Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cole Birches Fdn-Dima-Winslow

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$138k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of COLE BIRCHES FDN-DIMA-WINSLOW’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $53k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY$50,000
CHRIST CHURCH BRONXVILLE$20,000
NATIONAL INSTITUTE REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH$15,000
MIRIAM'S KITCHEN$6,000
COURAGEOUS KIDZ INC$5,000
PRESIDENT & FELLOWS MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE$5,000
BRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC$5,000
MARET SCHOOL$5,000
CENTRAL QUEENS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL$5,000
NATIONAL TAY SACHS & ALLIED DISEASE ASSN$5,000
RAZOM$3,000
HOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION$3,000
LUCKY DOG ANIMAL RESCUE$2,000
ADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB$2,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $6k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $6k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $6k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $6k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $6k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $6k → 14%MIRIAM'S KITCHEN: $6k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
MA
OR
OH
VA
MD
SC
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$548k · 24 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.

24 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
13

Total granted

$548k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+29%

Still filing today

83%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthCivil RightsInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MK
    MIRIAM'S KITCHEN
    7× · 2019–2025 · $42k · revenue +148%
  • BB
    BRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +121%
  • PA
    President and Fellows of Middlebury College
    7× · 2019–2025 · $25k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • KS
    KYIV SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS
    one grant, 2022 · $12k · revenue +10%
  • CC
    CHRIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • AS
    ALABAMA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVALgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Capitol Hill Day School

Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

3
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
4
The Seed Public Charter School of Washington Dc

The seed public charter school of washington, dc is a public college-preparatory boarding school whose primary mission is to provide an outstanding intensive educational program that prepares children, both academically and socially, for…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

6
Bullis School

Bullis school provides a student-centered balanced experience in academics, arts, athletics and community service. bullis uniquely prepares all students to become caring citizens and creative, critical thinkers who will thrive in…

Education
7
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
8
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
9
Darrow School

Darrow school is dedicated to serving students with diverse backgrounds and abilities, building on each student's talents and interests to inspire enduring confidence for success in college and life. this mission is accomplished through…

Education
10
The York School

York school is an award-winning, private, coed college-prep school for grades 8-12, that develops confident and authentic leaders. we offer an academically challenging experiential program for bright, kind, and driven students in an…

Education
11
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
12
Caroline D Bradley Association of Scholars

Cdbas mission is to support the institute for educational advancement(iea,) which is dedicated to the intellectual, creative, and personalgrowth of our nation's gifted and high-potential youth. central to themission of iea is a commitment…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Institute for Reproductive Health Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bright Beginnings Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyGovernment Accountability R…Pregnancy Support ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Wildlife Rehabilitation Cen…Ymca Community CentersChristian Youth CampsAnimal Rescue and AdoptionCommunity Arts Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%40%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%43%35–55yr16%29%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,534

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/30
Grantees still filing
23/30
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $165,500 · OtherCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCHBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC — $35,000 · OtherBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INCHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC — $29,000 · OtherHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INCREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $12,000 · OtherADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB INC — $14,000 · OtherSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC — $15,000 · Other+13 more — $59,500 · Other+13 morePresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $25,000 · EducationPresident and Fello…CENTRAL QUEENS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL — $20,000 · EducationCENTRAL QUEENS ACAD…MARET SCHOOL INC — $17,500 · EducationMARET SCHOOL INCCity Wildlife Inc — $14,000 · EducationCity Wildlife IncKYIV SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS — $11,500 · EducationKYIV SCHOOL OF ECON…The Potomac School — $10,000 · EducationThe Potomac SchoolTHE LANGLEY SCHOOL INC — $8,000 · EducationTHE LANGLEY SCHOOL …The Madeira School — $6,000 · Education+1 more — $2,500 · EducationHOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION — $21,000 · HealthHOPE FOR H…Courageous Kidz Inc — $20,000 · HealthCourageous…NATIONAL TAY-SACHS & ALLIED DISEASES ASS — $20,000 · HealthNATIONAL T…+1 more — $1,000 · HealthNATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY — $50,000 · Public BenefitMIRIAM'S KITCHEN — $42,000 · Human ServicesWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $16,000 · InternationalRAZOM INC — $12,000 · InternationalNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC — $15,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $6,030 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $5,000 · Civil Rights
Other$350,000Education$114,500Health$62,000Public Benefit$50,000Human Services$42,000International$28,000Civil Rights$26,030

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMIRIAM'S KITCHEN — $42,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC — $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC — $29,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College — $25,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION — $21,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCENTRAL QUEENS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCourageous Kidz Inc — $20,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetNATIONAL TAY-SACHS & ALLIED DISEASES ASS — $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMARET SCHOOL INC — $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $16,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB INC — $14,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCity Wildlife Inc — $14,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetRAZOM INC — $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKYIV SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS — $11,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Potomac School — $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP DUDLEY INC — $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LANGLEY SCHOOL INC — $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetALABAMA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL — $8,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $6,030 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Madeira School — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRIMARY DAY SCHOOL INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBIA LAW REVIEW ASSOCIATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCAMP DUDLEY FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY
  • Who funds MIRIAM'S KITCHEN
  • Who funds BRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC
  • Who funds HIGHER ACHIEVEMENT PROGRAM INC
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Middlebury College
  • Who funds HOPE FOR HENRY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CENTRAL QUEENS ACADEMY CHARTER SCHOOL
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Courageous Kidz Inc
  • Who funds NATIONAL TAY-SACHS & ALLIED DISEASES ASS
  • Who funds MARET SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH INC
  • Who funds SPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC
  • Who funds ADIRONDACK MOUNTAIN CLUB INC
  • Who funds City Wildlife Inc
  • Who funds RAZOM INC
  • Who funds KYIV SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS
  • Who funds The Potomac School
  • Who funds CAMP DUDLEY INC
  • Who funds THE LANGLEY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds ALABAMA SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds The Madeira School
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS INC
  • Who funds THE PRIMARY DAY SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds CAMP DUDLEY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT17.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cole Birches Fdn-Dima-Winslow funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph