· Public charity
Community-Campus Partnerships for Health
To promote health equity and social justice through partnerships between communities and academic institutions.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $144,780 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $236,030 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $91,250 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $9k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $136k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ALTERNATIVE LEARNING CENTER AND | $15,000 |
| EBC ATOM A TOTAL OUTREACH MINISTRY | $15,000 |
| OLD NORTH STATE MEDICAL FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| SHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH | $15,000 |
| GOLDSBORO RALEIGH DISTRICT ASSEMBLY | $13,640 |
| FUTURE ENDEAVORS LIFE PROGRAM | $12,500 |
| MT CALVARY CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP | $10,000 |
| CRAVEN TERRACE CHARITIES INC | $10,000 |
| MOUNT CARMEL HELPS INC | $10,000 |
| TYRRELL COUNTY CDC | $10,000 |
| PELETAH MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| LET'S MAKE IT HAPPEN TOGETHER | $8,640 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $108k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +128% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
11 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMT CALVARY LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC2× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +7%
- FEFUTURE ENDEAVORS LIFE PROGRAM3× · 2022–2024 · $32k · revenue +128%
- SFSHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY INC2× · 2022–2024 · $24k · revenue +244%
Funded once
- CMCORNERSTONE MINISTRIES OF GREENVILLE NCone grant, 2022 · $50k
Community Health Coalitiongraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +80%- OIOpportunities Industrialization Center Incone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +22%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Restoring Hope Center, Inc. is a benovolence organization operating in Laurinburg, NC. The organization has benevolence programs providing food and supplies to the local area, supplies other smaller like-kind organizations, conducts a…
To reduce hunger and poverty in the Tri-County Area by providing individuals and families with food, clothing, shelter, resource and spiritual support while striving to employ, educate and empower.
Our mission is to provide free resources to low income and no income families,senior and homeless population within the 7 counties NC- Vance Granville,Franklin,Warren,Wake,Raliegh ,Durham and Halifax communities.
Increase access to food and combat hunge
Food distribution to the needy
To promote community based primary health care systems in medically underserved areas.
The Total Life Center of Southside Virginia is organized to improve health outcomes and advance health equity in rural communities by addressing social determinants of health. The organization provides programs that increase access to…
Our mission is help and provide food for the most marginalized community
We are a medical student operated free clinic with on-site faculty supervision, serving the uninsured population of Pitt and surrounding counties in eastern North Carolina. We mainly provide chronic care services for uninsured patients…
Community based health education, self-management training and the reduction of the social determinants that negatively impact health outcomes program services
NC MedAssist is a nonprofit pharmacy program providing access to lifesaving prescription medications, client support, advocacy and other services to poor, vulnerable, and uninsured North Carolina residents.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mt Calvary Leadership Development Corporation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mount Carmel Helps Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 12 years old; the field is 12. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 10% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Old North State Medical Foundation ↗
- Who funds EBC-ATOM(A TOTAL OUTREACH MINISTRY)PROJECT ↗
- Who funds MT CALVARY LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC ↗
- Who funds FUTURE ENDEAVORS LIFE PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds SHACKLE FREE COMMUNITY OUTREACH AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT CARMEL HELPS INC ↗
- Who funds Community Health Coalition ↗
- Who funds Opportunities Industrialization Center Inc ↗
- Who funds EL PUEBLO INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TECHNICAL ASSITANCE INC ↗
- Who funds The Greenville Community Shelters ↗
- Who funds NARIAHS WAY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Jones County Community Development ↗
- Who funds GOSHEN MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds JONES COUNTY COMMUNITY HOPE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nc Counts Coalition · Blueprint North Carolina · Z Smith Reynolds Foundation Inc · The Conservation Fund a Nonprofit Corporation · North Carolina Community Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Community-Campus Partnerships for Health funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Community-Campus Partnerships for Health?
Find your warmest path to Community-Campus Partnerships for Health through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.