Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Community Foundation of Pulaski County Inc

Cfpc encourages and administers endowed funds; it makes grants to public charitable organizations and conducts activities to further purposes described both in sections 170(c)(2)(b) and 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

$2.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$65k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF PULASKI COUNTY INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 17 grants below total $398,502 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,563,259 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,164,757 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $57k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $166k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $176k
$17,178
Median grant
2
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE UPTOWN PROJECT INC$65,349
PACE$57,794
MEDARYVILLE WHITE POST VOLUNTEER$52,435
PULASKI COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$30,483
WINAMAC EARLY LEARNING ACADEMY$30,000
Individual grant recipient$28,308
ST LUKE COMMUNITY CHURCH$27,458
PULASKI COUNTY LIBRARY$22,917
PULASKI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$17,178
K-IRPC$10,000
STAR CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT$9,026
WINAMAC AMERICAN LEGION POST 71$8,310
PULASKI ANIMAL CENTER$7,864
WTTW$7,845
WHME-TV$7,845
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $88k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SERVANTS AT WORK: $12k → 16%WINAMAC EARLY LEARNING ACADEMY: $30k → 14%PULASKI ANIMAL CENTER: $14k → 14%PULASKI ANIMAL CENTER: $9k → 14%PULASKI ANIMAL CENTER: $8k → 14%PULASKI ANIMAL CENTER: $7k → 14%PULASKI ANIMAL CENTER: $7k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.7M · 19 repeat orgs$332k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
18

Total granted

$1.7M
$283k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
-1%

Still filing today

42%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UP
    UPTOWN PROJECT INC
    3× · 2018–2024 · $97k · revenue +46%
  • PC
    PULASKI COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $59k · revenue +71%
  • VP
    VFW Post 1728 - VFW IND
    3× · 2020–2023 · $33k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • PC
    PULASKI COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
    one grant, 2022 · $44k
  • FO
    Friends of the Panhandle Pathway Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $43k · revenue -79%
  • MS
    MAIN STREET WINAMAC
    one grant, 2023 · $38k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Perry County Development Corp

Promote development in Perry County, Indiana

2
Community Action Program Inc of Western Indiana

To Develop and Provide resources for the purpose of assisting Low-Income Individuals through a variety of programs in Benton, Fountain, Montgomery, Parke, Vermillion, And Warren Counties in Indiana.

Human Services
3
Indianapolis Parks Foundation Inc

The parks alliance is a leader in developing and sustaining indianapolis parks and greenways by connecting resources to needs to better establish and maintain a safe and thriving community.

Recreation & Sports
4
Wfyi Foundation Inc

WFYI Foundation enables supporters of public media to invest in ensuring ongoing access to excellent information about issues that matter to central Indiana.

Philanthropy
5
West Central Illinois Educational Telecommunications Corporation

Providing public television broadcasting, primarily in educational services, to the West Central Illinois and Northeastern Missouri areas.

6
Metropolitan Indianapolis Public Media Inc

Trusted journalism, inspiring stories and lifelong learning.

Arts & Culture
7
Dunkirk Industrial Development Corp

Promoting economic development in dunkirk, indiana

8
Groundwork Indy Inc

GWIs mission is to foster the sustained regeneration, improvement and management of the environment by developing community-based partnerships which empower people, businesses and organizations to promote environmental, economic & social…

Community Improvement
9
Laporte County Leadership Inc

Leadership training

10
Perry County in Habitat for Humanity Inc

Build or rehabilitate homes for low income families to purchase at cost on interest free mortgages

11
Visit Dubois County Inc

To promote conventions and tourism in Dubois County, Indiana

Community Improvement
12
Tri-County Workforce Investment Board Inc

Activities of tcwib include only those specifically designated under the workforce innovation and opportunity act (wioa).

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifewise Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dda Company Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Development & Eco…Charter and Preparatory Sch…Collegiate Fraternity Chapt…Collegiate Sorority HousingPerforming Arts Organizatio…Christian Service MinistriesFamily Philanthropic Founda…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 17 years old; the field is 21. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%10%<5yr13%17%5–10yr17%24%10–20yr14%14%20–35yr14%17%35–55yr24%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%5%<5yr13%13%5–10yr17%16%10–20yr14%44%20–35yr14%16%35–55yr24%6%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 5% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/32
the rest of the field
12%
1,405/11,419

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
9/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $212,328 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPULASKI COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY — $185,622 · OtherPULASKI COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARYWINAMAC TOWN COUNCIL — $157,558 · OtherWINAMAC TOWN COUNCILPULASKI MEMORIAL HOSPITAL — $141,958 · OtherPULASKI MEMORIAL HOSPITALMEDARYVILLE WHITE POST VOL FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $58,368 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH OF — $53,038 · OtherST LUKE COMMUNITY CHURCH — $46,269 · OtherPULASKI COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT — $43,939 · Other+17 more — $242,780 · Other+17 morePulaski Alliance for Community Education Inc — $472,471 · EducationPulaski Alliance for Commu…UPTOWN PROJECT INC — $96,593 · Community ImprovementTHE CENTER OF WORKFORCE INNOVATIONS INC — $10,000 · Community ImprovementPULASKI COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $59,493 · Arts & CultureWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $13,220 · Arts & CultureNorthwest Indiana Public Broadcasting Inc — $13,220 · Arts & CultureMICHIANA PUBLIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION — $13,220 · Arts & CultureDDA COMPANY FOUNDATION — $5,265 · Arts & CulturePULLASKI ANIMAL CENTER INC — $46,214 · Human ServicesWinamac Early Learning Academy Inc — $30,000 · Human ServicesServants at Work Inc — $11,500 · Human ServicesTrustees of Purdue University — $33,667 · Youth DevelopmentCULVER COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentLIFEWISE INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentFriends of the Panhandle Pathway Inc — $43,475 · Environment
Other$1,141,860Education$472,471Community Improvement$106,593Arts & Culture$104,418Human Services$87,714Youth Development$53,667Environment$43,475

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPulaski Alliance for Community Education Inc — $472,471 over 8y, 98% of budgetUPTOWN PROJECT INC — $96,593 over 3y, 20% of budgetPULASKI COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC — $59,493 over 2y, 12% of budgetPULLASKI ANIMAL CENTER INC — $46,214 over 5y, 19% of budgetFriends of the Panhandle Pathway Inc — $43,475 over 1y, 18% of budgetTrustees of Purdue University — $33,667 over 1y, 19% of budgetVFW Post 1728 - VFW IND — $32,740 over 3y, 14% of budgetWinamac Early Learning Academy Inc — $30,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetWINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC — $13,220 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwest Indiana Public Broadcasting Inc — $13,220 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMICHIANA PUBLIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION — $13,220 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetServants at Work Inc — $11,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCULVER COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetLIFEWISE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CENTER OF WORKFORCE INNOVATIONS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INTREPID PHOENIX INC — $8,028 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetFOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDDA COMPANY FOUNDATION — $5,265 over 1y, 26% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Pulaski Alliance for Community Education Inc
  • Who funds UPTOWN PROJECT INC
  • Who funds PULASKI COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds PULLASKI ANIMAL CENTER INC
  • Who funds Friends of the Panhandle Pathway Inc
  • Who funds Trustees of Purdue University
  • Who funds VFW Post 1728 - VFW IND
  • Who funds Winamac Early Learning Academy Inc
  • Who funds WINDOW TO THE WORLD COMMUNICATIONS INC
  • Who funds Northwest Indiana Public Broadcasting Inc
  • Who funds MICHIANA PUBLIC BROADCASTING CORPORATION
  • Who funds WEST CENTRAL YOUTH LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds Servants at Work Inc
  • Who funds CULVER COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LIFEWISE INC
  • Who funds THE CENTER OF WORKFORCE INNOVATIONS INC
  • Who funds THE INTREPID PHOENIX INC
  • Who funds FOOD FINDERS FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds DDA COMPANY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Northern Indiana Community Foundation IncIN15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Northern Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Marshall County Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Foundation of Pulaski County Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Community Foundation of Pulaski County Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Community Foundation of Pulaski County Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph