Skip to content

· Public charity

Communities United Action Fund

To educate and support diverse communities as to the importance of the democratic process and increase engagement.

$425k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
01FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k9 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $275k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$346k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOMOS VOTANTES$100,000
BLACK PROGRESSIVE ACTION COALITION$100,000
RISE UNITED NETWORK INC$75,000
MAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC$25,000
POWER RISING ACTION FUND$25,000
ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ACTION$20,000
PROJECT 26 PENNSYLVANIA$20,000
BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND$15,000
FUND FOR STATES$15,000
LATINO VICTORY PROJECT$10,000
ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER POLITICAL ALLIANCE$10,000
EMGAGE ACTION INC$10,000
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY25–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 16% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%PROJECT 26 PENNSYLVANIA: $20k → 22%MAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC: $25k → 20%POWER RISING ACTION FUND: $25k → 14%EMGAGE ACTION INC: $10k → 16%SOMOS VOTANTES: $100k → 13%ASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER POLITICAL ALLIANCE: $10k → 22%FUND FOR STATES: $15k → 14%BLACK PROGRESSIVE ACTION COALITION: $100k → 14%ALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ACTION: $20k → 14%RISE UNITED NETWORK INC: $75k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
America Votes

The Organization was established to coordinate and promote progressive issues, policies, initiatives, and referenda, and to pursue electoral reform that expands access to the ballot.

Community Improvement
2
Pa Alliance Action

The PA Alliance Action seeks to advocate at the state level for democracy reform through grassroots activities and support of like-minded organizations on behalf of and in support of all Pennsylvanians, in particular historically…

Civil Rights
3
Asian & Pacific Islander American Vote

It is the mission of APIAVote to encourage and promote civic participation of Asian Pacific Islander Americans in the electoral and public processes at the national, state, and local levels. APIAVote also aims to educate and inform Asian…

Civil Rights
4
Youth Activism Project

The Youth Activism Project teaches teens movement-building skills to make policy impact at all levels of government. We envision a world in which youth activism is the norm, not the exception. We know that even though many young people are…

Youth Development
5
Poder

PODER Inc. is a non-partisan organization that combats voter suppression by engaging Black and Brown New Yorkers around local, state, and federal elections.

Civil Rights
6
Civica Initiatives

Empower people and strengthen democratic institutions

Community Improvement
7
Black Men Vote Civic Action Fund

Voter engagement

Civil Rights
8
Elevated Voices Inc

Voter education around policy

—
9
Black in Action Collective

Black in Action Collective exists to build Black political power to transform systems and radically reimagine what is possible for ourselves, our families, and our communities

Civil Rights
10
Send the Vote Inc

Conduct digital, direct mail and other public communication campaigns to support voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts.

—
11
Action Tn

Action tn is dedicated to helping grassroots groups across tennessee expand and coordinate their civic and political engagement efforts in service of building power around our shared values, with a particular focus on empowering…

—
12
Upstate Action Alliance

Non-PartisanVoter Educ Advocacy

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Alliance for Youth Action; the most unlike its peers is Make the Road Action Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BLACK PROGRESSIVE ACTION COALITION: $100,000 · OtherBLACK PROGRESSIVE ACTION COALITIONRise United Network Inc: $75,000 · OtherRise United Network IncPOWER RISING ACTION FUND: $25,000 · OtherPOWER RISING ACTION FUNDPROJECT 26 PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 · OtherPROJECT 26 PENNSYLVANIABlack Voters Matter Fund Inc: $15,000 · OtherBlack Voters Matter Fund IncLATINO VICTORY PROJECT: $10,000 · OtherASIAN PACIFIC ISLANDER POLITICAL AL LIANCE: $10,000 · OtherEmgage Action Inc: $10,000 · OtherFORWARD ACTION FUND: $100,000 · Civil RightsFORWARD ACTION FUNDMAKE THE ROAD ACTION INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsMAKE THE ROAD ACTION INCALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ACTION: $20,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ACTIONFUND FOR STATES: $15,000 · Public Benefit
Other$265,000Civil Rights$145,000Public Benefit$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLACK PROGRESSIVE ACTION COALITION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFUND FOR STATES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLATINO VICTORY PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sixteen Thirty FundDC23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sixteen Thirty Fund · Open Society Action Fund Inc · America Votes · Future Forward USA Action · NEO Philanthropy Action Fund Inc · Tides Advocacy · Tides Foundation · Women Donors Network Action · Way to Win Action Fund Inc · All Hands on Deck Network Inc · Wellness Advocacy Fund · Our American Future Action

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Communities United Action Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Communities United Action Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Communities United Action Fund?

    Find your warmest path to Communities United Action Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Communities United Action’s filings →

    More from the funding graph