADERSHIP COUNSEL FOR JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY: $20,500 · Civil RightsLEADERSHIP COUNSEL FOR J…RAICES CULTURA: $25,000 · EducationRAICES CU…VISION Y COMPROMISO: $7,500 · EducationVISION Y …ONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY: $5,000 · EducationONEFUTURE…Organizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc: $18,470 · EmploymentANAHUAK YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $5,500 · Youth DevelopmentFederacion Duranguense USA Inc: $5,500 · Human Services
Arts & Culture$284,165Civil Rights$94,468Education$37,500Employment$18,470Youth Development$5,500Human Services$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLATINO MEDIA COLLABORATIVE: $284,165 over 2y, 58% of budgetCONFLUENCE RISING: $49,939 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetRAICES CULTURA: $25,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetFUERZA MIGRANTE FOUNDATION INC: $24,029 over 1y, 83% of budgetLEADERSHIP COUNSEL FOR JUSTICE AND ACCOUNTABILITY: $20,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOrganizacion en California de Lideres Campesinas Inc: $18,470 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVISION Y COMPROMISO: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANAHUAK YOUTH SPORTS ASSOCIATION: $5,500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetFederacion Duranguense USA Inc: $5,500 over 1y, 17% of budgetONEFUTURE COACHELLA VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The California Endowm…The California Wellne…California Community …Inland Empire Communi…The James Irvine Foun…California Healthcare…Public Health Institu…Weingart FoundationAmazonsmile Foundation
The California EndowmentCA19.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The California Endowment · The California Wellness Foundation · California Community Foundation · Inland Empire Community Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation · Public Health Institute · Weingart Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Consejo de Federaciones Mexicanas En Norte America funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Consejo de Federaciones Mexicanas En Norte America. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Consejo de Federaciones Mexicanas En Norte America?

    Find your warmest path to Consejo de Federaciones Mexicanas En Norte America through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $10k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Consejo de Federaciones Mexicanas En Norte America’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home