· Public charity
Champions for Literacy
Use the power of sports to raise awareness about the cause of literacy, generate funds for local literacy programs, and create volunteer activities for athletes to promote the power of reading to students pre-school through third grade.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 13 grants below total $252,689 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $306,706 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $54,017 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED WAY OF PICKENS COUNTY CAMP IROCK | $48,091 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS | $25,142 |
| MEMPHIS TEACHER RESIDENCY | $23,829 |
| KNOWLEDGE QUEST | $23,077 |
| READERS 2 LEADERS | $20,000 |
| THE 2ND & 7 FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| SMART READING | $18,675 |
| HEART OF MISSOURI UNITED WAY | $15,852 |
| INDIAN PRAIRIE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| LITERACY MID-SOUTH | $11,543 |
| BELIEVE MEMPHIS ACADEMY | $11,480 |
| MEMPHIS ATHLETIC MINISTRIES | $10,000 |
| EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF THE BIG BEND | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $130k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +2% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $33k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UWUNITED WAY OF PICKENS COUNTY5× · 2021–2025 · $220k · revenue +90%
- UWUNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC5× · 2021–2025 · $151k · revenue +8%
- MTMEMPHIS TEACHER RESIDENCY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $133k · revenue +4%
Funded once
- FFFOUNDATION FOR ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $22k · revenue +125%
- LTLOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $16k · revenue +27%
- BEBook Emone grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue -25%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Read to a child's mission is to foster a love of reading, improve literacy skills and support socio-emotional well-being in students from under-resourced communities.
Reading results partners with schools to support students from systemically excluded communities in becoming successful readers. we believe that literacy is a basic human right, and we work to increase access and break down barriers…
Ready readers expands literacy for young children in low- incomecommunities through high-quality books, strong relationships, andliteracy-related experiences.
To advance state policies and practices that ensure all tennessee children from birth through 3rd grade get the high quality early education they need to power our state's future.
Create a coordinated and integrated system for school readiness services to better prepare children for entry into kindergarten, with an emphasis on literacy skills for children who may be at risk for future school failure.
To maximize childrens potential through increased school readiness.
The organization is a community volunteer-based program designed to provide struggling readers and their families with access to trained tutors who donate time on a regular basis. the focus of these volunteer tutors is children who need to…
Year-round, one-to-one tutoring program provided at Title 1 schools to students not at grade-level proficiency in reading. Tutors are area teens recruited and trained to deliver reading support.
Read alliance, inc (read alliance) works to accelerate the educational trajectory of early elementary students through the power of teens who provide one-to-one literacy tutoring in under-resourced communities. read impacts two populations…
Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…
The mission is to support children in learning to read early and well, speciically reading on grade-level by the completion of third grade.
Provide an inclusive and diverse learning environment that prepares preschool children and their families for success through high quality curriculum, nurturing educators, parental engagement, and community collaboration
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Reading Partners and the most unlike its peers is Starkville Oktibbeha Consolidated School District Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF PICKENS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE PLAINS INC ↗
- Who funds MEMPHIS TEACHER RESIDENCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE 2ND AND 7 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds READERS 2 LEADERS ↗
- Who funds KNOWLEDGE QUEST INC ↗
- Who funds Making It Better dba Literacy Now ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA FAMILY CONNECTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds HEART OF MISSOURI UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds SMART READING ↗
- Who funds ESCAMBIA COUNTY SCHOOL READINESS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds EARLY LEARNING COALITION OF THE BIG BEND REGION INC ↗
- Who funds STREETS MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN PRAIRIE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TUSCALOOSA CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHWEST LOUISIANA ↗
- Who funds CARE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM READERS INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICE PROGRAMS OF WEST ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Book Em ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF WEST CENTRAL MISSISSIPPI INC ↗
- Who funds BIG BUDDY PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds THE LEAP FROG PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY MID-SOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds RAISING READERS IN STORY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds READY FOR SCHOOL READY FOR LIFE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Dollar General Literacy Foundation · International Paper Company Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Kemmons Wilson Family Foundation · AT&T Foundation · Lumen Clarke M Williams Foundation · Slingshot Memphis Inc · Thomas W Briggs Foundation Inc · United Way of the Mid South · Community Foundation of Greater Memphis Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Champions for Literacy funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Care Elementary School Inc — 8% of income from government
- Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Champions for Literacy?
Find your warmest path to Champions for Literacy through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.