· Private foundation
Community Care Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $48k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $166k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING | $116,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| BHAI MARDANA INSTITUTE OF MUSIC | $14,100 |
| KHALSA CARE FOUNDATION | $13,100 |
| LOS ALAMITOS EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $11,000 |
| KHALSA GURMAT CENTER | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,601 |
| TRANSITIONS IN MOTHERHOOD | $4,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,555 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,500 |
| CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY | $2,000 |
| FOOD FINDERS | $1,340 |
| Individual grant recipient | $353 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
23 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LALos Alamitos Education Foundation8× · 2018–2025 · $109k · revenue +58%
- CUCHAPMAN UNIVERSITY6× · 2020–2025 · $89k · revenue +22%
- KCKHALSA CARE FOUNDATION8× · 2018–2025 · $68k · revenue +37%
Funded once
- BGBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICAgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +35%
- SHSIKH HUMAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -3%
- TFTHE FREEDOM BOUND CENTERone grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue -57%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the Sikh American Legal Defense and Education Fund is to empower Sikh Americans through legal assistance, educational outreach, legislative advocacy, and media relations.
cultural and historical digital archive and library
To practice, promote and preach the principles of guru nanak dev ji's message of universal brotherhood as taught by the ten sikh gurus and sri guru granth sahib. the gurudwara sahib was formed to cater to the religious, social and cultural…
To foster spitirual growth, unity and services to humanity through organizing satsangs,religious events and community programs
Religious and Sikh Community Services
Ensaaf, which means "justice" in many south Asian languages, works to end impunity and achieve justice for crimes against humanity in India, with a focus on Punjab, by documenting abuses, bringing perpetrators to justice, and organizing…
Sikh media and educational resources, education and promotion of sikh culture
The Sikh Information Centre is based on Sikhi which stresses unity truth and creativity of a personal spiritual enlightenment The organization strives to develop evaluate and disseminate articles programs and social events at a local…
Kirpal Light Satsang Inc. offers programs and publications that focus on the teachings of Sant Baljit Singh Ji including unity in diversity service to humanity compassion for all a natural lifestyle and devotion to the omnipresent God…
Help establish unity of faith and welcome all spiritual seekers of all religions; realize the Inherent Divinity within as per Sathya SaiBaba
Khalsa foundation california seeks to empower and advocate for the sikh and punjabi communities in the united states, fostering a sense of belonging and promoting holistic well-being through the sikh way of being. we strive to build a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Khalsa Gurmat Center and the most unlike its peers is Gurdwara Dashmesh Darbar. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Los Alamitos Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds KHALSA CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL ON WHEELS INC ↗
- Who funds Nanak Prachar Sabha Inc ↗
- Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds KHALSA GURMAT CENTER ↗
- Who funds YOUTH JUSTICE COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds DASVANDH NETWORK ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds SIKH HUMAN DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FREEDOM BOUND CENTER ↗
- Who funds AIDS Services Foundation Orange County ↗
- Who funds CANGRESS DBA LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK ↗
- Who funds THE SIKH COALITION ↗
- Who funds FOOD FINDERS INC ↗
- Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds PRATHAM USA ↗
- Who funds GURDWARA DASHMESH DARBAR ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dasvandh Network · The California Endowment · Ik Manzil · Gurmehar Foundation · California Community Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Tides Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Care Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hope for Haiti Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.