How much did Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc grant in FY2024?

Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc reported 13 grants totaling $217,402 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc based?

Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc is based in CT.

Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc

Foundation Dossiers Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

· Public charity

Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc

Connecticut Land Conservation Council, Inc.

$217k

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$24k

Largest

01What you fund

0181% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2023–2024.

Environment$192kArts & Culture$20kOther$50k

02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k6 grants · $45k
$10k–50k7 grants · $118k

$12,000

Median grant

States reached

$4.4M

Total assets

Largest grants

East Haddam Land Trust Inc$23,777
Salisbury Association Inc$20,000
Litchfield Land Trust Inc$18,904
Groton Open Space Association Inc$18,000
Greenwich Land Trust$13,055
Clinton Land Conservation Trust$12,400
The Nature Conservancy of CT$12,000
Great Meadows Conservation Trust$9,247
Roxbury Land Trust$9,000
Old Lyme Land Trust$7,500
Wyndham Land Trust Inc$7,219
Kent Land Trust$6,000
Killingworth Land Conservation Trust Inc$6,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

None of your grants could be placed against cost of living need for this view.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Northern Connecticut Land Trust Inc

To preserve the natural resources of the northern CT region including agricultural land and other ecologically important open space.

Environment

Canton Land Conservation Trust Inc

to acquire, preserve, and protect land of scenic, natural or historic value within the Town of Canton and surrounding environs.

Environment

Farmington Land Trust

The Farmington Land Trust Inc protects open space in the town of Farmington CT through the acquisition of open space, stewardship of acquired land, education of the public about the importance of open space.

Environment

Stamford Land Conservation Trust Inc

To obtain lands through donation or purchase and to protect and preserve them. While preserving we are improving the sustainablity of wildlife, water tables and overall quality of our habitat.

Environment

Litchfield Land Trust Inc

Help ensure protection of open space land by acquiring conservation easements and properties to be held in their natural state in perpetuity and by informing and educating the public of the advantages of preserving Litchfield CT's rural…

Environment

Redding Land Trust Inc

The primary mission of Redding Land Trust is to preserve the natural resources of the Town of Redding, CT and to promote the scientific and educational study of local and natural resources, and to acquire, by gift or purchase, land or…

Environment

Essex Land Trust Inc

Land conservation and management

Environment

Watertown Land Trust

Preservation of open space in watertown, ct; maintenance of owned and conserved properties and public education of enviromental issues.

—

Sebasticook Regional Land Trust

The mission of the SRLT is to recognize and conserve the rich wild and working landscape of Central Maine's Sebasticook River watershed through conservation, stewardship and education. Our focal programs are land conservation for community…

Environment

The Barrington Land Conservation Trust

The purpose of the barrington land conservation trust is to protect and steward our local natural, scenic historic open spaces. blct will advocate on behalf of protection for these lands and work to educate the public about these resources.

—

Brewster Conservation Trust

Land conservation

Environment

The Scenic Hudson Land Trust Inc

See Schedule O for The Scenic Hudson Land Trust's mission statement.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Middlesex Land Trust and the most unlike its peers is East Haddam Land Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 52 years old; the field is 23. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 15% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/21

the rest of the field

159/2,642

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

20/20

Grantees still filing

12/20

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Environment$192,215Other$49,647Arts & Culture$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The John T and Jane a WiederholdCT16× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The John T and Jane a Wiederhold · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

11get no government money at all

2rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

04Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Norfolk Land Trust Inc.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~35 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 061072464 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on Norfolk Land Trust Inc, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 35 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 18% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc?

Find your warmest path to Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc?

More from the funding graph

Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

20 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Connecticut Land Conservation Council Inc?

More from the funding graph