Skip to content

· Public charity

Confluence Advocacy Inc

The organization's mission is to create a vibrant, competitive public education system, protect the environment and water resources and promote healthy communities for generations to come.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Public Benefit$5.6MInternational$850kEducation$600kCivil Rights$145kCommunity Improvement$125kHuman Services$100k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $325k
  • $250k+2 grants · $850k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STATE GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$500,000
REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION$350,000
COMMITTEE ON STATES$125,000
CENTER FOR INNOVATIVE POLICY$100,000
STATE DEMOCRACY ACTION FUND$100,000
THE NEWDEAL$25,000
THE NEWDEAL$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEW POLITICS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY INC: $100k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.0M · 12 repeat orgs$700k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$8.0M
$700k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+138%
+259%

Still filing today

92%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitCivil RightsEducationInternationalCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SG
    STATE GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.1M · revenue +137%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR INNOVATIVE POLICY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +181%
  • WH
    WITH HONOR ACTION INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $1.3M · revenue +295% · 29% of their budget

Funded once

  • YE
    Yes Every Kid Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $500k · revenue ×13,222
  • NP
    NEW POLITICS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +259%
  • LP
    LA PROMISE FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue +114%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Commission On Presidential Debates

Organize general election presidential and vice-presidential debates

Civil Rights
2
State Government Affairs Council

To advance and support the state government affairs profession by fostering community among peers and elected officials, building knowledge, and promoting diverse perspectives in a nonpartisan environment.

Community Improvement
3
The Campaign Legal Center Inc

The nonpartisan campaign legal center advances democracy through law at the federal, state and local levels, fighting for every american's rights to responsive government and a fair opportunity to participate in and affect the democratic…

Crime & Legal
4
State Leadership Project

State leadership project (slp) is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that strengthens civic infrastructure by supporting the charitable efforts of state-based donor alliances and funder communities. slp helps build, resource, and sustain…

Public Benefit
5
Center for Popular Democracy Inc

The center for popular democracy (cpd) and its affiliates know that everyday people have the power to change the world. we upend business and politics as usual to forge a representative, multiracial government and society where we all…

Public Benefit
6
Bipartisan Policy Center Inc

To drive principled solutions through rigorous analysis, reasoned negotiation, and respectful dialogue. to actively promote bipartisanship and work to address the key challenges facing the nation including energy and infrastructure,…

Public Benefit
7
R Street Institute

The r street institute is a nonprofit, nonpartisan, public-policy research organization ("think tank"). our mission is to engage in policy research and outreach to promote free markets and limited, effective government. (continued on…

Education
8
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
9
States Newsroom

States newsroom is the nation's largest state-focused nonprofit news organization, with reporting from every capital. every newsroom is led by a veteran local journalist with deep knowledge of the state's political history and media…

Arts & Culture
10
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Progress Texas Institute

The Progress Texas Institute provides research and strategic communications on issues with the ultimate goal of increasing civic engagement.

Civil Rights
12
State Democracy Project

The state democracy project dedicates itself to serving the general public and policy makers regarding the need to iteratively improve american democracy by encouraging increased citizen participation in elections and policy-making, as…

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is State Government Leadership Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Republican Main Street Partnership. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
14/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

STATE GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $2,100,000 · Public BenefitSTATE GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATIONREPUBLICAN GOVERNORS PUBLIC POLICY COMMITTEE INC: $725,000 · Public BenefitREPUBLICAN GOVERNORS PUBLIC POLICY COMMIT…STATE DEMOCRACY ACTION FUND: $200,000 · Public BenefitSTATE DEMOCRACY ACTION FUNDREPUBLICAN MAIN STREET PARTNERSHIP: $125,000 · Public BenefitNEW DEMOCRACY: $600,000 · OtherNEW DEMOCRACYTHE WELCOME PARTY INC: $500,000 · OtherTHE WELCOME PARTY INCLEADERSHIP NOW PROJECT: $450,000 · OtherLEADERSHIP NOW PROJEC…PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC: $95,000 · OtherPROGRESSIVE STATE LEA…WITH HONOR ACTION INC: $1,250,000 · Civil RightsWITH HONOR ACTION I…COMMITTEE ON STATES: $270,000 · Civil RightsCOMMITTEE ON STATESCENTER FOR INNOVATIVE POLICY: $1,300,000 · InternationalCENTER FOR INNOV…Yes Every Kid Foundation: $500,000 · EducationLA PROMISE FUND: $100,000 · EducationNEWDEAL: $375,000 · Community ImprovementNEW POLITICS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY INC: $100,000 · Human Services
Public Benefit$3,150,000Other$1,645,000Civil Rights$1,520,000International$1,300,000Education$600,000Community Improvement$375,000Human Services$100,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTATE GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION: $2,100,000 over 9y, 12% of budgetCENTER FOR INNOVATIVE POLICY: $1,300,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetWITH HONOR ACTION INC: $1,250,000 over 5y, 29% of budgetREPUBLICAN GOVERNORS PUBLIC POLICY COMMITTEE INC: $725,000 over 7y, 6.2% of budgetTHE WELCOME PARTY INC: $500,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetLEADERSHIP NOW PROJECT: $450,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetNEWDEAL: $375,000 over 9y, 8.3% of budgetCOMMITTEE ON STATES: $270,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetSTATE DEMOCRACY ACTION FUND: $200,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetREPUBLICAN MAIN STREET PARTNERSHIP: $125,000 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetNEW POLITICS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY INC: $100,000 over 1y, 7.4% of budgetLA PROMISE FUND: $100,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetPROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC: $95,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds STATE GOVERNMENT LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INNOVATIVE POLICY ↗
  • Who funds WITH HONOR ACTION INC ↗
  • Who funds REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS PUBLIC POLICY COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds Yes Every Kid Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE WELCOME PARTY INC ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSHIP NOW PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds NEWDEAL ↗
  • Who funds COMMITTEE ON STATES ↗
  • Who funds STATE DEMOCRACY ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds REPUBLICAN MAIN STREET PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds NEW POLITICS LEADERSHIP ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds LA PROMISE FUND ↗
  • Who funds PROGRESSIVE STATE LEADERS COMMITTEE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sixteen Thirty FundDC15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · National Education Association of the United States

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Confluence Advocacy Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Confluence Advocacy Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Confluence Advocacy Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Confluence Advocacy Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Confluence Advocacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph