Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Complete College America Inc

Complete College America is a national non-profit organization working with states to significantly improve college completion and to close attainment gaps for underrepresented populations.

$222k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$1.5MCommunity Improvement$35kScience & Tech$10k
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $206k
$10,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Campaign for College Opportunity$25,000
Southern University at Shreveport$10,500
Wallace Community College Selma$10,000
Arkansas State University Mid-South$10,000
Baton Rouge Community College$10,000
Denmark Technical College$10,000
BISHOP STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$10,000
University of Arkansas Pulaski Technical College$10,000
ORANGEBURG-CALHOUN TECHNICAL COLLEGE$10,000
Roxbury Community College$10,000
Florence-Darlington Technical College$10,000
LAWSON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE$10,000
Chattahoochee Valley Community College$10,000
Olive Harvey College$10,000
Shelton State Community College$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 84% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Roxbury Community College: $10k → 16%Inland Empire Economic Partnership Foundation: $10k → 14%Campaign for College Opportunity: $25k → 14%Research Foundation of the City University of New York: $200k → 17%Wiley College: $100k → 16%Langston University: $100k → 12%Florence-Darlington Technical College: $10k → 20%ORANGEBURG-CALHOUN TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $10k → 25%Denmark Technical College: $10k → 28%University of Arkansas Pulaski Technical College: $10k → 17%Arkansas State University Mid-South: $10k → 22%Excelencia in Education: $15k → 14%J F Drake State Community & Technical College: $10k → 11%LAWSON STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $10k → 16%Shelton State Community College: $10k → 17%Trenholm State Community College: $10k → 18%BISHOP STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $10k → 19%Chattahoochee Valley Community College: $10k → 22%Wallace Community College Selma: $10k → 33%Webster University: $10k → 11%William Woods University: $10k → 11%University of Central Missouri: $10k → 14%Missouri State University: $10k → 15%Northwest Missouri State University: $10k → 17%Missouri Western State University: $10k → 18%Harris- Stowe State University: $10k → 21%Greater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development: $15k → 17%Campbell Consulting Services LLC: $10k → 11%Southern Illinois University Edwardsville: $10k → 12%Olive Harvey College: $10k → 14%Mississippi Valley State University: $100k → 34%College of Southern Nevada Foundation Inc: $10k → 13%Baton Rouge Community College: $10k → 19%Southern University at Shreveport: $11k → 22%Xavier University of Louisiana: $215k → 23%Coppin State University: $100k → 19%Research Foundation of the City University of New York: $29k → 17%Excelencia in Education: $15k → 14%Saint Louis Community College: $20k → 11%University of Central Missouri: $10k → 14%Missouri State University: $10k → 15%Northwest Missouri State University: $10k → 17%MISSOURI WESTERN STATE UNIVERSITY: $10k → 18%Harris-Stowe State University: $10k → 21%Southern Illinois University- Edwardsville: $10k → 12%Research Foundation of the City University of New York: $21k → 17%United Negro College Fund: $15k → 14%United Negro College Fund: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
IN
CA
MO
KY
VA
MD
AR
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$470k · 11 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

11 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
13

Total granted

$470k
$819k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+33%

Still filing today

45%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $221k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RF
    Research Foundation of the City University of New York
    3× · 2019–2021 · $250k · revenue +19%
  • UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +74%
  • EI
    EXCELENCIA IN EDUCATION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • XU
    XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA
    one grant, 2022 · $215k · revenue -2%
  • MV
    MISSISSIPPI VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
  • WC
    Wiley Collegegraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +83%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
3
Union Institute & University

Union Institute & University educates highly motivated adults who seek academic programs to engage, enlighten, and empower them to pursue professional goals and a lifetime of learning and service. Offering accredited bachelors, masters,…

4
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
8
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
9
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
10
Xavier University

Xavier is a jesuit catholic university rooted in the liberal arts tradition. our mission is to educate each student intellectually, morally, and spiritually. we create learning opportunities through rigorous academic and professional…

Education
11
Daemen University

Private, independent university providing higher education to students. The mission of Daemen University is to prepare creative, ethically-minded leaders for a diverse and interconnected world by integrating the intellectual strengths…

Education
12
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Xavier University of Louisiana and the most unlike its peers is Wiley College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MISSISSIPPI VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · OtherMISSISSIPPI VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITYLANGSTON UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · OtherLANGSTON UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK — $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKVIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · OtherVIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY+29 more — $361,225 · Other+29 moreResearch Foundation of the City University of New York — $250,000 · EducationResearch Foundation of the City University of New YorkXAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA — $215,000 · EducationXAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANAWiley College — $100,000 · EducationWiley CollegeUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $30,000 · EducationEXCELENCIA IN EDUCATION INC — $30,000 · EducationIndiana University Foundation — $28,650 · EducationCAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY — $25,000 · Education+3 more — $50,000 · Education+3 moreINLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP FOUND ATION — $10,000 · Community ImprovementCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN NEVADA FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Philanthropy
Other$761,225Education$728,650Community Improvement$10,000Philanthropy$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York — $250,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA — $215,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWiley College — $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEXCELENCIA IN EDUCATION INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $28,650 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetWebster University — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONTBONNE UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetINLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP FOUND ATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOLLEGE OF SOUTHERN NEVADA FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Research Foundation of the City University of New York
  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA
  • Who funds Wiley College
  • Who funds UNITED NEGRO COLLEGE FUND INC
  • Who funds EXCELENCIA IN EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds Indiana University Foundation
  • Who funds CAMPAIGN FOR COLLEGE OPPORTUNITY
  • Who funds Webster University
  • Who funds FONTBONNE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Greater Milwaukee Committee for Community Development
  • Who funds INLAND EMPIRE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP FOUND ATION
  • Who funds COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN NEVADA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WILLIAM WOODS UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Folds of Honor FoundationOK27.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Folds of Honor Foundation · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Tulsa Community Foundation · Strada Education Foundation Inc · Educational Credit Management Corporation · Executive Leadership Council · Ingram-White Castle Foundation · Hispanic Scholarship Fund · Women's Foundation of Alabama · National Writing Project Corporation · Ascendium Education Solutions Inc · Corporation for Public Broadcasting

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Complete College America Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Complete College America Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Complete College America Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph