· Public charity
Community Resources and Housing Development Corporation
COMMUNITY RESOURCES AND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION provides pathways to home and asset building opportunities to benefit low-to-moderate income communities throughout colorado.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of COMMUNITY RESOURCES AND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 5 grants below total $1,271,314 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,766,612 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $495,298 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $230k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOUSING AMERICA | $1,018,640 |
| TIERRA DEL SOL | $91,319 |
| COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO | $79,244 |
| COMITE DE BIENESTAR | $59,339 |
| RMSER | $22,772 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1000k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +117% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TDTIERRA DEL SOL HOUSING CORPORATION9× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +117%
- HAHOUSING AMERICA CORPORATION6× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +148%
- CDCOMITE DE BIEN ESTAR INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +93%
Funded once
- SLSAN LUIS VALLEY FARM WORKER HOUSINGone grant, 2023 · $38k · revenue +5%
- SLSalt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services DBA Neighborworks Salt Lakeone grant, 2024 · $11k · revenue -16%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote economic and social advancement of farmworkers and disadvantaged individuals through the provision of education, training, advocacy and services that enhance self-sufficiency.
We are working to build a diverse Southeast Colorado Springs economy that emphasizes the creation of more affordable housing small business development and investment in healthy community environments. Our goal is to address and dismantle…
Community development via home ownership and home repair programs. financial literacy education
California human development is a private, federally recognized 501(c)3 organization and we exist to create paths and opportunities for people to rise above barriers in their pursuit of better lives throughout our northern california…
The new mexico housing and community development corporation is successfully promoting the availability and quality of affordable housing for moderate and low income families throughout new mexico through the means of property…
To provide quality affordable housing opportunities to individuals and families living in Utah.
Development of affordable housing
Cplc nevada, inc. is a community development corporation (cdc), committed to building stronger, healthier communities by leading advocate, coalition builder, and direct service provider. (continued on schedule o)cplc nevada, inc. promotes…
Centering those who have been historically oppressed, housing development center, inc. collaborates with its partners to envision, develop, and sustain affordable homes and community places.
Recognizing the vital contribution of farmworkers to our economy, the mission of fhdc is to develop farmworker leadership for stronger and more secure families and communities through affordable housing, social services, education and…
The California Coalition for Rural Housing (CCRH) advocates for a thriving rural California by expanding affordable housing opportunitiies for rural, Tribal and farmworker communities. Founded in 1976, CCRH is one of the nation's oldest…
Low and moderate income housing
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Office of Rural and Farmworker Housing and the most unlike its peers is Guadalupe Economic Services Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TIERRA DEL SOL HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HOUSING AMERICA CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds COMITE DE BIEN ESTAR INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COUNCIL OF IDAHO INC ↗
- Who funds Rocky Mountain Ser Jobs for Progress INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY AND SHELTER ASSISTANCE CORP ↗
- Who funds OFFICE OF RURAL AND FARMWORKER HOUSING ↗
- Who funds SAN LUIS VALLEY FARM WORKER HOUSING ↗
- Who funds GUADALUPE ECONOMIC SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Salt Lake Neighborhood Housing Services DBA Neighborworks Salt Lake ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation · Enterprise Community Partners Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Resources and Housing Development Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Community and Shelter Assistance Corp — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Community Resources and Housing Development Corporation?
Find your warmest path to Community Resources and Housing Development Corporation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.