Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Concrete Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$923
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$4.0MFood & Nutrition$13kCommunity Improvement$6kArts & Culture$3kRecreation & Sports$2kEnvironment$1kYouth Development$694Human Services$610Other$0
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$923
Median grant
1
States reached
$104M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALBANY COMMUNITY TRUST$923
Individual grant recipient$750
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $719) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%RESOURCE: $25 → 9%NORTHEAST KINGDOM YOUTH SERVICES: $364 → 12%NORTHEAST KINGDOM YOUTH SERVICES: $330 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

1%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$22k · 7 repeat orgs$4.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +71% since the first grant, against +69% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$22k
$4.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+69%

Still filing today

71%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Food & NutritionEnvironmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HARDWICK AREA FOOD PANTRY INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $6k · revenue +71%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR AN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY INC
    3× · 2017–2022 · $6k · revenue +619%
  • PO
    PROTECT OUR WINTERS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k · revenue +661%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIDELITY CHARITABLE - CONCRETE GIVING ACCOUNT
    one grant, 2021 · $4.0M
  • W
    WONDERARTS
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • VF
    VERMONT FARM-TO-SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +69%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cooperation Vermont

The mission of cooperation vermont is to build thriving community economic and enviromental democracy.

Community Improvement
2
Community Harvest of Central Vermont

We bring our community together through gleaning to recover surplus food produced on area farms to feed those with limited access to nutritious, fresh local food, and in the process help the community to gain a greater awareness and…

Food & Nutrition
3
Vermont Farmers Market Education Center

To support the local food system through access, infrastructure and education

Education
4
Vermont Fresh Network Corporation

Advancing relationships among farmers, chefs, and consumers to grow markets and eat more locally grown food.

Community Improvement
5
Alliance for Vermont Communities Inc

The mission of alliance for vermont communities, inc. is to protect working farms, forests and communities of central vermont and to promote responsible development that will sustain the rural heritage and values for present and future…

6
Lamoille Community Food Share Inc

The mission of lamoille community food share is to help support and improve the physical well-being of individuals who might otherwise go hungry. to this end, we provide supplemental food free of charge in a supportive environment,…

Food & Nutrition
7
Cooperation Vermont Community Land Trust

The mission of cooperation vermont community land trust is to reclaim the commons.

Community Improvement
8
Vermont Community Loan Fund

Investing in people and communities to create a just and thriving vermont

Housing & Shelter
9
Vermont Foodbank

To gather and share quality food and nurture partnerships so that no one in vermont will go hungry.

Food & Nutrition
10
Community Capital of Vermont

To help small businesses and lower income entrepreneurs prosper through the provision of flexible business financing.

Community Improvement
11
Willing Hands Enterprises Inc

Willing hands delivers fresh food to more than 80 social service organizations throughout the upper valley of new hampshire and vermont that serve as food access points to our community. fresh food is recovered from local farms, grocery…

Human Services
12
Vermont Council On Rural Development Inc

The Vermont Council on Rural Development helps Vermont citizens build prosperous and resilient communities through democratic engagement, marshalling resources, and collective action.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Salvation Farms Inc and the most unlike its peers is Hardwick Area Food Pantry Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FIDELITY CHARITABLE - CONCRETE GIVING ACCOUNT — $4,000,000 · OtherFIDELITY CHARITABLE - CONCRETE GIVING ACCOUNT+12 more — $8,211 · OtherHARDWICK AREA FOOD PANTRY INC — $5,744 · Food & NutritionVERMONT FARM-TO-SCHOOL INC — $1,000 · Food & NutritionSalvation Farms Inc — $398 · Food & NutritionCENTER FOR AN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY INC — $5,504 · EnvironmentPROTECT OUR WINTERS — $1,472 · EnvironmentALBANY COMMUNITY TRUST INC — $5,715 · Community ImprovementST JOHNSBURY AREA YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU — $694 · Human ServicesRESOURCE A NONPROFIT COMMUNITY ENTERPRISE INC — $25 · Human ServicesTHE WINDOW DRESSERS INC — $200 · Housing & Shelter
Other$4,008,211Food & Nutrition$7,142Environment$6,976Community Improvement$5,715Human Services$719Housing & Shelter$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHARDWICK AREA FOOD PANTRY INC — $5,744 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetALBANY COMMUNITY TRUST INC — $5,715 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetCENTER FOR AN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY INC — $5,504 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS — $1,472 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetVERMONT FARM-TO-SCHOOL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ROWING INC — $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSalvation Farms Inc — $398 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRESOURCE A NONPROFIT COMMUNITY ENTERPRISE INC — $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARDWICK AREA FOOD PANTRY INC
  • Who funds ALBANY COMMUNITY TRUST INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR AN AGRICULTURAL ECONOMY INC
  • Who funds PROTECT OUR WINTERS
  • Who funds VERMONT FARM-TO-SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds ST JOHNSBURY AREA YOUTH SERVICE BUREAU
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ROWING INC
  • Who funds Salvation Farms Inc
  • Who funds THE WINDOW DRESSERS INC
  • Who funds RESOURCE A NONPROFIT COMMUNITY ENTERPRISE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Vermont Community FoundationVT21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Vermont Community Foundation · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · High Meadows Fund Inc · Lintilhac Foundation Inc · National Life Group Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Concrete Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Salvation Farms Inc26% of income from government
  • Center for an Agricultural Economy Inc12% of income from government
  • Vermont Farm-to-School Inc7% of income from government
  • Community Rowing Inc2% of income from government
  • St Johnsbury Area Youth Service Bureau2% of income from government
  • Resource a Nonprofit Community Enterprise Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph