Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Conscious Kids Inc - Agy Main

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$265k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$935kYouth Development$180kArts & Culture$125kHealth$125kInternational$105kEducation$95kHousing & Shelter$95kCommunity Improvement$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k16 grants · $260k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION$40,000
BONNIE BRAE$35,000
NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN$35,000
TRINITAS HEALTH FOUNDATION$20,000
Greater Life$20,000
SIERRA HOUSE$10,000
WYNONAS HOUSE A NEW JERSEY NONPROFIT$10,000
CENTER FOR EVALUATION AND COUNSELING INC$10,000
A CHANCE IN LIFE INC$10,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA INC$10,000
FRESH AIR FUND$10,000
GRAND STSREET SETTLEMENT INC$10,000
GRAHAM WINDHAM$10,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF CENTRAL$10,000
NEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $360k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CHILDREN ON THE GREEN INC: $10k → 4%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $10k → 20%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $10k → 20%CHILDREN ON THE GREEN INC: $10k → 4%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $10k → 20%ROOTS & WINGS: $10k → 4%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $10k → 20%ROOTS & WINGS: $10k → 4%GRAHAM WINDHAM: $10k → 20%MOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION: $40k → 10%MOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%MOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%SIERRA HOUSE: $10k → 16%MOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%MOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%A CHANCE IN LIFE INC: $10k → 17%A CHANCE IN LIFE INC: $10k → 17%GRAND STSREET SETTLEMENT INC: $30k → 17%GRAND STSREET SETTLEMENT INC: $15k → 17%GRAND STSREET SETTLEMENT INC: $10k → 17%GRAND STSREET SETTLEMENT INC: $10k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $25k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $20k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $20k → 17%CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 19 repeat orgs$180k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
7

Total granted

$1.6M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+4%

Still filing today

95%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthRecreation & SportsEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BONNIE BRAE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $445k · revenue +75%
  • NEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $225k · revenue +48%
  • GL
    GREATER LIFE INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +76%

Funded once

  • PF
    PREP FOR PREP
    one grant, 2017 · $30k · revenue -28%
  • TH
    THE HARMONY PROGRAM INC
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -3%
  • MM
    MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Aid College Prep Charter School

Prepare elementary & middle school students for success in high school, college & life.

Education
2
Forestdale Inc

Forestdale's mission is to ensure that children have the assets they need to thrive.

Human Services
3
Bigs & Littles Nyc Mentoring Inc

Bigs & littles nyc mentoring is a nonprofit community-based organization which transforms the lives of vulnerable nyc children and strengthens families through professionally guided one-to-one mentoring, life skills programming, and…

—
4
Northside Center for Child Development Inc

To foster the healthy development of children and families and seek to empower them to respond constructively to negative societal factors including racism and its related consequences. through comprehensive, high quality mental health and…

Education
5
The Child Center of Ny Inc

The child center of ny strengthens children and families with skills, opportunities, and emotional support to build healthy, successful lives.

—
6
St Vincent's Services Inc

For over 150 years, st. vincent's services, inc. (d/b/a heartshare st. vincent's services) has been a symbol of hope, compassion, and strength for vulnerable and under-resourced communities in new york city. (see on schedule o)

Human Services
7
Harlem Children's Zone Inc

We enhance the life for children and families in some of nyc's most devastated neighborhoods.

Human Services
8
The Friends of Crown Heights Educational Centers Inc

To provide a safe, affordable and comprehensive program of high-quality early childhood education, parental and family support, as well as academic enrichment and recreational programs.

Human Services
9
Preferred Behavioral Health of Nj Inc

To deliver quality and compassionate behavioral health services to individuals and families all the time through a trauma informed care philosophy and approach.

Health
10
Nysarc Inc New York City Chapter

We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.

Human Services
11
Bronxworks Inc

Bronxworks helps individuals and families improve their economic and social well being. from toddlers to seniors, we feed, shelter, teach, and support our neighbors to build a stronger community. bronxworks has operations at over 50 sites,…

Human Services
12
Cardinal Mccloskey School and Home for Children

The organization strives to protect, empower and promote independence for at-risk children and families and those with developmental disabilities through quality community based services.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Roots & Wings Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Monmouth Medical Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 43 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr20%35%20–35yr14%19%35–55yr12%35%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr20%29%20–35yr14%33%35–55yr12%27%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
12%
3,660/31,640

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/28
Grantees still filing
19/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BONNIE BRAE — $445,000 · Human ServicesBONNIE BRAEMOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 · Human ServicesMOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION INCTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY — $85,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETYGRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC — $65,000 · Human ServicesGRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INCGRAHAM WINDHAM — $50,000 · Human ServicesGRAHAM WINDHAM+4 more — $70,000 · Human Services+4 moreNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC — $225,000 · OtherNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILD…BLOOMFIELD COLLEGE OF MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY INC — $55,000 · OtherBLOOMFIELD COLLEGE OF MONT…BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $20,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COASTAL AND — $20,000 · Other+9 more — $85,000 · Other+9 moreGREATER LIFE INC — $140,000 · Recreation & SportsGREATER LI…FRESH AIR FUND — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsFRESH AIR …TRINITAS FOUNDATION — $90,000 · HealthMONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER — $20,000 · HealthCENTER FOR EVALUATION & COUNSELING INC — $10,000 · HealthTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM — $60,000 · Arts & CultureROSIE'S THEATER KIDS INC — $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HARMONY PROGRAM INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureHOMEFRONT INC — $75,000 · EducationPREP FOR PREP — $30,000 · EducationTHE ALPHA WORKSHOPS INC — $35,000 · Employment
Human Services$805,000Other$405,000Recreation & Sports$160,000Health$120,000Arts & Culture$115,000Education$105,000Employment$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBONNIE BRAE — $445,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC — $225,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetGREATER LIFE INC — $140,000 over 6y, 8.2% of budgetTRINITAS FOUNDATION — $90,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMOMS HELPING MOMS FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 over 5y, 3.2% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY — $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEFRONT INC — $75,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGRAND STREET SETTLEMENT INC — $65,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM — $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOMFIELD COLLEGE OF MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY INC — $55,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGRAHAM WINDHAM — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALPHA WORKSHOPS INC — $35,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetROSIE'S THEATER KIDS INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetPREP FOR PREP — $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HARMONY PROGRAM INC — $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCHILDREN ON THE GREEN INC — $20,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW YORK CITY INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA CHANCE IN LIFEINC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetROOTS & WINGS FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetMONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR EVALUATION & COUNSELING INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetWYNONA'S HOUSE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTUDIO IN A SCHOOL ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORKERS FOR CHILDREN INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CRENULATED COMPANY LTD — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSierra House Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE AGENCY OF CENTRAL NJ — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson F…Investors Foundation …Community Foundation …Pseg Foundation IncEj Grassmann TrustThe Provident Bank Fo…Columbia Bank Foundat…Ann Earle Talcott FundE and S Van Houten Me…Gertrude L Hirsch Cha…George a Ohl Jr TrustBristol-Myers Squibb …
The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ35.5× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Investors Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Pseg Foundation Inc · Ej Grassmann Trust · The Provident Bank Foundation · Columbia Bank Foundation · Ann Earle Talcott Fund · E and S Van Houten Memorial Fund · Gertrude L Hirsch Charitable Trust · George a Ohl Jr Trust · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Conscious Kids Inc - Agy Main funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Homefront Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Bonnie Brae — 3% of income from government
  • Children On the Green Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Jewish Family Service Agency of Central Nj — 1% of income from government
  • Sierra House Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Conscious Kids Inc - Agy Main?

Find your warmest path to Conscious Kids Inc - Agy Main through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home