Skip to content

· Public charity

Collins Community Credit Union

Our mission is to devote ourselves to financial success for all.

$82k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$55kCommunity Improvement$55kEducation$30kHealth$30kPhilanthropy$25kInternational$19kMembership Benefit$10kCivil Rights$5k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $18,550, the rows itemized in this filing. The $81,581 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $63,031 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$12,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.6B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NORTH LIBERTY COMMUNITY BETTERMENT GROUP$12,500
MARION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY$6,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $48k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK: $12k → 15%WOMEN LEAD CHANGE: $10k → 9%COMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK: $12k → 15%WOMEN LEAD CHANGE: $8k → 9%WOMEN LEAD CHANGE: $7k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$175k · 7 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

$175k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+56%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationInternationalPhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2021 · $30k · revenue +3%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1D
    4× · 2020–2023 · $30k · revenue +42%
  • I
    IWLC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $24k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • IC
    IOWA CITY DOWNTOWN SELF SUPPORTED MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $11k · revenue +56%
  • IC
    IOWA CREDIT UNION LEAGUE
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -33%
  • TP
    TANAGER PLACE
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +21%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Iowa Credit Union Foundation

Founded in 1995 as the philanthropic arm of the iowa credit union league and guided by the credit union philosophy of "people helping people", the iowa credit union foundation (the foundation) works to champion financial well-being for…

Unclassified
2
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
3
Iowa City Area Chamber of Commerce

Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.

—
4
Independent Insurance Agents of Iowa

The independent insurance agents of iowa will be an unrelenting advocate of the business, professional and political interests of its members; doing so by working in the public's interest and with the highest ethical standards.

—
5
Common Good Iowa

Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.

—
6
American Civil Liberties Union of Iowa

The union works to advocate and advance a public policy agenda to support and protect the constitution of the united states and the constitution of the state of iowa. it works to maintain throughout the united states the rights of free…

—
7
Iowa Business Council

The mission of the iowa business council is to engage the personal commitment of its executive members in active leadership roles on major initiatives that offer opportuinities to enhance iowa's overall economic vitality.

—
8
Madison County Development Group

To attract businesses to locate in madison county, iowa

—
9
Iowa Association of Business and Industry Foundation

To deliver programs and to conduct research for the benefit of students, educators, emerging leaders and employers that expand their knowledge and enhance their individual responsibility and leadership skills.

Youth Development
10
Iowa College Foundation

The foundation is organized to further the growth and development of private colleges and universities of higher education in iowa.

—
11
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
12
Iowa Corn Promotion Board

The iowa corn promotion board (icpb) works to develop and defend markets, fund research, and provide education about corn and corn products. icpb's mission is to create opportunities for long term iowa corn grower profitability.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of East Central Iowa; the most unlike its peers is North Liberty Community Betterment Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY: $31,250 · OtherMARION ECONOMIC DEVELOPME…IOWA CITY DOWNTOWN SELF SUPPORTED MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT: $10,772 · OtherIOWA CITY DOWNTOWN SELF S…IOWA CREDIT UNION LEAGUE: $10,000 · OtherIOWA CREDIT UNION LEAGUEIWLC: $24,000 · Human ServicesIWLCCOMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK: $24,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY CRISIS SERVIC…BREAKTHROUGH T1D: $30,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DTANAGER PLACE: $7,485 · HealthTANAGER PLACEJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationJUNIOR ACHIEVE…UNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA: $16,875 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY O…GREATER CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER CEDA…WORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS INC: $19,167 · InternationalWORLDWIDE…NORTH LIBERTY COMMUNITY BETTERMENT GROUP: $12,500 · Community ImprovementONE IOWA: $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$52,022Human Services$48,000Health$37,485Education$30,000Philanthropy$24,875International$19,167Community Improvement$12,500Civil Rights$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARION ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMPANY: $31,250 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF EASTERN IOWA FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIWLC: $24,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY CRISIS SERVICES AND FOOD BANK: $24,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWORLDWIDE FOUNDATION FOR CREDIT UNIONS INC: $19,167 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL IOWA: $16,875 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH LIBERTY COMMUNITY BETTERMENT GROUP: $12,500 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetIOWA CITY DOWNTOWN SELF SUPPORTED MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT: $10,772 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetIOWA CREDIT UNION LEAGUE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGREATER CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTANAGER PLACE: $7,485 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetONE IOWA: $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

GreenState Credit UnionIA19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: GreenState Credit Union · Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Collins Community Credit Union funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Collins Community Credit Union. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Collins Community Credit Union’s filings →

    More from the funding graph