Skip to content

· Private foundation

Compass America Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Health$34kHuman Services$21kEducation$7kPublic Benefit$7kReligion$6kPhilanthropy$5kAnimals$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Salvation Army$3,000
Wounded Warrior$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
VFW$2,000
Tunnels 2 Towers$2,000
Ansar Shrine$1,458
Masonic Charities$1,000
Benld Adopt a Pet$1,000
Coast Gaurd Disaster Fund$1,000
Project Kid Kare$1,000
Mac Co Animal Control$1,000
USO$1,000
Toys for Tots$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
Individual grant recipient$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–21, $100) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Chakota Therapeutic Riding Center: $100 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
SD
IN
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$112k · 24 repeat orgs$12k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +7% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
10

Total granted

$112k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
0%

Still filing today

29%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Public BenefitEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +21%
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +50%
  • PF
    PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $3k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • OR
    OUR RESCUE
    one grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue -30%
  • Feeding America
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue -1%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +74%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Paws of War Inc

To rescue, train and place shelter dogs to serve and provide independence to our veterans & first responders that suffer the traumatic effects of war, and provide essential and supportive services to our heroes in need.

Animals
2
Pets for Patriots Inc

The organization's mission is to transform the lives of veterans by helping them save an at risk shelter dog or cat, and to end all animal homelessness in the us and enrich the lives of men and women who serve, and have served our country.…

Animals
3
Leashes of Valor

Our organization's mission is to raise awareness for and provide physical aid and support to disabled us military veterans. our program covers a crucial gap in the industry-a veteran operated organization, that can assist veterans with…

Public Benefit
4
Pets for Vets Inc

Pets for Vets enriches the lives of veterans by creating a life-changing Super Bond with expertly selected and trained shelter or rescue pets. It provides ongoing expert support to ensure a reciprocal and thriving partnership at no cost to…

Public Benefit
5
Companions for Heroes

To champion public awareness of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and challenges confronting our countrys heroes and rally support for shelter animal adoption by connecting heroes and companions.

Human Services
6
United States War Dogs Association Inc

The mission of the corporation is to provide support for the war dogs of the united states military. the organization provides care packages to war dogs and their handlers serving overseas. the organization also provides support for…

Animals
7
Global War On Terrorism Memorial Foundation

The global war on terrorism memorial foundation is designated by congress to plan, fund, and build the national global war on terrorism memorial on the national mall in washington, d.c., to honor all who have served and sacrificed in the…

Public Benefit
8
National Disaster Search Dog Foundation

Our mission is to strengthen disaster response in america by rescuing and recuiting dogs and partnering them with firefighters and other first responders to find people buried alive in the wreckage of disasters.

Health
9
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
10
Amvets (American Veterans)

Amvets is a veterans service organization whose members, having served or now serving in the u.s. armed forces, are united to uphold and defend the constitution of the united states; to safeguard the principles of freedom, liberty and…

—
11
Disabled American Veterans Dept of Utah

We are dedicated to a single purpose: empowering veterans to lead high-quality lives with respect and dignity. We accomplish this by ensuring that veterans and their families can access the full range of benefits available to them;…

Public Benefit
12
Hero Dogs Inc

Hero Dogs improves the quality of life of our nations heroes and enhances the services of community organizations by placing assistance dogs with customized training & lifetime support.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Amvets National Service Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Gateway 4 Paws. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

USMMA: $33,450 · OtherUSMMATHE SALVATION ARMY: $13,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYWounded Warrior: $7,500 · OtherWounded WarriorVFW: $7,100 · OtherVFWANSAR SHRINERS: $6,594 · OtherANSAR SHRINERSUSO: $6,000 · OtherUSOProject Kid Kare: $4,000 · Other+21 more: $23,904 · Other+21 moreSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,500 · EducationGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $3,000 · Public BenefitJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $2,900 · Public Benefit+1 more: $100 · Public BenefitMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropyOUR RESCUE: $2,000 · Arts & CultureVietnam Veterans Memorial Fund Inc: $100 · Arts & CultureFeeding America: $1,000 · Food & NutritionST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$101,548Education$6,500Public Benefit$6,000Philanthropy$5,000Arts & Culture$2,100Food & Nutrition$1,000Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANSAR SHRINERS: $6,594 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $2,900 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOUR RESCUE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHeritage Foundation Inc: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFeeding America: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGATEWAY 4 PAWS: $1,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetChakota Therapeutic Riding Center NFP: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMVETS NATIONAL SERVICE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVietnam Veterans Memorial Fund Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANSAR SHRINERS ↗
  • Who funds MARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
  • Who funds Heritage Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY 4 PAWS ↗
  • Who funds Chakota Therapeutic Riding Center NFP ↗
  • Who funds AMVETS NATIONAL SERVICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Vietnam Veterans Memorial Fund Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Compass America Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Compass America Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Compass America’s filings →

    More from the funding graph