Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Companion Animal Rescue Effort

To foster and place dogs that are in need of temporary care.

$277k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $227k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FORGOTTEN FRIENDS - MIXED BREED RESCUE$50,000
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE$41,701
FURRY FRIENDS RESCUE$30,000
EQUINE REHABILITATION CENTRAL TEXAS$25,000
POUND PUPPY RESCUE INC$25,000
WINGS OF RESCUE INC$20,000
HUMANE HEROES INC$20,000
WIMBERLEY ADOPTION GROUP AND RESCUE CORPORATION$20,000
BAD RAP$17,500
CALIFORNIA PIT BULL RESCUE$17,500
TAILS OF GRAY$10,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CALIFORNIA PIT BULL RESCUE: $18k → 10%POUND PUPPY RESCUE INC: $25k → 11%CENTRAL CALIFORNIA LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE: $42k → 12%WIMBERLEY ADOPTION GROUP AND RESCUE CORPORATION: $20k → 10%FORGOTTEN FRIENDS - MIXED BREED RESCUE: $50k → 10%BAD RAP: $18k → 10%EQUINE REHABILITATION CENTRAL TEXAS: $25k → 10%TAILS OF GRAY: $10k → 10%HUMANE HEROES INC: $20k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Clouds Rescue
Animals
2
West Houston Animal Rescue

Rescue dogs and other small domestic animals, care for them until they are healthy and adopt them to loving families.

Animals
3
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
4
Forgotten Tails Animal Rescue Inc

Saving dogs

Animals
5
Fred's Mission Rescue and Sanctuary

Rescue dogs, which includes housing, vetting, and transport.

Animals
6
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
7
Rescuesforjojo

Dog rescue

Animals
8
Pippys Pals Rescue

Pippys Pals Rescue is dedicated to saving the lives of dogs facing euthanasia in Houston. Our mission is to provide a second chance to these beloved companions by rescuing them from shelters, providing them with necessary medical care, and…

Animals
9
Shelters and Shelves Rescue Inc

foster based dog rescue working with shelters to save dogs

Animals
10
Where the Wild Things Are Rescue in

The rescue and rehabilitation of canines.

Animals
11
Furever Bully Love Rescue

we rescue last chance shelter dogs that are scheduled to be euthanized

Animals
12
Rescue Coop
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Furry Friends Rescue and the most unlike its peers is Bad Rap. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
2/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

FORGOTTEN FRIENDS MIXED BREED RESCUE — $50,000 · AnimalsFORGOTTEN FRIENDS MIXED BREED RESCUECENTRAL CALIFORNIA LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE — $41,701 · AnimalsCENTRAL CALIFORNIA LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUEFURRY FRIENDS RESCUE — $30,000 · AnimalsFURRY FRIENDS RESCUEEQUINE REHABILITATION CENTRAL TEXAS — $25,000 · AnimalsEQUINE REHABILITATION CENTRAL TEXASPOUND PUPPY RESCUE INC — $25,000 · AnimalsPOUND PUPPY RESCUE INCHumane Heroes Inc — $20,000 · AnimalsHumane Heroes IncWIMBERLEY ADOPTION GROUP AND RESCUE CORPORATION — $20,000 · AnimalsWIMBERLEY ADOPTION GROUP AND RESCUE CORPORATIONWINGS OF RESCUE INC — $20,000 · AnimalsWINGS OF RESCUE INCBAD RAP — $17,500 · AnimalsBAD RAPCalifornia Pit Bull Rescue — $17,500 · AnimalsCalifornia Pit Bull RescueTAILS OF GRAY — $10,000 · Animals
Animals$276,701

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFORGOTTEN FRIENDS MIXED BREED RESCUE — $50,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetCENTRAL CALIFORNIA LABRADOR RETRIEVER RESCUE — $41,701 over 1y, 23% of budgetFURRY FRIENDS RESCUE — $30,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetPOUND PUPPY RESCUE INC — $25,000 over 1y, 32% of budgetHumane Heroes Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWIMBERLEY ADOPTION GROUP AND RESCUE CORPORATION — $20,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetWINGS OF RESCUE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBAD RAP — $17,500 over 1y, 7.2% of budgetCalifornia Pit Bull Rescue — $17,500 over 1y, 19% of budgetTAILS OF GRAY — $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC11.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Companion Animal Rescue Effort funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Companion Animal Rescue Effort?

    Find your warmest path to Companion Animal Rescue Effort through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph