Skip to content
Community Capital New York Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Community Capital New York Inc

Community capital is a nonprofit lender that has revitalized communities and transformed lives in the mid-hudson valley, bronx and fairfield county, ct for 36 years.

$30k
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Community Improvement$234kHousing & Shelter$222kEnvironment$67kHealth$10kRecreation & Sports$10k
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $28,320, the rows itemized in this filing. The $30,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $1,680 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$22,781
Median grant
1
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TCB DEERHAUNT ROAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP$22,781
MOUNT HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION$5,539
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NFW GROUP DBA DUBOIS STREET ASSOCIATES II: $67k → 6%ALLIED COMMUNITY ENTERPRISES: $15k → 6%JUDITH LYNN STRANSKY DBA CENTER FOR AUTHENTIC LIVING: $10k → 9%APROPOS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISES INC: $5k → 9%SAFE HARBORS OF THE HUDSON INC: $50k → 14%TCB DEERHAUNT ROAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $23k → 17%CYNTHIA DELCONTE DBA DAY FOR NIGHT PRODUCTIONS: $10k → 9%APROPOS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MANAGEMENT ENTERPRISES INC: $5k → 9%NEWBURGH COMMUNITY LAND BANK: $28k → 14%JEANNE A STARK DBA HUDSON VALLEY CEREMONIES: $10k → 9%NEW YORK COVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $9k → 9%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER NEWBURGH: $13k → 14%EL GALLITO: $10k → 9%NEW YORK COVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $9k → 9%NOAH'S ARK: $10k → 9%MOUNT HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $6k → 9%THE GREAT STUDIO: $10k → 9%HOUSING ACTION COUNCIL: $11k → 9%EMPIRE MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION: $10k → 9%CARING FOR THE HUNGRY AND HOMELESS OF PEEKSKILL INC: $25k → 9%MYSTIC CAFE: $10k → 9%HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC: $6k → 9%KP KATERING: $8k → 9%HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC: $5k → 9%HUDSON RIVER YOGA LLC: $6k → 9%HUDSON TODD LLC: $12k → 9%DEX SUPPORT: $10k → 9%ROYAL CREPES: $10k → 9%BEAHIVE: $10k → 9%BEACON SOUNDWORKS: $10k → 9%MAIN STREET BEAUTY SALON: $10k → 9%BRIGHT SMILES OF BEACON: $10k → 9%ORCA EMPIRE FITNESS LLC: $10k → 9%EVERY LITTLE DETAIL WEDDING AND EVENT PLANNING: $10k → 9%JG DANCE INC: $10k → 9%PATHWAYS OF LEARNINGS: $10k → 9%LALA ENTERPRISES: $10k → 9%RG TOWING INC: $10k → 9%HPS AFFINITY LLC: $10k → 9%36 RAYMOND AVENUE: $10k → 9%HOPEWELL ORTHODONTICS PC: $10k → 9%FLOOR 13 TEXTILES: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

7%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 3 repeat orgs$503k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
34

Total granted

$40k
$475k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-47%
+8%

Still filing today

100%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
Housing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NY
    NEW YORK COVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOP CORP
    2× · 2017–2018 · $19k · revenue -47% · 44% of their budget
  • HA
    HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $11k · revenue -83%
  • AH
    APROPOS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MGMT ENTERPRISES INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • NG
    NFW GROUP DBA DUBOIS STREET ASSOCIATES II
    one grant, 2019 · $67k
  • SH
    SAFE HARBORS OF THE HUDSON INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +37%
  • NC
    NEWBURGH COMMUNITY LAND BANK
    one grant, 2017 · $28k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hudson Community Living Company
Housing & Shelter
2
New York Housing Conference Inc

NYHCs mission is to advance City, State and Federal policies and funding to support the development and preservation of decent and affordable housing for all New Yorkers. NYHC is a nonprofit affordable housing policy and advocacy…

Housing & Shelter
3
Community Housing Council
Housing & Shelter
4
Habitat Community Housing Development Inc

Development of affordable housing

—
5
Habitat for Humanity New York City and Westcherster County Inc

Habitat for humanity new york city and westchester county transforms lives and communities by building and preserving affordable homes with families in need, and by uniting all new yorkers around the cause of affordable housing.

Housing & Shelter
6
Community Capital Resources Housing Development Fund Corporation

To create affordable housing opportunities throughout the hudson valley, new york region through acquisition, development and management of housing development projects for persons of low to moderate income.

—
7
Homestead Development Corporation

To construct affordable energy efficient housing for purchase by essential workers in the Village of Lake Placid, New York and the town of North Elba, New York in order to preserve a community lifestyle in an otherwise transient…

Housing & Shelter
8
Livingston County Habitat for Humanity Inc

Habitat seeks to eliminate substandard housing by committing to help local, low-income families finance and construct their own affordable homes

—
9
Affordable Housing Corporation
Housing & Shelter
10
Covenant Housing Corporation of Central

To encourage greater independence, inclusion, choice and community integration through the development of safe, affordable, accessible housing options for low and very-low income households and individuals with disabilities.

Unclassified
11
Matinecock Court Housing Development Fund Corporation

To construct, operate, and maintain a low income housing development

Housing & Shelter
12
Neighborhood Renewal Housing Development Fund Corporation

The corporation is organized exclusively for the purpose of perserving and creating, on a non-profit basis, housing projects for persons of low and moderate income. in addition to promoting affordable housing opportunities, it seeks to…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Harbors of the Hudson Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mount Hope Community Development Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/10
Grantees still filing
4/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NFW GROUP DBA DUBOIS STREET ASSOCIATES II: $67,282 · OtherNFW GROUP DBA DUBOIS STREET ASSOCIATES IICARING FOR THE HOMELESS OF PEEKSKILL INC: $25,000 · OtherCARING FOR THE HOMELESS OF PEEKSKILL INCTCB DEERHAUNT ROAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP: $22,781 · OtherTCB DEERHAUNT ROAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP+28 more: $278,772 · Other+28 moreSAFE HARBORS OF THE HUDSON INC: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterSAFE HARBORS OF THE H…ALLIED COMMUNITY ENTERPRISES INC: $15,250 · Housing & ShelterALLIED COMMUNITY ENTE…HOUSING ACTION COUNCIL INC: $11,268 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING ACTION COUNCI…HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC: $11,250 · Housing & ShelterHASTINGS-ON-HUDSON AF…APROPOS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MGMT ENTERPRISES INC: $10,251 · Housing & ShelterAPROPOS HOUSING OPPOR…MOUNT HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $5,539 · Housing & ShelterMOUNT HOPE COMMUNITY …NEWBURGH COMMUNITY LAND BANK: $27,546 · Community ImprovementNEWBURGH …NEW YORK COVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOP CORP: $18,560 · Community ImprovementNEW YORK …
Other$393,835Housing & Shelter$103,558Community Improvement$46,106

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAFE HARBORS OF THE HUDSON INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetNEWBURGH COMMUNITY LAND BANK: $27,546 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCARING FOR THE HOMELESS OF PEEKSKILL INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetNEW YORK COVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOP CORP: $18,560 over 2y, 44% of budgetALLIED COMMUNITY ENTERPRISES INC: $15,250 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER NEWBURGH INC: $12,745 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOUSING ACTION COUNCIL INC: $11,268 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAPROPOS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MGMT ENTERPRISES INC: $10,251 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAFE HARBORS OF THE HUDSON INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWBURGH COMMUNITY LAND BANK ↗
  • Who funds CARING FOR THE HOMELESS OF PEEKSKILL INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK COVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOP CORP ↗
  • Who funds ALLIED COMMUNITY ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER NEWBURGH INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING ACTION COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds APROPOS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MGMT ENTERPRISES INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation…American Online Givin…Amazonsmile Foundation
The Pfizer Foundation IncNY5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Capital New York Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Capital New York Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Capital New York’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home