Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Coile Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Housing & Shelter$36kArts & Culture$34kAnimals$18kHuman Services$17kPhilanthropy$10kFood & Nutrition$9kEducation$5kHealth$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$253k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$5,000
ANNAPOLIS MARITIME MUSEUM$5,000
THE FAMILY PANTRY-DAMIENS PLACE$5,000
HOPE HOSPICE$5,000
COMMUNITY HOUSING & RESOURCES$5,000
BIG ARTS$5,000
FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC$5,000
SCCF$5,000
CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITAITON OF WILDLIFE$5,000
AACC FOUNDATION INC$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE FAMILY PANTRY-DAMIENS PLACE: $5k → 8%THE FAMILY PANTRY-DAMIENS PLACE: $1k → 8%THE FAMILY PANTRY-DAMIENS PLACE: $1k → 8%THE FAMILY PANTRY-DAMIENS PLACE: $1k → 8%THE FAMILY PANTRY-DAMIENS PLACE: $500 → 8%FISH OF SANIBEL INC: $5k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL INC: $5k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC: $5k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL INC: $1k → 11%FISH OF SANIBEL INC: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$132k · 8 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +70% since the first grant, against -25% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$132k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
-25%

Still filing today

63%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterAnimalsEducationHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Community Housing and Resources Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $36k · revenue +50%
  • AM
    ANNAPOLIS MARITIME MUSEUM INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $25k · revenue +86%
  • CF
    CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $18k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • NC
    NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coastal Hospice

Coastal hospice promotes dignity and quality of life for patients and families who face life-limiting conditions.

Human Services
2
St Anne's Nursing Center St Anne's Residence Inc

The organization provides nursing and assisted care to individuals of all faiths regardless of ability to pay.

Health
3
Central Maine Medical Center

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment and compassion of ourfamily of caregivers.

Health
4
Hospice of the Treasure Coast Inc

Hospice of the treasure coast, inc. exists to provide hospice, grief counseling, education and other services to patients and families dealing with death and dying so that they might live as fully and comfortably as possible.

5
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
6
Hospice of Martin & St Lucie Inc

Hospice of martin & st. lucie, inc. exists to provide hospice, grief counseling, education and other services to patients and families, dealing with death and dying so that they might live as fully and comfortably as possible. hospice…

Human Services
7
Community Hospice of Northeast Florida

To improve the quality of life for patients and families and be the compassionate guide for end-of-life care in our community.

Human Services
8
Manatee Rescue & Rehabilitation Partnership Inc

To inspire and advance manatee conservation by partnering cooperatively in manatee rescue, rehabilitation, release, and monitoring efforts; improve understanding of manatee biology and health through scientific research; and promote…

Animals
9
Nassau Suffolk Hospital Council Foundation Inc

Nassau suffolk hospital council foundation provides investment income and maintains restricted asset funds.

10
Sanibel Sea School Inc

Improve the ocean's future, one person at a time, in order to live in a world where all people value, understand, and care for the ocean.

11
Sanibel-Captiva Conservation Foundation

To protect and care for southwest florida's coastal ecosystems.

Environment
12
Florida Community Health Centers Inc

Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Clinic for the Rehabilitation of Wildlife Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ANNAPOLIS MARITIME MUSEUM INC — $25,000 · OtherANNAPOLIS MARITIME MUSEUM INCBIG ARTS — $9,000 · OtherBIG ARTSSCCF — $9,000 · OtherSCCFIndividual grant recipient — $9,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCommunity Housing and Resources Inc — $36,000 · Housing & ShelterCommunity Housing and Resour…FISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC — $17,000 · Human ServicesFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPT…THE FAMILY PANTRY- DAMIEN'S PLACE — $8,500 · Human ServicesTHE FAMILY PANTRY- D…CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC — $18,000 · AnimalsCLINIC FOR THE…ANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · EducationHOPE HOSPICE INC — $5,000 · HealthNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC — $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$52,000Housing & Shelter$36,000Human Services$25,500Animals$18,000Education$5,000Health$5,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCommunity Housing and Resources Inc — $36,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetANNAPOLIS MARITIME MUSEUM INC — $25,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC — $18,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetFISH OF SANIBEL-CAPTIVA INC — $17,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FAMILY PANTRY- DAMIEN'S PLACE — $8,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetANNE ARUNDEL COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE HOSPICE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR FAMILY PHILANTHROPY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Coile Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 36%
  • The Family Pantry- Damien's Place36% of income from government
  • Annapolis Maritime Museum Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph