Skip to content

· Private foundation

Co Tuw Anne J Caudal-Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$18k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$214kFood & Nutrition$146kCommunity Improvement$66kHousing & Shelter$65kEducation$57kHealth$50kArts & Culture$44k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $54k
$13,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF$18,000
APPLIED BEHAVIORAL REHAB INST HOMES$13,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INT'L INC$13,000
FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICE$10,000
CITYMEALS-ON WHEELS$8,000
COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WOMEN RISING INC: $5k → 14%WOMEN RISING INC: $5k → 14%WOMEN RISING INC: $5k → 14%WOMEN RISING INC: $5k → 14%WOMEN RISING INC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$623k · 11 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
1

Total granted

$623k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+30%

Still filing today

64%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionEducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • C
    CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $68k · revenue +38%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $57k · revenue +52%
  • WR
    WOMEN RISING INC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $25k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • WATERFIRE PROVIDENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +30%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
NextOp Inc

NextOp helps place talented enlisted service members and veterans into civilian careers through highly individualized preparation and an array of programming.

Public Benefit
2
Goodwill Industries of Greater New York & Northern New Jersey Inc

Goodwill nynj empowers people with disabilities and other barriers to employment to gain independence through the power of work. goodwill nynj provided services to more than 11,087 adults in fiscal year 2025 through all programs.

Employment
3
Operation Homefront Inc

Build strong, stable, and secure military families so they can thrive - not simply struggle to get by - in the communities they've worked so hard to protect.

Community Improvement
4
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
5
University City District

University city district is a partnership of world-renowned anchor institutions, small businesses and residents that creates opportunity, improves economic vitality and quality of life in the university city area of west philadelphia. our…

Community Improvement
6
Usaging

Usaging represents & supports the national network of area agencies on aging & advocates for the title vi native american aging programs that help older adults & people with disabilities live with optimal health, well-being, independence &…

—
7
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
8
The Fedcap Group Inc

We are committed to improving the lives of people with barriers to economic well-being.

Employment
9
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
10
Housing Partnership Development Corporation

Housing partnership development corporation functions to provide available low and moderate cost housing in the new york metro area through new housing production, preservation, rehabilitation, as well as the revitalization and…

Housing & Shelter
11
Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation

Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…

Housing & Shelter
12
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Military Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Vets Chat Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF: $132,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES OFVETS CHAT INC: $78,128 · OtherVETS CHAT INCCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONS: $66,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY SOLUTIONSPATERSON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC SUBSIDIARY: $65,000 · OtherPATERSON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC SUBSIDIARYMORRISTOWN MEMORIAL HEALTH FDN: $36,711 · OtherMORRISTOWN MEMORIAL HEALTH FDNMT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICES: $36,500 · OtherMT CARMEL VETERANS SERVICESFEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $20,000 · Other+2 more: $18,000 · OtherCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $67,500 · Food & NutritionCITYMEALS-O…UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $57,356 · EducationUNIVERSITY…MILITARY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $38,700 · Arts & CultureWOMEN RISING INC: $25,000 · Human Services
Other$452,339Food & Nutrition$67,500Education$57,356Arts & Culture$38,700Human Services$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVETS CHAT INC: $78,128 over 6y, 46% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS: $67,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPATERSON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC SUBSIDIARY: $65,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC: $57,356 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMILITARY HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $38,700 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetWOMEN RISING INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetFEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWATERFIRE PROVIDENCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VETS CHAT INC ↗
  • Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds PATERSON HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC SUBSIDIARY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILITARY HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN RISING INC ↗
  • Who funds FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERFIRE PROVIDENCE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Co Tuw Anne J Caudal-Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Co Tuw Anne J Caudal-Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 65%
  • Women Rising Inc: 65% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Co Tuw Anne J Caudal-Charitable’s filings →

More from the funding graph