Skip to content
Community Care Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Community Care Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$234k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$116k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0175% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$572kInternational$192kReligion$154kPhilanthropy$52kCrime & Legal$24kHuman Services$23kHealth$16kYouth Development$13kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $166k
$5,601
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING$116,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
BHAI MARDANA INSTITUTE OF MUSIC$14,100
KHALSA CARE FOUNDATION$13,100
LOS ALAMITOS EDUCATION FOUNDATION$11,000
KHALSA GURMAT CENTER$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,601
TRANSITIONS IN MOTHERHOOD$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,555
Individual grant recipient$2,500
CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY$2,000
FOOD FINDERS$1,340
Individual grant recipient$353
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–23, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JAKARA MOVEMENT: $500 → 19%DASVANDH NETWORK: $12k → 16%DASVANDH NETWORK: $250 → 8%DASVANDH NETWORK: $550 → 16%ANEKANT COMMUNITY CENTER: $700 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
MI
NY
IN
CA
MD
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 23 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
30

Total granted

$1.1M
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+35%

Still filing today

39%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LA
    Los Alamitos Education Foundation
    8× · 2018–2025 · $109k · revenue +58%
  • CU
    CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $89k · revenue +22%
  • KC
    KHALSA CARE FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $68k · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +35%
  • SH
    SIKH HUMAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -3%
  • TF
    THE FREEDOM BOUND CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -57%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sikh American Legal Defense & Education

The mission of the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund is to empower Sikh Americans through legal assistance, educational outreach, legislative advocacy, and media relations.

Civil Rights
2
Panjab Digital Library Usa

cultural and historical digital archive and library

Arts & Culture
3
Sikh Council On Religion and Education Inc
Religion
4
Guru Nanak Mission Inc

To practice, promote and preach the principles of guru nanak dev ji's message of universal brotherhood as taught by the ten sikh gurus and sri guru granth sahib. the gurudwara sahib was formed to cater to the religious, social and cultural…

Religion
5
Guruji Sangat Northern California

To foster spitirual growth, unity and services to humanity through organizing satsangs,religious events and community programs

Religion
6
Sikh Foundation of Milpitas Milpitas Gurdwara

Religious and Sikh Community Services

Religion
7
Ensaaf

Ensaaf, which means "justice" in many south Asian languages, works to end impunity and achieve justice for crimes against humanity in India, with a focus on Punjab, by documenting abuses, bringing perpetrators to justice, and organizing…

International
8
Khalis Inc

Sikh media and educational resources, education and promotion of sikh culture

Religion
9
Sikh Information Centre

The Sikh Information Centre is based on Sikhi which stresses unity truth and creativity of a personal spiritual enlightenment The organization strives to develop evaluate and disseminate articles programs and social events at a local…

Human Services
10
Kirpal Light Satsang Inc

Kirpal Light Satsang Inc. offers programs and publications that focus on the teachings of Sant Baljit Singh Ji including unity in diversity service to humanity compassion for all a natural lifestyle and devotion to the omnipresent God…

Unclassified
11
Sai Spiritual Foundation

Help establish unity of faith and welcome all spiritual seekers of all religions; realize the Inherent Divinity within as per Sathya SaiBaba

Religion
12
Khalsa Foundation

Khalsa foundation california seeks to empower and advocate for the sikh and punjabi communities in the united states, fostering a sense of belonging and promoting holistic well-being through the sikh way of being. we strive to build a…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Khalsa Gurmat Center; the most unlike its peers is Gurdwara Dashmesh Darbar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
21/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $213,523 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING: $191,000 · OtherMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDINGLos Alamitos Education Foundation: $108,750 · OtherLos Alamitos Education FoundationNanak Prachar Sabha Inc: $53,754 · OtherNanak Prachar Sabha IncIndividual grant recipient: $51,050 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $48,826 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBHAI MARDANA INSTITUTE OF MUSIC: $41,702 · Other+33 more: $112,048 · Other+33 moreCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $89,000 · EducationCHAPMAN UNIVERS…SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $64,229 · EducationSCHOOL ON WHEEL…SIKH HUMAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationSIKH HUMAN DEVE…KHALSA CARE FOUNDATION: $68,350 · ReligionKHALSA CA…KHALSA GURMAT CENTER: $30,000 · ReligionKHALSA GU…+2 more: $851 · ReligionRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $40,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyYOUTH JUSTICE COALITION INC: $24,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $10,195 · Youth DevelopmentDASVANDH NETWORK: $12,400 · Human ServicesANEKANT COMMUNITY CENTER: $700 · Human ServicesJAKARA MOVEMENT: $500 · Human ServicesTHE FREEDOM BOUND CENTER: $6,500 · Community ImprovementCANGRESS DBA LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $2,000 · Community Improvement
Other$820,653Education$163,229Religion$99,201Philanthropy$41,000Youth Development$34,195Human Services$13,600Community Improvement$8,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLos Alamitos Education Foundation: $108,750 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY: $89,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKHALSA CARE FOUNDATION: $68,350 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC: $64,229 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetNanak Prachar Sabha Inc: $53,754 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetRenaissance Charitable Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKHALSA GURMAT CENTER: $30,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetYOUTH JUSTICE COALITION INC: $24,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDASVANDH NETWORK: $12,400 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $10,195 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIKH HUMAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE FREEDOM BOUND CENTER: $6,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SIKH COALITION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCANGRESS DBA LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPRATHAM USA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGURDWARA DASHMESH DARBAR: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANEKANT COMMUNITY CENTER: $700 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJAKARA MOVEMENT: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR HAITI INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeal Beach Police Officers Association: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetWE ARE GROUNDSWELL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSikh Center Of The Orange County: $101 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Los Alamitos Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds KHALSA CARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds Nanak Prachar Sabha Inc ↗
  • Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds KHALSA GURMAT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH JUSTICE COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds DASVANDH NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds SIKH HUMAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FREEDOM BOUND CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AIDS Services Foundation Orange County ↗
  • Who funds THE SIKH COALITION ↗
  • Who funds CANGRESS DBA LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FINDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds GURDWARA DASHMESH DARBAR ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dasvandh NetworkThe California Endowm…Ik ManzilGurmehar FoundationCalifornia Community …Weingart FoundationTides FoundationAmalgamated Charitabl…Silicon Valley Commun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Network for GoodAmerican Online Givin…
Dasvandh NetworkTX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dasvandh Network · The California Endowment · Ik Manzil · Gurmehar Foundation · California Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Care Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Care Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Hope for Haiti Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Community Care’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home