Skip to content

· Public charity

Congregation of the Sisters of St Joseph Ministries Inc

To exercise the civil and canonical responsibilities for various sponsored ministries of the congregation.

$999k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$230k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$9.7MEducation$3.6MHealth$1.8MHousing & Shelter$785kCivil Rights$726kReligion$463kCrime & Legal$50k
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $49k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $915k
$87,318
Median grant
8
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC MOBILIZING NETWORK$230,364
TALLER DE JOSE$124,950
HEALING ACTION NETWORK$122,000
STJOSEPH ACADEMY$110,843
SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH DEAR NEIGHBORS MINISTRIES$88,950
STEPSTONE INC$87,450
THE WELL SPIRITUALITY CENTER INC$87,318
ABLE FAMILIES$62,800
NAZARETH ACADAMY INC$18,000
CHRIST IN THE WILDERNESS INC$15,981
CAREGIVER COMPANION INC$15,000
PEOPLE PROGRAM INC$7,500
ST JOSEPHS'S ACADEMY INC (BATON ROUGE)$6,686
ST JOSEPH'S RETREAT CENTER$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $175k → 19%TALLER DE JOSE: $136k → 14%PEOPLE PROGRAM: $125k → 23%CAREGIVER COMPANION INC: $61k → 19%TALLER DE JOSE: $115k → 14%PEOPLE PROGRAM INC: $39k → 23%CAREGIVER COMPANION INC: $41k → 19%TALLER DE JOSE: $110k → 14%PEOPLE PROGRAM: $27k → 23%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $35k → 19%TALLER DE JOSE: $86k → 14%PEOPLE PROGRAM: $26k → 23%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $35k → 19%TALLER DE JOSE: $77k → 14%PEOPLE PROGRAM: $26k → 23%CAREGIVER COMPANION: $35k → 19%TALLER DE JOSE: $71k → 14%PEOPLE PROGRAM INC: $13k → 23%CAREGIVER COMPANION INC: $15k → 19%TALLER DE JOSE: $66k → 14%PEOPLE PROGRAM INC: $10k → 23%TALLER DE JOSE: $65k → 14%PEOPLE PROGRAM INC: $8k → 23%MINISTRIES AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY: $50k → 23%SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH - MINISTRIES AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY: $34k → 23%SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH - MINISTRIES AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY: $25k → 23%HILLTOP ASPIRES INC: $46k → 16%HILLTOP ASPIRES INC: $35k → 16%TALLER DE JOSE: $125k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
IN
OH
MO
WV
KS
DC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$17M · 20 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
0

Total granted

$17M
$0

Still filing today

70%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCivil RightsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HEALING ACTION NETWORK INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.8M · revenue +129% · 48% of their budget
  • TD
    TALLER DE JOSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $850k · revenue +87% · 28% of their budget
  • SI
    STEPSTONE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $785k · revenue +40%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Spirituality Network

    The Spirituality Network connects people with resources for spiritual growth and depth, regardless of faith tradition though education and training, spiritual direction.

    Religion
    2
    His Helping Hands Ministries

    Provide safe housing and training to women who were victims of addiction,sex trafficking, abuse, homelesness or previously incarcerated.

    Religion
    3
    Cathedral Towers Inc

    Provide housing for low income elderly persons age 62 and over without regard to race, color, creed, national origin, religion, sex, familial status or disability.

    —
    4
    Carmelite Sisters of the Divine Heart of Jesus of Kentucky

    The carmelite sisters of the divine heart of jesus of kentucky strive to maintain our home as a true home away from home for our residents. our residents are senior citizens and disabled residents.

    —
    5
    Catholic Social Services of Montana

    Based on our commitment to catholic social teaching, catholic social services of montana provides for works of advocacy, compassion, pastoral outreach, education and social justice.

    —
    6
    St Joseph's Nursing Home Sisters Servants of Mary Immaculate

    44-bed licensed skilled nursing home in catonsville, maryland that provides nursing care services to its residents.

    —
    7
    His Harvest Stand

    To lift people out of poverty by responding to human need with the love of christ.

    Food & Nutrition
    8
    Called to Peace Ministries Inc

    Called To Peace Ministries exists to provide a compassionate, comprehensive, and Christ-centered response to those impacted by domestic abuse.

    Religion
    9
    Walking With Purpose Inc

    The primary purpose and mission of Walking with Purpose is religious in nature, specifically enabling women to know Christ through scripture. Walking with Purpose Inc. aims to bring women into a deeper personal relationship with Christ by…

    —
    10
    Chapel Pointe At Carlisle

    Chapel pointe at carlisle is a continuing care retirement community of the christian and missionary alliance and is for persons of all faiths. our mission is to provide comfortable retirement living and quality care and service to each…

    Human Services
    11
    The Wellspring Group

    Wellspring provides a discipleship model for individuals and churches to engage as a part of their overall spiritual development. this is done through retreat and small group experiences and through equipping churches and organizations to…

    Religion
    12
    St Joseph's Nursing Home Inc

    44 bed licensed skilled nursing home in catonsville, maryland that provides nursing care services to its residents.

    —
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stepstone Inc; the most unlike its peers is Caregiver Companion Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    7
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    8
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    14/15
    Grantees still filing
    10/15
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    CONGREGATION OF THE SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH INC: $5,594,878 · OtherCONGREGATION OF THE SISTERS OF ST JOSEPH INCST JOSEPH ACADEMY: $1,884,322 · OtherST JOSEPH ACADEMYTUTORING ENGLISH TO ADVANCE CHANGE: $1,428,427 · OtherTUTORING ENGLISH TO ADVANCE CHANGEWELL SPIRITUALITY CENTER: $693,301 · OtherWELL SPIRITUALITY CENTERDEAR NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES INC: $635,950 · OtherDEAR NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES INCABLE FAMILIES INC: $446,079 · OtherRIVER'S EDGE-A PLACE FOR REFLECTION AND ACTION: $401,111 · Other+4 more: $777,759 · Other+4 moreHEALING ACTION NETWORK INC: $1,809,800 · HealthHEALING ACT…TALLER DE JOSE: $850,406 · Human ServicesTALLER DE J…CAREGIVER COMPANION INC: $397,011 · Human ServicesCAREGIVER C…PEOPLE PROGRAM INC: $274,225 · Human ServicesPEOPLE PROG…MINISTRY AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY: $109,805 · Human ServicesMINISTRY AG…HILLTOP ASPIRES INC: $80,395 · Human ServicesSTEPSTONE INC: $785,017 · Housing & ShelterCATHOLIC MOBILIZING NETWORK: $726,496 · Civil RightsCHRIST IN THE WILDERNESS: $215,981 · Religion
    Other$11,861,827Health$1,809,800Human Services$1,711,842Housing & Shelter$785,017Civil Rights$726,496Religion$215,981

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHEALING ACTION NETWORK INC: $1,809,800 over 8y, 48% of budgetTUTORING ENGLISH TO ADVANCE CHANGE: $1,428,427 over 8y, 63% of budgetTALLER DE JOSE: $850,406 over 9y, 28% of budgetSTEPSTONE INC: $785,017 over 9y, 22% of budgetCATHOLIC MOBILIZING NETWORK: $726,496 over 9y, 23% of budgetWELL SPIRITUALITY CENTER: $693,301 over 9y, 43% of budgetDEAR NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES INC: $635,950 over 9y, 24% of budgetABLE FAMILIES INC: $446,079 over 9y, 19% of budgetRIVER'S EDGE-A PLACE FOR REFLECTION AND ACTION: $401,111 over 6y, 41% of budgetCAREGIVER COMPANION INC: $397,011 over 7y, 32% of budgetPEOPLE PROGRAM INC: $274,225 over 8y, 46% of budgetHOLY FAMILY CHILD CARE & DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $257,085 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetCHRIST IN THE WILDERNESS: $215,981 over 5y, 6.8% of budgetMINISTRY AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY: $109,805 over 3y, 14% of budgetHILLTOP ASPIRES INC: $80,395 over 2y, 6.3% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds HEALING ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
    • Who funds TUTORING ENGLISH TO ADVANCE CHANGE ↗
    • Who funds TALLER DE JOSE ↗
    • Who funds STEPSTONE INC ↗
    • Who funds CATHOLIC MOBILIZING NETWORK ↗
    • Who funds WELL SPIRITUALITY CENTER ↗
    • Who funds DEAR NEIGHBOR MINISTRIES INC ↗
    • Who funds ABLE FAMILIES INC ↗
    • Who funds RIVER'S EDGE-A PLACE FOR REFLECTION AND ACTION ↗
    • Who funds CAREGIVER COMPANION INC ↗
    • Who funds PEOPLE PROGRAM INC ↗
    • Who funds HOLY FAMILY CHILD CARE & DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
    • Who funds CHRIST IN THE WILDERNESS ↗
    • Who funds MINISTRY AGAINST THE DEATH PENALTY ↗
    • Who funds HILLTOP ASPIRES INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    American Endowment FoundationOH6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Congregation of the Sisters of St Joseph Ministries Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Congregation of the Sisters of St Joseph Ministries Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2025
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
      typical government reliance, FY20–25
      How this is measured
      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

      How this is measured
      Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

      Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      Play a game based on Congregation of the Sisters of St Joseph Ministries’ filings →

      More from the funding graph