Skip to content

· Public charity

Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc

COMMUNITY ACTION PROJECT OF TULSA COUNTY INC.'s (cap tulsa) mission is to help young children in lower-income families grow up and achieve economic success.

$18M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$80MHuman Services$5.7MHousing & Shelter$2.2M
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 11 grants below total $15,268,753, the rows itemized in this filing. The $17,516,375 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,247,622 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $719k
  • $250k+4 grants · $14M
$189,930
Median grant
1
States reached
$71M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULSA EDUCARE INC$10,095,664
UNION PUBLIC SCHOOLS$2,683,806
SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC$1,431,924
THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA$258,019
CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC$218,103
CROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVIVCES INC$189,930
LIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY$183,829
TULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$127,400
PLAY HARD LLC$33,244
UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC$26,743
GROWING TOGETHER INC$20,091
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $15.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%CROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVIVCES INC: $219k → 13%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1.4M → 16%UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $27k → 17%LITTLE DIXIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $192k → 24%CROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVIVCES INC: $218k → 13%TULSA CHILDREN'S COALITION INC: $500k → 15%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1.3M → 16%LIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $189k → 24%CROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVIVCES INC: $197k → 13%THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $284k → 15%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1.0M → 16%LIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $188k → 24%CROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVIVCES INC: $190k → 13%THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $280k → 15%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1.0M → 16%LIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $184k → 24%CROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVIVCES INC: $171k → 13%THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $272k → 15%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1.0M → 16%LIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY: $182k → 24%CROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVIVCES INC: $169k → 13%THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $261k → 15%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $983k → 16%LITTLE DIXIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $177k → 24%CROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVIVCES INC: $166k → 13%THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $258k → 15%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $744k → 16%LITTLE DIXIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $158k → 24%THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $252k → 15%SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $563k → 16%LITTLE DIXIE COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $144k → 24%THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $237k → 15%THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $178k → 15%GROWING TOGETHER INC: $105k → 15%GROWING TOGETHER INC: $41k → 15%GROWING TOGETHER INC: $38k → 15%GROWING TOGETHER INC: $32k → 15%GROWING TOGETHER INC: $21k → 15%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $224k → 15%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $223k → 15%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $220k → 15%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $218k → 15%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $213k → 15%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $211k → 15%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $211k → 15%CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $189k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $76k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $74k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$86M · 14 repeat orgs$1.9M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +101% since the first grant, against -7% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$86M
$1.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+101%
-7%

Still filing today

71%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TE
    TULSA EDUCARE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $53M · revenue +116% · 41% of their budget
  • SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $8.1M · revenue +101%
  • TY
    THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +110%

Funded once

  • TC
    TULSA COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1.3M · revenue -95% · 82% of their budget
  • TC
    TULSA CHILDREN'S COALITION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $500k · revenue -7% · 26% of their budget
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc

Community action project of tulsa county inc.'s (cap tulsa) mission is to help young children in lower-income families grow up and achieve economic success.

Human Services
2
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
3
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
4
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
5
Fcc Child Development Center Inc Dba Growing Kidz

The fcc child development center (cdc) opened its doors september 8, 1987 with the primary purpose of providing quality childcare to those families living and working in the downtown tulsa area and surrounding areas. the cdc provides full…

—
6
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
7
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
8
Tulsa Classroom Teachers Association Inc

To strengthen the institutions in which we work, to improve the quality of the services we provide, to bring together all members to assist and support one another, and to promote democracy, human rights, and freedom in our association.

—
9
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
10
Washita Valley Community Action Council

To assist individuals and families in our communities through public and private partnerships to improve the quality of their lives by minimizing the effects of poverty, promoting self-sufficiency and advocating for social change.

Human Services
11
The Parent Child Ctr of Tulsa Inc

To prevent child abuse and neglect through education, treatment, and advocacy. the parent child center of tulsa (pcct) has been serving the tulsa community and surrounding areas since 1990. in 2024, pcct served more than 96,000 infants,…

—
12
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Growing Together Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Tulsa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TULSA EDUCARE INC: $52,927,879 · Youth DevelopmentTULSA EDUCARE INCUNION PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $15,764,674 · OtherUNION PUBLIC SCHOOLSTRI COUNTY TECHNOLOGY CENTER: $1,163,671 · OtherTRI COUNTY TECHNOLOGY C…+3 more: $1,198,779 · Other+3 moreSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $8,105,967 · Human ServicesSUNBEAM FAMILY SERV…THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $2,021,728 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHR…CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,709,632 · Human ServicesCROSSTOWN LEARNING …LIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $1,414,123 · Human ServicesLIFT COMMUNITY ACTI…CROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,329,915 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS YOUTH & …+4 more: $967,489 · Human Services+4 moreTULSA COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC: $1,325,000 · Housing & ShelterTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $386,372 · Housing & Shelter
Youth Development$52,927,879Other$18,127,124Human Services$15,548,854Housing & Shelter$1,711,372

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTULSA EDUCARE INC: $52,927,879 over 8y, 41% of budgetSUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC: $8,105,967 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $2,021,728 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetCROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $1,709,632 over 8y, 15% of budgetLIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC: $1,414,123 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetCROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $1,329,915 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC: $1,325,000 over 1y, 82% of budgetTULSA CHILDREN'S COALITION INC: $500,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC: $468,224 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $386,372 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetGROWING TOGETHER INC: $290,746 over 8y, 16% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC: $26,743 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TULSA EDUCARE INC ↗
  • Who funds SUNBEAM FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA ↗
  • Who funds CROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFT COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA COMMUNITY LOAN FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA CHILDREN'S COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds TULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds GROWING TOGETHER INC ↗
  • Who funds LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

George Kaiser Family FoundationOK21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: George Kaiser Family Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Tulsa Area United Way · Oneok Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Potts Family Foundation Inc · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Oklahoma Center for Nonprofits Inc · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Community Action Project of Tulsa County Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 46%
  • Crossroads Youth & Family Services Inc: 78% of income from government
  • United Community Action Program Inc: 62% of income from government
  • Sunbeam Family Services Inc: 52% of income from government
  • Tulsa Educare Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Lift Community Action Agency Inc: 43% of income from government
  • The Center for Housing Solutions Inc: 34% of income from government
  • Growing Together Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Community Action Project of Tulsa County’s filings →

More from the funding graph