Skip to content

· Community foundation

Community Foundation of Monroe County

We strive to successfully fulfill our mission by committing to the following values: stewardship, local impact, community partnership, inclusion, and legacy.

$1.5M
Granted FY2026still arriving
13
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$508k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Public Benefit$1.0MHealth$196kPublic Safety & Disaster$192kEducation$149kArts & Culture$122kPhilanthropy$108kHuman Services$83kRecreation & Sports$70kOther$0
02FY2026 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 13 grants below total $649,473, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,541,935 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $892,462 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k5 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $106k
  • $250k+1 grant · $508k
$10,715
Median grant
1
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COUNTY OF MONROE$508,200
ST CHARLES BORROMEO CATHOLIC ACADEMY$23,125
MILAN AREA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$22,238
MILAN AREA SCHOOLS$15,000
MILAN AREA SCHOOLS PTO$13,000
ONE SHEEP MINISTRIES$12,000
RIVER RAISIN CENTER FOR THE ARTS$10,715
THE MONROE TROJAN ACADEMY$10,000
THE FOUNDATION AT MONROE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE$8,200
MILAN MIDDLE SCHOOL$8,000
MONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM$7,000
HEALING HEARTS THERAPUETIC FARM$6,500
COMPASSION MINISTRIES OF MILAN$5,495
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–26, $74k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MONROE FAMILY YMCA: $25k → 10%ONE SHEEP MINISTRIES: $12k → 10%ONE SHEEP MINISTRIES: $12k → 10%MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $11k → 10%MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $7k → 10%MONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 16 repeat orgs$883k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +21% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2026, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
26

Total granted

$2.1M
$792k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+21%

Still filing today

38%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyCrime & LegalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MOVING MILAN FORWARD
    3× · 2022–2025 · $70k · revenue +203% · 59% of their budget
  • AI
    AID IN MILAN
    3× · 2022–2025 · $31k · revenue +24%
  • WA
    WASHTENAW AREA COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • ER
    E4E RELIEF LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $192k · revenue +21%
  • V
    VARIOUS
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2025 · $89k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manistee County Council On Aging

Provide services for senior citizens both through the center and to those with limited resources or homebound.

Human Services
2
Monroe County Sheltercare Inc

To assist at-risk individuals

—
3
Marinette County Committee on Aging Inc

Our mission at Marinette County Elderly Services is to assist older persons in maintaining a longer, healthier, and more fulfilled life.

Human Services
4
Monroe Senior and Community Center

To provide services and programs for residents of monroe, iowa area that promote their wellbeing, support their independence and encourage their involvement in community life.

Human Services
5
Michigan Legal Services

Provide free legal assistance to indigent and low income persons

Crime & Legal
6
Living Independence for Everyone

To provide nutritious meals for senior citizens at home or at a congregate site.

Food & Nutrition
7
The Mon-Arc of Monroe Inc

To promote the general welfare of all persons with disabilities and their families through advocacy counseling education and community program services.

Human Services
8
Monroe City Senior Nutrition Center

To provide services for the elderly

Food & Nutrition
9
Missaukee County Commission On Aging

To provide services and programs that promote wellness and independence and advocate for the life with dignity for the aging population and their caregivers.

Human Services
10
Monroe County Meals On Wheels Inc

Monroe county meals on wheels provides meals to individuals who are substantially homebound due to physical or mental challenges and are unable to shop and/or prepare meals for themselves.

—
11
Marion County Council On Aging

To emphasize the spiritual, mental, physical and social well-being of the senior citizens of marion county.

Human Services
12
Monroe Senior Citizens Center Inc

To provided services to seniors

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Monroe County Opportunity Program; the most unlike its peers is River Raisin Centre for the Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COUNTY OF MONROE: $1,500,000 · OtherCOUNTY OF MONROEVARIOUS: $99,898 · OtherMCOP: $94,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $88,568 · Other+37 more: $792,902 · Other+37 moreE4E RELIEF LLC: $191,672 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONROE MICHIGAN: $25,000 · Human ServicesOne Sheep Ministries: $24,000 · Human ServicesMILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $18,000 · Human ServicesMONROE COUNTY OPPORTUNITY PROGRAM: $7,000 · Human ServicesMOVING MILAN FORWARD: $69,950 · Recreation & SportsBEDFORD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE FOUNDATION AT MONROE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $8,200 · EducationMonroe County Senior Legal Services: $7,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,576,168Public Safety & Disaster$191,672Human Services$74,000Recreation & Sports$69,950Philanthropy$20,000Education$8,200Crime & Legal$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetE4E RELIEF LLC: $191,672 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOVING MILAN FORWARD: $69,950 over 3y, 59% of budgetRIVER RAISIN CENTRE FOR THE ARTS INC: $33,430 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetAID IN MILAN: $30,648 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONROE MICHIGAN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOne Sheep Ministries: $24,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetBEDFORD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetMILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $18,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetWASHTENAW AREA COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN: $12,750 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetMonroe County Senior Legal Services: $7,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds E4E RELIEF LLC ↗
  • Who funds MOVING MILAN FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds RIVER RAISIN CENTRE FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds AID IN MILAN ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONROE MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds One Sheep Ministries ↗
  • Who funds BEDFORD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING ↗
  • Who funds WASHTENAW AREA COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds THE FOUNDATION AT MONROE COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Foundation of Monroe County funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Foundation of Monroe County. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Foundation of Monroe County’s filings →

    More from the funding graph