Skip to content
Plinth

· Community foundation

Community Foundation of Monroe County

We strive to successfully fulfill our mission by committing to the following values: stewardship, local impact, community partnership, inclusion, and legacy.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$992k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 85% of COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MONROE COUNTY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 14 grants below total $1,254,721 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,475,683 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $220,962 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $131k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $89k
  • $250k+1 grant · $992k
$12,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COUNTY OF MONROE$991,800
Individual grant recipient$88,568
CALL FOR BACKUP$35,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
MONROE FAMILY YMCA$25,000
MILAN AREA SCHOOLS - SYMONS PTO$12,000
ONE SHEEP MINISTRIES$12,000
MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING$11,000
RIVER RAISIN CENTRE FOR THE ARTS$10,715
AIRPORT SCHOOLS$9,950
MOVING MILAN FORWARD$9,950
AID IN MILAN$8,648
ST MICHAEL PARISH$7,590
MILAN AREA SCHOOLS PTO$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MONROE FAMILY YMCA: $25k → 10%ONE SHEEP MINISTRIES: $12k → 10%MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $11k → 10%MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING: $7k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

22%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$494k · 13 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
21

Total granted

$494k
$626k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+21%

Still filing today

38%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    MOVING MILAN FORWARD
    3× · 2022–2025 · $70k · revenue +203% · 59% of their budget
  • AI
    AID IN MILAN
    3× · 2022–2025 · $31k · revenue +24%
  • WA
    WASHTENAW AREA COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2022–2024 · $13k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • ER
    E4E RELIEF LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $192k · revenue +21%
  • V
    VARIOUS
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • MC
    MONROE COUNTY INTERMEDIAT SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $69k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manistee County Council On Aging

Provide services for senior citizens both through the center and to those with limited resources or homebound.

Human Services
2
Midland County Council On Aging

Our mission is to promote and enrich quality of life for older adults and those who care for them by collaboratively providing meaningful services and opportunities.

Human Services
3
Marinette County Committee on Aging Inc

Our mission at Marinette County Elderly Services is to assist older persons in maintaining a longer, healthier, and more fulfilled life.

Human Services
4
Michigan Legal Services

Provide free legal assistance to indigent and low income persons

Crime & Legal
5
Mymichigan Home Care

Creating healthy communities - together

6
Missaukee County Commission On Aging

To provide services and programs that promote wellness and independence and advocate for the life with dignity for the aging population and their caregivers.

Human Services
7
Michigan Area Ambulance Service Inc

Provide rural ambulance service to several communities and provide training in the areas of safety and emergency services to ambulance service staff and the general public.

Health
8
Michigan Center of Accountability for Republicans

Social welfare and issue advocacy

Civil Rights
9
Middle Flint Area Council On Aging

Title iii older americans act

10
Community Resolution Center

Providing mediation services for genesee, arenac, bay, clare, gladwin, midland, ogemaw, roscommon, and saginaw counties in michigan court cases.

Housing & Shelter
11
Ann Arbor Community Center Inc

With an emphasis on socio-economically disadvantaged youth and families, the Ann Arbor Community Center, Inc. (AACC) is a vital community resource that provides high quality programs, information and services to citizens in need.

12
Oscoda County Council On Aging

Organized exclusively to plan, operate and coordinate programs, public and private, to promote and safeguard the independence, care, well-being, and security for senior citizens and elderly in oscoda county, michigan.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Milan Seniors for Healthy Living and the most unlike its peers is One Sheep Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

COUNTY OF MONROE — $991,800 · OtherCOUNTY OF MONROEVARIOUS — $99,898 · OtherMCOP — $94,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $88,568 · OtherMONROE COUNTY INTERMEDIAT SCHOOL — $68,650 · Other+30 more — $610,179 · Other+30 moreE4E RELIEF LLC — $191,672 · Public Safety & DisasterE4E RELIE…MOVING MILAN FORWARD — $69,950 · Recreation & SportsTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONROE MICHIGAN — $25,000 · Human ServicesMILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING — $18,000 · Human ServicesOne Sheep Ministries — $12,000 · Human ServicesBEDFORD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyMonroe County Senior Legal Services — $7,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$1,953,895Public Safety & Disaster$191,672Recreation & Sports$69,950Human Services$55,000Philanthropy$20,000Crime & Legal$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetE4E RELIEF LLC — $191,672 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOVING MILAN FORWARD — $69,950 over 3y, 59% of budgetAID IN MILAN — $30,648 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONROE MICHIGAN — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRIVER RAISIN CENTRE FOR THE ARTS INC — $22,715 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetBEDFORD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 73% of budgetMILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING — $18,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetWASHTENAW AREA COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN — $12,750 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetOne Sheep Ministries — $12,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetMonroe County Senior Legal Services — $7,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds E4E RELIEF LLC
  • Who funds MOVING MILAN FORWARD
  • Who funds AID IN MILAN
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF MONROE MICHIGAN
  • Who funds RIVER RAISIN CENTRE FOR THE ARTS INC
  • Who funds BEDFORD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MILAN SENIORS FOR HEALTHY LIVING
  • Who funds WASHTENAW AREA COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds One Sheep Ministries
  • Who funds Monroe County Senior Legal Services

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Community Foundation of Monroe County funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph