Skip to content

· Private foundation

Columbus Female Benevolent Society

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$38k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$192kFood & Nutrition$66kHealth$13kYouth Development$2kEducation$1kArts & Culture$250
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$600
Median grant
1
States reached
$27k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
34 INDIGENT DIRECT RELIEF RECIPIENTS$23,389
NNEMAP INC$3,700
BROAD ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FOOD PANTRY$3,500
BROAD ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,350
NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$1,869
Individual grant recipient$719
GAHANNA RESIDENTS IN NEED GRIN$600
MID-OHIO WORKERS ASSOCIATION$500
BISHOP GRIFFIN RESOURCE CENTER$500
Individual grant recipient$285
NATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL COMMUNITY WELLNESS$271
Individual grant recipient$183
IMPACT - JUST IN TIME CLOSET$150
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%FURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO: $1k → 15%FURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO: $640 → 15%FURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO: $640 → 15%FURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO: $320 → 15%NNEMAP INC: $7k → 15%NNEMAP INC: $4k → 15%NNEMAP INC: $3k → 15%NNEMAP INC: $3k → 15%NNEMAP INC: $2k → 15%NNEMAP INC: $2k → 15%NNEMAP INC: $1k → 15%NNEMAP INC: $500 → 15%GAHANNA RESIDENTS IN NEED GRIN: $1k → 15%GAHANNA RESIDENTS IN NEED GRIN: $600 → 15%GAHANNA RESIDENTS IN NEED: $300 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$267k · 15 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +145% since the first grant, against +6% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$267k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+145%
+6%

Still filing today

27%
10%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $683 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionHealthReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NI
    NNEMAP INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $23k · revenue +145%
  • FB
    FURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO
    4× · 2017–2020 · $3k · revenue +31%
  • GR
    GAHANNA RESIDENTS IN NEED
    3× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +378%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • NC
    NATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL TEEN AND PREGNANT CLINIC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • SM
    ST MARK'S ESPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
2
Healthsource of Ohio Inc

Healthsource of ohio is a nonprofit community health center that provides quality, patient-centered health care to underserved patients in southwest ohio.

—
3
National Church Residences At Home Hospice

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—
4
Coalition of Care Greater Cincinnati

Coalition of Care exists to mobilize churches and to inspire volunteers to care for vulnerable children and fragile families

Youth Development
5
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stages of life.

Human Services
6
Lifecare Hospice

The mission of hospice is to provide medical care, nursing care, pain relief, and emotional and spiritual support services to terminally ill patients and their families.

—
7
National Church Residences At Home Inc

Originating from a christian commitment of service, our mission is to provide high quality care, services and residential communities for all seniors.

—
8
A Healthier Ohio Now Inc

Educate about issues related to Medicaid

—
9
Hospice of Central Ohio

Our mission is to provide compassionate end-of-life care through physical, emotional, and spiritual care support.

—
10
Life Resources of Northern Michigan Inc

Provide crisis pregnancy services

Human Services
11
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
12
Goshen Hospital & Health Care
Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nnemap Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lifecare Alliance. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

34 INDIGENT DIRECT RELIEF RECIPIENTS: $166,590 · Other34 INDIGENT DIRECT RELIEF RECIPIENTSBROAD ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $28,402 · OtherBROAD ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHBROAD ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FOOD PANTRY: $14,600 · OtherBROAD ST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FOOD PANTRYNATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $10,091 · Other+17 more: $25,477 · Other+17 moreNNEMAP INC: $22,604 · Human ServicesNNEMAP INCFURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO: $2,630 · Human ServicesFURNITURE B…GAHANNA RESIDENTS IN NEED: $1,900 · Human ServicesGAHANNA RES…COMPASS INC: $1,350 · HealthBISHOP GRIFFIN RESOURCE CENTER SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $500 · ReligionLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$245,160Human Services$27,134Health$1,350Religion$500Food & Nutrition$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNNEMAP INC: $22,604 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO: $2,630 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGAHANNA RESIDENTS IN NEED: $1,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPASS INC: $1,350 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBISHOP GRIFFIN RESOURCE CENTER SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFECARE ALLIANCE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NNEMAP INC ↗
  • Who funds FURNITURE BANK OF CENTRAL OHIO ↗
  • Who funds GAHANNA RESIDENTS IN NEED ↗
  • Who funds COMPASS INC ↗
  • Who funds BISHOP GRIFFIN RESOURCE CENTER SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL ↗
  • Who funds LIFECARE ALLIANCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Columbus Female Benevolent Society funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Columbus Female Benevolent Society. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Columbus Female Benevolent Society?

    Find your warmest path to Columbus Female Benevolent Society through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Columbus Female Benevolent Society’s filings →

    More from the funding graph