Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Commission for the Las Vegas Centennial

To provide funding to facilitate the education, commemoration, preservation and enhancement of historic resources in las vegas.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$661k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$7.1MEducation$2.2MRecreation & Sports$1.7MCommunity Improvement$980kFood & Nutrition$662kHuman Services$216kPublic Benefit$180kAnimals$150kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $2,141,515 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,198,059 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $56,544 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $1.4M
  • $250k+1 grant · $661k
$150,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYD PRODUCTIONS LLC$660,962
NEON MUSEUM$200,000
PLAZA HOTEL & CASINO$200,000
CITY OF LAS VEGAS$180,000
SLICKTION CULTURE PRODUCTIONS LLC$174,195
HEATHER CAPUTO PRODUCTIONS$168,277
CITY OF LAS VEGAS$150,000
NEVADA PRESERVATION FOUNDATION$140,189
KME ARCHITECTS$135,835
NEON MUSEUM$72,224
MOB MUSEUM DOCUMENTARY$27,750
UNIVERSITY NEVADA LAS VEGAS$21,963
FRIENDS OF NEVADA STATE MUSEUM LAS VEGAS$10,120
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $216k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Economic Opportunity Board of Clark County: $216k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 14% of Commission for the Las Vegas Centennial’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 78% of the giving stays in NV; read by stated purpose it is 89% — more of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Commission for the Las Vegas Centenniallessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 15 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against -17% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
13

Total granted

$12M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
-17%

Still filing today

47%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NEON MUSEUM
    5× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +152%
  • NP
    NEVADA PRESERVATION FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $839k · revenue +39% · 70% of their budget
  • NT
    NEVADA TEST SITE HISTORICAL
    2× · 2021–2022 · $250k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • WS
    WESTSIDE SCHOOL ALUMNI FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $500k
  • FS
    FREMONT STREET EXPERIENCE
    one grant, 2020 · $225k
  • EO
    ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY BOARD OF CLARK COUNTY
    one grant, 2024 · $216k · revenue +354%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeastern Nevada Historical Soci

Northeastern nevada historcial society is dedicated to the preservation of the hertitage, culture, and natural history of northeastern nevada. our ongoing goals are to establish a western art center and nourish the western culture that…

Arts & Culture
2
Nevada Automobile Museum

To provide the public with display of classic, antique, rare and contemporary automobiles.

3
North Central Nevada Historical Society

Public museum dedicated to the collection, preservation, promotion, and exhibition of the history, pre-history, natural history, and cultural heritage of north central nevada.

4
Nevada State Parks Foundation

The nevada state parks foundation is dedicated to enhancing and preserving the natural beauty, cultural heritage and recreational opportunities within the nevada division of state parks. the foundation is committed to supporting the…

Environment
5
Nevada Gold Mines Heritage Fund
Philanthropy
6
Classic Las Vegas Archive

To ensure that the history of las vegas is safely preserved and easily available to educators, historians, students, and the world wide media through the special collections at unlv and the world wide web.

7
Friends of the Nevada State Railroad Museum the Virginia & Truckee Division

FNSRM provides resources and services for the NeVada State RailRoad Museum, including fund raising, advocacy, and volunteer work ranging from visitor service to restoration and operation of the equipment in its collection.

8
Nevada Veterans Memorial Plaza

To honor and preserve the legacy of our fallen brothers and sisters who have given their life in service to our country since nevada became a state in 1864

Arts & Culture
9
Friends of the Nevada Mansion

The organization is formed for the preservation, maintenance, restoration and support of the nevada governors mansion.

Arts & Culture
10
Friends of the Nevada Southern Railway Inc

To educate its members and the public and to provide support to the operations of the nevada state railroad museum in boulder city, nevada.

Arts & Culture
11
The Nevada Discovery Museum

Educating children and adults through interactive hands-on exhibits and educational programming.

12
Nevada Land Trust

To preserve and protect the special places and open spaces of nevada for future generations.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Las Vegas Natural History Museum and the most unlike its peers is Economic Opportunity Board of Clark County. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
5/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CITY OF LAS VEGAS — $4,485,601 · OtherCITY OF LAS VEGASBOYD PRODUCTIONS LLC — $1,981,485 · OtherBOYD PRODUCTIONS LLCHELLDORADO RODEO AND PARADE — $898,499 · OtherHELLDORADO RODEO AND PARADEPLAZA HOTEL & CASINO — $775,963 · OtherPLAZA HOTEL & CASINOWESTSIDE SCHOOL ALUMNI FOUNDATION — $500,000 · OtherSlicktion Culture Productions — $448,245 · Other+12 more — $1,307,298 · Other+12 moreTHE NEON MUSEUM — $1,138,501 · Arts & CultureTHE NEON MUSEUM300 STEWART AVENUE CORPORATION — $350,769 · Arts & Culture300 STEWART AVEN…NEVADA TEST SITE HISTORICAL — $250,001 · Arts & CultureNEVADA TEST SITE…SOUTHERN NEVADA PUBLIC TELEVISION — $100,000 · Arts & CultureDISCOVERY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $88,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $29,814 · Arts & CultureNEVADA PRESERVATION FOUNDATION — $839,451 · EnvironmentSPRINGS PRESERVE FOUNDATION — $41,740 · EnvironmentECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY BOARD OF CLARK COUNTY — $215,667 · Human ServicesJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LAS VEGAS — $64,762 · Community Improvement
Other$10,397,091Arts & Culture$1,957,585Environment$881,191Human Services$215,667Community Improvement$64,762

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE NEON MUSEUM — $1,138,501 over 5y, 12% of budgetNEVADA PRESERVATION FOUNDATION — $839,451 over 9y, 70% of budget300 STEWART AVENUE CORPORATION — $350,769 over 6y, 7.9% of budgetNEVADA TEST SITE HISTORICAL — $250,001 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetSOUTHERN NEVADA PUBLIC TELEVISION — $100,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetDISCOVERY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $88,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF LAS VEGAS — $64,762 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetSPRINGS PRESERVE FOUNDATION — $41,740 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetLAS VEGAS NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM — $19,694 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF NEVADA STATE MUSEUM LAS VEGAS — $10,120 over 1y, 18% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NEON MUSEUM
  • Who funds NEVADA PRESERVATION FOUNDATION
  • Who funds 300 STEWART AVENUE CORPORATION
  • Who funds NEVADA TEST SITE HISTORICAL
  • Who funds ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY BOARD OF CLARK COUNTY
  • Who funds SOUTHERN NEVADA PUBLIC TELEVISION
  • Who funds DISCOVERY CHILDREN'S MUSEUM
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF LAS VEGAS
  • Who funds SPRINGS PRESERVE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LAS VEGAS NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NEVADA STATE MUSEUM LAS VEGAS

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Nevada Humanities IncNV19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Nevada Humanities Inc · United Way of Southern Nevada · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Commission for the Las Vegas Centennial funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph