Skip to content
Community Foundation of Morgan County at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Community foundation

Community Foundation of Morgan County

The COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MORGAN COUNTY, inc.

$709k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$137k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$175kCommunity Improvement$77kFood & Nutrition$50kYouth Development$39kReligion$36kPublic Safety & Disaster$26kPhilanthropy$23kHealth$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 10 grants below total $371,278, the rows itemized in this filing. The $708,965 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $337,687 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $7k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $176k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $189k
$30,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MSD OF MARTINSVILLE$136,800
MOORESVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY$52,011
CHURCHES IN MISSION$49,800
DESERT ROSE FOUNDATION$42,400
STABILITY FIRST INC$30,000
HEROES WILDLIFE ADVENTURES INC$18,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MORGAN COUNTY INC$15,600
ST MARTIN TOURS SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL$10,000
YOUTH FIRST INC$10,000
CITY OF MARTINSVILLE$6,667
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%DESERT ROSE FOUNDATION: $42k → 9%HEROES WILDLIFE ADVENTURES INC: $18k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$609k · 12 repeat orgs$230k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
13

Total granted

$609k
$107k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+46%

Still filing today

58%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $123k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RO
    REGIONAL OPPORTUNITY INITIATIVES INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $69k · revenue ×65
  • CI
    CHURCH IN MISSION INC
    3× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +127%
  • YF
    YOUTH FIRST
    3× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
  • IU
    Indiana University Health Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $13k · revenue +46%
  • MC
    Mooresville Consolidated School Corp
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana University Health Morgan Inc
—
2
Martin County Senior Citizens Housing Inc

Provide housing for senior citizens of Martin County Indiana

—
3
Indiana County Community Action Program

Provide resources for low income clients.

Human Services
4
Shelter House Community Shelter and Transition Services

Through shelter and housing, advocacy and supportive services, our mission is to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

—
5
Family Promise of Greater Indianapolis Inc

Indianapolis Interfaith Hospitality Network leverages the resources of houses of worship in the greater Indianapolis area to provide emergency shelter, food, case management, and aftercare services to families experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
6
Habitat for Humanity International Wabash County Hfh

Wabash county habitat for humanity, inc. is a non-profit organization working in partnership with god and people everywhere, from all walks of life, to build decent, affordable housing.

—
7
Aurora Inc

Aurora's mission is creating solutions to prevent and end homelessness in our community.

Human Services
8
Cornerstone Montgomery

Empowering people living with mental health and substance use disorders to thrive in their community through collaboration, treatment, education and advocacy.

—
9
Iron County Care and Share

To provide food and shelter to homeless and low-income individuals in the iron county area.

Housing & Shelter
10
Partners in Food and Farming

PIFFs mission is to change the narrative around food and farming in Indiana by increasing farm viability and convening partners for collaborative, systems-level change.

Food & Nutrition
11
Children's Bureau Inc

Empowering individuals to build stronger families and communities.

Human Services
12
Hancock County Food Pantry Inc

Our mission is to secure and distribute food to the needy in an effort to alleviate hunger in indiana.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gleaners Food Bank of Indiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is A&a Township Fire Township Vf. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Metropolitan School District of Martinsville: $166,058 · OtherMetropolitan School District of MartinsvilleMOORESVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $89,655 · OtherMOORESVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARYMOORESVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY: $85,989 · OtherMOORESVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARYCHURCH IN MISSION INC: $60,100 · OtherCHURCH IN MISSION INCWEEKDAY RELIGIOUS EDUCATION: $18,454 · Other+14 more: $133,034 · Other+14 moreREGIONAL OPPORTUNITY INITIATIVES INC: $69,000 · PhilanthropyREGIONAL OPPOR…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MORGAN COUNTY: $37,930 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUN…UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $8,045 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF …DESERT ROSE FOUNDATION INC: $42,400 · Human ServicesHeroes Wildlife Adventures: $18,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH FIRST: $30,000 · HealthIndiana University Health Inc: $13,072 · HealthCENTERSTONE OF INDIANA INC: $7,510 · HealthSTABILITY FIRST INC: $30,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER OF MORGAN COUNT: $19,119 · Housing & ShelterPACK AWAY HUNGER INC: $19,500 · Youth DevelopmentMARTINSVILLE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: $18,835 · Youth DevelopmentSOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ARCHDIOCESAN COUNCIL OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $10,000 · Religion
Other$553,290Philanthropy$114,975Human Services$60,400Health$50,582Housing & Shelter$49,119Youth Development$38,335Religion$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREGIONAL OPPORTUNITY INITIATIVES INC: $69,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetCHURCH IN MISSION INC: $60,100 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetDESERT ROSE FOUNDATION INC: $42,400 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MORGAN COUNTY: $37,930 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetYOUTH FIRST: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPACK AWAY HUNGER INC: $19,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER OF MORGAN COUNT: $19,119 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetMARTINSVILLE YOUTH DEVELOPMENT: $18,835 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetHeroes Wildlife Adventures: $18,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF MORGAN COUNTY INC: $15,600 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetIndiana University Health Inc: $13,072 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $8,045 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTERSTONE OF INDIANA INC: $7,510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA&A Township Fire Township VF: $6,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMORGAN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,575 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kendrick Foundation I…United Way of Central…The Smithville Charit…Lilly Endowment IncDuke Energy FoundationAmerican Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Kendrick Foundation IncIN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kendrick Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · The Smithville Charitable Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Foundation of Morgan County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Foundation of Morgan County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Foundation of Morgan County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home