Skip to content

· Private foundation

Columbia Term Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$102kPublic Safety & Disaster$30kFood & Nutrition$28kInternational$9kHuman Services$5kReligion$4kAnimals$2kEducation$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$406k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KIRKWOOD HISTORICAL SOCIETY$8,000
VENICE THEATRE$3,000
KIRK CARE INC$3,000
ALL HANDS VOLUNTEERS$3,000
WINGS OF HOPE INC$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ALL HANDS VOLUNTEERS: $6k → 8%VENICE THEATRE: $3k → 9%OPEN DOOR ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $1k → 9%CITY OF KIRKWOOD: $8k → 11%SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $50 → 21%NORTHERN WYOMING COMMUNITY: $400 → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA: $1k → 19%DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $1k → 10%ALL HANDS VOLUNTEERS: $6k → 8%VENICE THEATRE: $3k → 9%OPEN DOOR ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $1k → 9%CITY OF KIRKWOOD: $8k → 11%SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $50 → 21%NORTHERN WYOMING COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $400 → 10%CATHOLIC CHARITIES USA: $1k → 19%DISABLED AMERICAN VETERANS: $1k → 10%ALL HANDS VOLUNTEERS: $3k → 8%KIRK CARE INC: $8k → 11%ALL HANDS VOLUNTEERS: $3k → 8%CITY OF KIRKWOOD: $8k → 11%ALL HANDS VOLUNTEERS: $3k → 8%KIRK CARE INC: $5k → 11%ALL HANDS VOLUNTEERS: $3k → 8%KIRK CARE INC: $4k → 11%ALL HANDS VOLUNTEERS: $3k → 8%CITY OF KIRKWOOD: $4k → 11%ALL HANDS VOLUNTEERS: $2k → 8%CITY OF KIRKWOOD: $3k → 11%ALL HANDS VOLUNTEERS: $1k → 8%KIRK CARE INC: $3k → 11%KIRK CARE INC: $3k → 11%KIRK CARE INC: $3k → 11%CITY OF KIRKWOOD: $2k → 11%CITY OF KIRKWOOD: $1k → 11%CITY OF KIRKWOOD: $1k → 11%KIRKWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $1k → 11%KIRK CARE INC: $1k → 11%KIRK CARE INC: $500 → 11%FISHER HOUSE: $500 → 11%KIRKWOOD BAPTIST CHURCH: $500 → 11%FISHER HOUSE: $500 → 11%WINGS OF HOPE INC: $4k → 11%WINGS OF HOPE INC: $2k → 11%WINGS OF HOPE INC: $2k → 11%WINGS OF HOPE INC: $1k → 11%SALVATION ARMY: $1k → 11%SALVATION ARMY: $1k → 11%NERNIX HALL: $50 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$183k · 14 repeat orgs$800 to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$183k
$800

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterHealthEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KH
    KIRKWOOD HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    7× · 2019–2025 · $65k · revenue +175% · 34% of their budget
  • ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +129%
  • KC
    KIRK CARE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $28k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • NW
    NORTHERN WYOMING COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $400
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $400
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The 11TH Hour Animal Rescue Inc T/a Eleventh Hour Animal Rescue

Is a volunteer-based non profit organization that saves dogs and cats from death (high kill shelters) and adopts them to loving families.

Animals
2
Kitty City Kansas Rescue Incorporated

Find homes for homeless cats through adoptions

Animals
3
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
4
K9 Hurricane's Heroes Inc

K9 hurricane's heroes, a federally recognized, non-profit organization, provides "retired law enforcement and military dogs" with subsidized veterinary care so they can live a long and healthy life. often these incredible dogs are the…

Animals
5
National Voluntary Organizations Active in Disaster Inc

National voluntary organizations active in disaster (voad) leads the voad movement, as a convener, thought leader, and advocate for a diverse group of organizations dedicated to serving communities throughout the disaster cycle.

—
6
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
7
Chain of Hope Kc

Outreach to help animals suffering in the urban core of kansas city.

Animals
8
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
9
Homeward Animal Shelter Inc

To care for, protect and place animals for adoption in life long homes, and to prevent cruelty to animals by educating our community in the proper and humane care of all animals.

Animals
10
Humane Society of Southwest Missouri

The humane society of southwest missouri is one of the largest open admission, no kill shelters in southwest missouri. it is dedicated to helping sick, injured and abandoned dogs and cats find their forever homes. for over 60 years the…

Animals
11
Mary Ryder Home

To serve st. louis' most vulnerable senior women, nourishing their social, physical and emotional needs, and enhancing their quality of life through compassionate care.

Housing & Shelter
12
Washington Humane Society

The washington humane society protects animals, supports families, and advocates for positive change to create a world where all animals can thrive. we enrich the humanity of our communities by promoting compassion and encouraging people…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is All Hands and Hearts Smart Response Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kirkwood Historical Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KIRKWOOD HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $65,000 · Arts & CultureKIRKWOOD HISTORICAL SOCIETYVENICE THEATRE INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureVENICE THEATRE INCIndividual grant recipient: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDisabled American Veterans: $2,000 · OtherOPEN DOOR ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $2,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES USA: $2,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY: $2,000 · Other+5 more: $3,400 · Other+5 moreALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $30,000 · Public Safety & DisasterALL HANDS AND HEAR…KIRK CARE INC: $27,500 · HealthKIRK CARE INCWINGS OF HOPE: $9,000 · InternationalST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $100 · Education
Arts & Culture$71,000Other$46,400Public Safety & Disaster$30,000Health$27,500International$9,000Education$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKIRKWOOD HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $65,000 over 7y, 34% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC: $30,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetKIRK CARE INC: $27,500 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetWINGS OF HOPE: $9,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVENICE THEATRE INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDisabled American Veterans: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR ANIMAL SANCTUARY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST LOUIS UNIVERSITY: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KIRKWOOD HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC ↗
  • Who funds KIRK CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds VENICE THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds Disabled American Veterans ↗
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds ST LOUIS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Columbia Term Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Columbia Term Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Venice Theatre Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Columbia Term’s filings →

More from the funding graph