Skip to content
Community Resources and Housing Development Corporation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Community Resources and Housing Development Corporation

COMMUNITY RESOURCES AND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION provides pathways to home and asset building opportunities to benefit low-to-moderate income communities throughout colorado.

$1.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$4.4MHuman Services$1000kEmployment$350kCommunity Improvement$32k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $1,271,314, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,766,612 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $495,298 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $230k
  • $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
$79,244
Median grant
4
States reached
$38M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOUSING AMERICA$1,018,640
TIERRA DEL SOL$91,319
COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO$79,244
COMITE DE BIENESTAR$59,339
RMSER$22,772
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $1000k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO: $309k → 11%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO: $127k → 11%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO: $105k → 11%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO: $95k → 11%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO: $95k → 11%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO: $79k → 11%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO: $77k → 11%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO: $72k → 11%COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO: $40k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
OR
UT
CO
AZ
NM
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.7M · 8 repeat orgs$49k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +117% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$5.7M
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+117%
+5%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TD
    TIERRA DEL SOL HOUSING CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +117%
  • HA
    HOUSING AMERICA CORPORATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +148%
  • CD
    COMITE DE BIEN ESTAR INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • SL
    SAN LUIS VALLEY FARM WORKER HOUSING
    one grant, 2023 · $38k · revenue +5%
  • SL
    Salt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services DBA Neighborworks Salt Lake
    one grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue -16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Human Development Corporation

To promote economic and social advancement of farmworkers and disadvantaged individuals through the provision of education, training, advocacy and services that enhance self-sufficiency.

Human Services
2
Solid Rock Community Developmentcorporation

We are working to build a diverse Southeast Colorado Springs economy that emphasizes the creation of more affordable housing small business development and investment in healthy community environments. Our goal is to address and dismantle…

Human Services
3
New Mexico Housing & Community Development Corporation

The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…

Housing & Shelter
4
Westside Neighborhood Developm

Community development via home ownership and home repair programs. financial literacy education

Community Improvement
5
California Human Development Corporation

California human development is a private, federally recognized 501(c)3 organization and we exist to create paths and opportunities for people to rise above barriers in their pursuit of better lives throughout our northern california…

Human Services
6
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
7
Cplc Nevada Inc

Cplc nevada, inc. is a community development corporation (cdc), committed to building stronger, healthier communities by leading advocate, coalition builder, and direct service provider. (continued on schedule o)cplc nevada, inc. promotes…

Community Improvement
8
California Coalition for Rural Housing Project

The California Coalition for Rural Housing (CCRH) advocates for a thriving rural California by expanding affordable housing opportunitiies for rural, Tribal and farmworker communities. Founded in 1976, CCRH is one of the nation's oldest…

Housing & Shelter
9
Rural Housing Development Corporation

To provide quality affordable housing opportunities to individuals and families living in Utah.

Housing & Shelter
10
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
11
Neighborhood Housing Services of New Haven Inc

Community based housing program designed to stabilize neighborhoods mainly through loans to home owners unable to obtain alternative financing and construction and rehabilitation of housing, related services include technical assistance,…

Housing & Shelter
12
Southwestern Regional Housing and Community Development Corp

The mission of the southwestern regional housing and community development corporation (srhcdc)is to provide affordable housing and housing resources to low and moderate income residents in luna, hidalgo, catron, grant and sierra counties,…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Comite De Bien Estar Inc; the most unlike its peers is Community and Shelter Assistance Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TIERRA DEL SOL HOUSING CORPORATION: $1,615,919 · OtherTIERRA DEL SOL HOUSING CORPORATIONCOMITE DE BIEN ESTAR INC: $1,137,191 · OtherCOMITE DE BIEN ESTAR INC+1 more: $53,127 · OtherHOUSING AMERICA CORPORATION: $1,486,770 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING AMERICA CORPORATION+4 more: $119,144 · Housing & Shelter+4 moreCOMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC: $999,522 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY COUNCIL O…Rocky Mountain Ser Jobs for Progress INC: $350,206 · Employment
Other$2,806,237Housing & Shelter$1,605,914Human Services$999,522Employment$350,206

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTIERRA DEL SOL HOUSING CORPORATION: $1,615,919 over 9y, 10.0% of budgetHOUSING AMERICA CORPORATION: $1,486,770 over 6y, 24% of budgetCOMITE DE BIEN ESTAR INC: $1,137,191 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC: $999,522 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetRocky Mountain Ser Jobs for Progress INC: $350,206 over 9y, 3.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY AND SHELTER ASSISTANCE CORP: $53,127 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetOFFICE OF RURAL AND FARMWORKER HOUSING: $38,369 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetSAN LUIS VALLEY FARM WORKER HOUSING: $37,500 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetGUADALUPE ECONOMIC SERVICES CORPORATION: $31,875 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSalt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services DBA Neighborworks Salt Lake: $11,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Neighborhood Reinvest…Enterprise Community …
Neighborhood Reinvestment CorporationDC13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Resources and Housing Development Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Resources and Housing Development Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Community and Shelter Assistance Corp: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Community Resources and Housing Development Corporation?

Find your warmest path to Community Resources and Housing Development Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Community Resources and Housing Development’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home