Skip to content
Cocchiaro Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Cocchiaro Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$392kYouth Development$88kHealth$64kHuman Services$59kEducation$44kEnvironment$42kHousing & Shelter$39kArts & Culture$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$830k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY TRINITY PARISH$15,450
COMMUNITY CHURCH OF SANDWICH$14,800
HARMONY WOMEN'S CARE CENTER$10,000
SQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION$2,000
FOREST SOCIETY$2,000
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$2,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE MUSIC FESTIVAL$1,000
WALKWITHTIGER$1,000
SPEARE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL$925
HAVEN PREGNANCY SERVICES$500
ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE NEW ENGLAND$500
INTERLAKES COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS INC$100
INTERLAKES ATHLETIC BOOSTER CLUB$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $77k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HELP & HOPE CENTER: $500 → 3%INTERLAKES COMMUNITY CAREGIVERS INC: $100 → 9%BELKNAP HOUSE: $3k → 9%BELKNAP HOUSE: $3k → 9%BELKNAP HOUSE: $2k → 9%BELKNAP HOUSE: $2k → 9%BELKNAP HOUSE: $500 → 9%ISAIAH 61 CAFE: $500 → 9%ISAIAH 61 CAFE: $200 → 9%HOPE CHILDRENS HOME: $15k → 13%HOPE CHILDRENS HOME: $10k → 13%HOPE CHILDRENS HOME: $10k → 13%HOPE CHILDRENS HOME: $10k → 13%HOPE CHILDRENS HOME: $6k → 13%HOPE CHILDRENS HOME: $1k → 13%PLYMOUTH AREA COMMUNITY CLOSET: $2k → 10%THE BRIDGE HOUSE: $2k → 10%THE BRIDGE HOUSE: $2k → 10%PLYMOUTH AREA COMMUNITY CLOSET: $1k → 10%PLYMOUTH AREA COMMUNITY CLOSET: $1k → 10%THE BRIDGE HOUSE: $1k → 10%PLYMOUTH AREA COMMUNITY CLOSET: $1k → 10%PLYMOUTH AREA COMMUNITY CLOSET: $1k → 10%THE BRIDGE HOUSE: $1k → 10%CADY: $500 → 10%CADY: $500 → 10%CADY: $500 → 10%CADY: $500 → 10%THE BRIDGE HOUSE: $300 → 10%THE BRIDGE HOUSE: $250 → 10%THE BRIDGE HOUSE: $250 → 10%THE BRIDGE HOUSE: $250 → 10%CADY: $200 → 10%CADY: $200 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
MI
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
MD
DE
NC
DC
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$740k · 48 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 39 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
23

Total granted

$740k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+4%

Still filing today

60%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HI
    Hope International Ministries Inc
    6× · 2017–2022 · $52k · revenue +52%
  • TE
    Tom Ewing Ministries Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $44k · revenue +100%
  • CP
    CIRCLE PROGRAM
    8× · 2017–2024 · $35k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • C
    CARENET-RI
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Piscataquog Land Conservancy

The Piscataquog Land Conservancy is a nonprofit land conservation organization founded in 1970. Its purpose is to conserve the natural and scenic environment of the Piscataquog, Souhegan and Nashua River watershed communities of southern…

—
2
Saint Anselm College

Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…

Education
3
Shaker Bridge Theatre Inc

To foster and support the performing arts in the upper valley and lakes region of new hampshire

Arts & Culture
4
Hampshire Country School

Hampshire country school is a place of possibilities for high-ability, neurodiverse students enrolling in later elementary or middle school who have not found success in traditional educational environments. hampshire country school offers…

—
5
Clean Energy Nh

To strengthen new hampshire's economy and conserve natural resources by promoting a transition to clean, efficient, and renewable energy.

Environment
6
Putney School Inc

The organization is committed to developing each student's full intellectual, artistic and physical potential. students are encouraged to challenge themselves intellectually, to pursue rigorous learning for its own sake, (see schedule…

—
7
Concord Christian Academy

Concord Christian Academy is a life preparatory educational institution that works in harmony with families to promote the spiritual, intellectual, emotional, physical and creative growth of students, empowering them to live for the glory…

Education
8
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
9
Maine Media College

Maine Media Workshops & College educates and inspires visual artists and storytellers to achieve their creative potential. We provide lifelong learning opportunities for those pursuing the fine arts and media-related professions. We are…

—
10
North Country Center for the Arts Inc

A premier center for the arts in the white mountain area of new hampshire

Arts & Culture
11
New England Frontier Camp Corp

Christian training for youth

Recreation & Sports
12
Peacham Library Inc

Provides Public Library and information services to the Peacham community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spaulding Academy & Family Services; the most unlike its peers is Young Ladies Library Association of Plymouth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/39
Grantees still filing
28/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIVING WATERS MINISTRIES: $190,334 · OtherLIVING WATERS MINISTRIESHOLY TRINITY PARISH: $101,035 · OtherHOLY TRINITY PARISHCOMMUNITY CHURCH OF SANDWICH: $50,475 · OtherCOMMUNITY CHURCH OF SANDWICHTom Ewing Ministries Inc: $43,612 · OtherTom Ewing Ministries IncHARMONY WOMEN'S CARE CENTER: $36,000 · OtherHARMONY WOMEN'S CARE CENTERCIRCLE PROGRAM: $35,000 · OtherCIRCLE PROGRAMMAYHEW: $26,500 · OtherST FRANCIS INN MINISTRIES: $21,400 · Other+40 more: $69,195 · Other+40 moreHope International Ministries Inc: $52,000 · Human ServicesHope Intern…Belknap House: $9,500 · Human ServicesBelknap Hou…The Bridge House Inc: $6,050 · Human ServicesThe Bridge …PLYMOUTH AREA COMMUNITY CLOSET: $6,000 · Human ServicesPLYMOUTH AR…+5 more: $4,100 · Human ServicesSQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER: $22,100 · EnvironmentSQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $10,000 · EnvironmentSQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION: $2,800 · Environment+1 more: $550 · EnvironmentSPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES: $22,450 · HealthSpeare Memorial Hospital: $11,494 · Health+1 more: $500 · HealthPEMI-BAKER LITERACY: $25,300 · EducationGBARNGA LUTHERAN MISSION PRJCT INC: $1,330 · Education+3 more: $600 · EducationDELAWARE THEATRE COMPANY: $7,350 · Arts & CultureARTREACH INC: $4,350 · Arts & CultureNEW HAMPSHIRE MUSIC FESTIVAL: $3,000 · Arts & CultureBOSTON MUSIC PROJECT INC: $900 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureBETSYS PARK: $6,000 · Recreation & SportsFIRST DESCENTS: $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$573,551Human Services$77,650Environment$35,450Health$34,444Education$27,230Arts & Culture$16,100Recreation & Sports$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHope International Ministries Inc: $52,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTom Ewing Ministries Inc: $43,612 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetCIRCLE PROGRAM: $35,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetMAYHEW: $26,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetPEMI-BAKER LITERACY: $25,300 over 8y, 7.7% of budgetSPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES: $22,450 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER: $22,100 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSpeare Memorial Hospital: $11,494 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY: $10,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetBelknap House: $9,500 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetDELAWARE THEATRE COMPANY: $7,350 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Bridge House Inc: $6,050 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBETSYS PARK: $6,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetPLYMOUTH AREA COMMUNITY CLOSET: $6,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE LOST CHILDREN OF PERU INC: $5,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetARTREACH INC: $4,350 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE MUSIC FESTIVAL: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION: $2,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCADY INC: $2,400 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNew Hampshire Charitable Foundation: $1,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGBARNGA LUTHERAN MISSION PRJCT INC: $1,330 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR CHRISTIAN RENEWAL: $1,100 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBOSTON MUSIC PROJECT INC: $900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEMI YOUTH CENTER INC: $750 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetIsaiah 61 Cafe: $700 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNEW HAMPSHIRE LAKES ASSOCIATION INC: $550 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTAGEWORKS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE NEW ENGLAND AND NEW JERSEY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIRST DESCENTS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRINITY CAFE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASTLE ROCK COMMUNITY INTER CHURCH TASK FORCE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORE NYC INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS AQUINAS COLLEGE: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMONTREAT COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGORDON COLLEGE: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInterlakes Community Caregivers Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Hope International Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds Tom Ewing Ministries Inc ↗
  • Who funds CIRCLE PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds MAYHEW ↗
  • Who funds PEMI-BAKER LITERACY ↗
  • Who funds SPAULDING ACADEMY & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SQUAM LAKES NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Speare Memorial Hospital ↗
  • Who funds SQUAM LAKES CONSERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Belknap House ↗
  • Who funds DELAWARE THEATRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds The Bridge House Inc ↗
  • Who funds BETSYS PARK ↗
  • Who funds PLYMOUTH AREA COMMUNITY CLOSET ↗
  • Who funds THE LOST CHILDREN OF PERU INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF NEW HAMPSHIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE MUSIC FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds SQUAM LAKES ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CADY INC ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Charitable Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GBARNGA LUTHERAN MISSION PRJCT INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR CHRISTIAN RENEWAL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charita…Lovett-Woodsum Founda…Tosa FoundationGreater Lakes Region …Madelaine G Vonweber …Cogswell Benevolent T…Boston Foundation IncBank of New Hampshire…Hillman Family Founda…Mathieson Family Foun…The Pamela and Lauren…The Schifrin Foundati…
New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH39.4× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Lovett-Woodsum Foundation Inc · Tosa Foundation · Greater Lakes Region Charitable Fund for Children Inc · Madelaine G Vonweber Trust Todd Fahey & William Tucker Co-Trustees · Cogswell Benevolent Trust · Boston Foundation Inc · Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Mathieson Family Foundation · The Pamela and Laurence Tarica Foundation · The Schifrin Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cocchiaro Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cocchiaro Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Boston Music Project Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Delaware Theatre Company: 8% of income from government
  • Gordon College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cocchiaro Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home