· Public charity
Community Capital New York Inc
Community capital is a nonprofit lender that has revitalized communities and transformed lives in the mid-hudson valley, bronx and fairfield county, ct for 36 years.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 2 grants below total $28,320 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $30,000 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,680 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TCB DEERHAUNT ROAD LIMITED PARTNERSHIP | $22,781 |
| MOUNT HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION | $5,539 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–22) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 85% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
3 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NYNEW YORK COVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOP CORP2× · 2017–2018 · $19k · revenue -47% · 44% of their budget
- HAHASTINGS-ON-HUDSON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC2× · 2017–2020 · $11k · revenue -83%
- AHAPROPOS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MGMT ENTERPRISES INC2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +61%
Funded once
- NGNFW GROUP DBA DUBOIS STREET ASSOCIATES IIone grant, 2019 · $67k
- SHSAFE HARBORS OF THE HUDSON INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue +37%
- NCNEWBURGH COMMUNITY LAND BANKone grant, 2017 · $28k · revenue +8%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
NYHCs mission is to advance City, State and Federal policies and funding to support the development and preservation of decent and affordable housing for all New Yorkers. NYHC is a nonprofit affordable housing policy and advocacy…
Development of affordable housing
Habitat for humanity new york city and westchester county transforms lives and communities by building and preserving affordable homes with families in need, and by uniting all new yorkers around the cause of affordable housing.
To create affordable housing opportunities throughout the hudson valley, new york region through acquisition, development and management of housing development projects for persons of low to moderate income.
To construct affordable energy efficient housing for purchase by essential workers in the Village of Lake Placid, New York and the town of North Elba, New York in order to preserve a community lifestyle in an otherwise transient…
Habitat seeks to eliminate substandard housing by committing to help local, low-income families finance and construct their own affordable homes
To encourage greater independence, inclusion, choice and community integration through the development of safe, affordable, accessible housing options for low and very-low income households and individuals with disabilities.
To construct, operate, and maintain a low income housing development
The corporation is engaged in encouraging the cooperative efforts of neighborhood representatives, government and participating lending institutions in a combined effort to stem the decline and deterioration of the housing within the city…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Harbors of the Hudson Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mount Hope Community Development Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAFE HARBORS OF THE HUDSON INC ↗
- Who funds NEWBURGH COMMUNITY LAND BANK ↗
- Who funds CARING FOR THE HOMELESS OF PEEKSKILL INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK COVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOP CORP ↗
- Who funds ALLIED COMMUNITY ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER NEWBURGH INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING ACTION COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds HASTINGS-ON-HUDSON AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds APROPOS HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES AND MGMT ENTERPRISES INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community Capital New York Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.