· Public charity
Community Health Centers of Arkansas
To develop and protect the resources that ensure quality healthcare for all.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 10 grants below total $381,553 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $401,811 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $20,258 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k2 grants · $13k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $122k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $246k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY CLINIC at St Francis House Inc | $75,557 |
| MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC | $60,483 |
| BOSTON MOUNTAIN RURAL HEALTH CENTER INC | $58,872 |
| RIVER VALLEY PRIMARY CARE SERVICE | $51,483 |
| LEE COUNTY COOPERATIVE CLINIC INC | $41,366 |
| 1ST CHOICE HEALTHCARE | $33,654 |
| JEFFERSON COMPREHENSIVE CARE SYSTEMS INC | $28,110 |
| EAST ARKANSAS FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC | $19,156 |
| MID-DELTA HEALTH SYSTEMS INC | $7,272 |
| UAMS | $5,600 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against -10% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- 1C1ST CHOICE HEALTHCARE INC4× · 2022–2025 · $358k · revenue +12%
- SFST FRANCIS HOUSE NWA INC4× · 2022–2025 · $322k · revenue +74%
- EAEAST ARKANSAS FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC4× · 2022–2025 · $293k · revenue +14%
Funded once
- ABARKANSAS BAPTIST COLLEGEone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide superior care to every patient every time.
Healthfirst provides outpatient primary healthcare, behavioral health and dental services to the underserved and uninsured residents of fayette county and surrounding counties in kentucky.
To provide comprehensive primary health care and preventative health services to underserved communities. to serve individuals regardless of their ability to pay.
Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.
We are dedicated to providing quality services that are comprehensive and affordable. we expect services to be delivered compassionately, appropriately, responsibly, safely and efficiently.
Motivated by the love and compassion of christ and in keeping with our baptist heritage, bchs provides quality primary healthcare and behavioral healthcare to individuals in medically underserved communities.
To develop and protect the resources that ensure quality healthcare for all.
Dedicated to providing the highest quality medical services within our power to provide to the people of camden, pulaski, laclede, and miller counties
Horizon health care, inc. provides rural communities with access to high-quality, affordable primary healthcare services.
To provide medical and dental care to under and uninsured patients
Acute care hospital, nursing home, rural health clinic, and home health agency
Health care services are provided to low to moderate income families who are residents of South Texas. Services are provided at a low cost are based on abiilty to pay base. Approximately 18,022 patients were served in the fiscal year.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mainline Health Systems Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds 1ST CHOICE HEALTHCARE INC ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS HOUSE NWA INC ↗
- Who funds EAST ARKANSAS FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds LEE COUNTY COOPERATIVE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds RIVER VALLEY PRIMARY CARE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds MAINLINE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds CABUN RURAL HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ARCARE ↗
- Who funds Boston Mountain Rural Health Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Mid-Delta Health Systems Inc ↗
- Who funds MAIN LINE HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
- Who funds Jefferson Comprehensive Care System Inc ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALTHY CONNECTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS BAPTIST COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arkansas Community Foundation Inc · Delta Dental of Arkansas Foundation Inc · Americares Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Health Centers of Arkansas funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Community Health Centers of Arkansas?
Find your warmest path to Community Health Centers of Arkansas through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.