Skip to content
Community-Campus Partnerships for Health at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Community-Campus Partnerships for Health

To promote health equity and social justice through partnerships between communities and academic institutions.

$236k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Human Services$129kHealth$118kReligion$116kPublic Benefit$60kYouth Development$59kFood & Nutrition$50kCommunity Improvement$42kEducation$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 12 grants below total $144,780, the rows itemized in this filing. The $236,030 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $91,250 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $9k
  • $10k–50k11 grants · $136k
$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$700k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EBC ATOM A TOTAL OUTREACH MINISTRY$15,000
ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER AND$15,000
SHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH$15,000
OLD NORTH STATE MEDICAL FOUNDATION$15,000
GOLDSBORO RALEIGH DISTRICT ASSEMBLY$13,640
FUTURE ENDEAVORS LIFE PROGRAM$12,500
PELETAH MINISTRIES$10,000
TYRRELL COUNTY CDC$10,000
MOUNT CARMEL HELPS INC$10,000
CRAVEN TERRACE CHARITIES INC$10,000
MT CALVARY CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP$10,000
LET'S MAKE IT HAPPEN TOGETHER$8,640
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%OLD NORTH STATE MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $50k → 12%SHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $15k → 20%OLD NORTH STATE MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $15k → 12%JONES COUNTY COMMUNITY HOPE: $9k → 17%SHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGE: $9k → 20%EL PUEBLO INC: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$408k · 11 repeat orgs$231k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +128% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
17

Total granted

$408k
$206k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+128%
+22%

Still filing today

55%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPublic BenefitYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MT CALVARY LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +50%
  • FE
    FUTURE ENDEAVORS LIFE PROGRAM
    3× · 2022–2024 · $32k · revenue +128%
  • SF
    SHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $24k · revenue +244%

Funded once

  • CM
    CORNERSTONE MINISTRIES OF GREENVILLE NC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • JC
    Jones County Community Development
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -98% · 74% of their budget
  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BLACK VETERANS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Restoring Hope Center Inc

Restoring Hope Center, Inc. is a benovolence organization operating in Laurinburg, NC. The organization has benevolence programs providing food and supplies to the local area, supplies other smaller like-kind organizations, conducts a…

Human Services
2
Pitt County Indigent Care Clinic Inc

We are a medical student operated free clinic with on-site faculty supervision, serving the uninsured population of Pitt and surrounding counties in eastern North Carolina. We mainly provide chronic care services for uninsured patients…

Health
3
The Help Center Nc

Our mission is to provide free resources to low income and no income families,senior and homeless population within the 7 counties NC- Vance Granville,Franklin,Warren,Wake,Raliegh ,Durham and Halifax communities.

Food & Nutrition
4
Total Life Center of Southside Virginia

The Total Life Center of Southside Virginia is organized to improve health outcomes and advance health equity in rural communities by addressing social determinants of health. The organization provides programs that increase access to…

Human Services
5
North Carolina Empowerment Organization
Civil Rights
6
Eastern Shore Wellness Solutions Inc

Community based health education, self-management training and the reduction of the social determinants that negatively impact health outcomes program services

Health
7
East African Healthcare Network

Our mission is help and provide food for the most marginalized community

Human Services
8
MedAssist of Mecklenburg Dba Nc Medassist

NC MedAssist is a nonprofit pharmacy program providing access to lifesaving prescription medications, client support, advocacy and other services to poor, vulnerable, and uninsured North Carolina residents.

Human Services
9
House of Hope North Charleston

To reduce hunger and poverty in the Tri-County Area by providing individuals and families with food, clothing, shelter, resource and spiritual support while striving to employ, educate and empower.

Food & Nutrition
10
Hunger Coalition of Transylvania Co

Increase access to food and combat hunge

Food & Nutrition
11
Hickory County Cares

Food distribution to the needy

Human Services
12
My Health Matters Inc

A non for profit organization providing free health services, health screening and health education services for the underserved communities and minorities. We combine these services with advocating for healthy lifestyles, healthy living…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mt Calvary Leadership Development Corporation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mount Carmel Helps Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER AND: $60,000 · OtherALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER ANDCORNERSTONE MINISTRIES OF GREENVILLE NC: $50,000 · OtherCORNERSTONE MINISTRIES OF GREENVILLE NCTYRRELL COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $24,000 · OtherTYRRELL COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONGOLDSOBORO-RALEIGH DISTRICT ASSEMBLY OF CHURCHES OF CHRIST: $22,640 · OtherGOLDSOBORO-RALEIGH DISTRICT ASSEMBLY OF CHURCHES OF CHRIS…PELETAH MINISTRIES: $19,000 · OtherPELETAH MINISTRIESLETS MAKE IT HAPPEN TOGETHER INCORPORATED: $17,640 · OtherLETS MAKE IT HAPPEN TOGETHER INCORPORATEDALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER AND: $15,000 · Other+12 more: $118,000 · Other+12 moreOld North State Medical Foundation: $65,000 · Human ServicesOld North State Med…SHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesSHACKLE FREE COMMUN…EL PUEBLO INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesEL PUEBLO INCJONES COUNTY COMMUNITY HOPE INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesJONES COUNTY COMMUN…EBC-ATOM(A TOTAL OUTREACH MINISTRY)PROJECT: $65,000 · Food & NutritionEBC-ATOM(A …MT CALVARY LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $60,000 · Public BenefitMT CALVARY…FUTURE ENDEAVORS LIFE PROGRAM: $31,500 · Youth DevelopmentNARIAHS WAY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthCommunity Health Coalition: $10,000 · HealthGOSHEN MEDICAL CENTER INC: $9,000 · HealthMOUNT CARMEL HELPS INC: $19,000 · Religion
Other$326,280Human Services$108,000Food & Nutrition$65,000Public Benefit$60,000Youth Development$31,500Health$29,000Religion$19,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOld North State Medical Foundation: $65,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetEBC-ATOM(A TOTAL OUTREACH MINISTRY)PROJECT: $65,000 over 2y, 95% of budgetMT CALVARY LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC: $60,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetFUTURE ENDEAVORS LIFE PROGRAM: $31,500 over 3y, 23% of budgetSHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY INC: $24,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetMOUNT CARMEL HELPS INC: $19,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetJones County Community Development: $10,000 over 1y, 74% of budgetNARIAHS WAY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 8.4% of budgetOpportunities Industrialization Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEL PUEBLO INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCommunity Health Coalition: $10,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetThe Greenville Community Shelters: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY TECHNICAL ASSITANCE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJONES COUNTY COMMUNITY HOPE INC: $9,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetGOSHEN MEDICAL CENTER INC: $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nc Counts CoalitionBlueprint North Carol…Z Smith Reynolds Foun…The Conservation Fund…North Carolina Commun…Amazonsmile Foundation
Nc Counts CoalitionNC30.4× affinity12 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nc Counts Coalition · Blueprint North Carolina · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community-Campus Partnerships for Health funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community-Campus Partnerships for Health. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Community-Campus Partnerships for Health?

    Find your warmest path to Community-Campus Partnerships for Health through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $17k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community-Campus Partnerships for Health’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home