Skip to content

· Private foundation

Co-Ttee Uw of C Alice R Bean

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$114kReligion$94kFood & Nutrition$54kYouth Development$49kHuman Services$25kRecreation & Sports$20k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HUMANE SOCIETY OF LOWELL$20,000
CHALLENGE UNLIMITED AT IRONSTONE FARM$5,000
GREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA$5,000
OPEN PANTRY OF GREATER LOWELL$5,000
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER LOWELL$5,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LOWELL$5,000
MERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%GREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA: $5k → 8%GREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$335k · 10 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$335k
$15k

Still filing today

60%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentAnimalsFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LH
    LOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY
    7× · 2017–2025 · $114k · revenue +102%
  • MERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +51%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER LOWELL
    7× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +70%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHRIST CHURCH UNITED IN LOWELL
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
6/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST CHURCH UNITED IN: $79,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH UNITED INCHALLENGE UNLIMITED AT IRONSTONE: $19,500 · OtherCHALLENGE UNLIMITED AT IRONSTONEGREATER LOWELL FAMILY: $17,000 · OtherGREATER LOWELL FAMILYOPEN PANTRY OF GREATER: $17,000 · OtherOPEN PANTRY OF GREATERCHRIST CHURCH UNITED IN LOWELL: $15,000 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH UNITED IN LOWELLThe Open Pantry of Greater Lowell Inc: $7,500 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherLOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY: $114,000 · AnimalsLOWELL HUMANE SOCIETYGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER LOWELL: $24,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORA…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LOWELL INC: $24,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CL…MERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $24,500 · Food & NutritionGREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA: $7,500 · Human Services
Other$160,000Animals$114,000Youth Development$49,000Food & Nutrition$24,500Human Services$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY: $114,000 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetMERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $24,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER LOWELL: $24,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LOWELL INC: $24,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe Open Pantry of Greater Lowell Inc: $7,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetGREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOWELL HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds MERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER LOWELL ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER LOWELL INC ↗
  • Who funds The Open Pantry of Greater Lowell Inc ↗
  • Who funds GREATER LOWELL FAMILY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGE UNLIMITED INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Theodore Edson Parker FoundationMA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Theodore Edson Parker Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Greater Lowell Health Alliance Chna 10 Inc · Richard K & Nancy L Donahue Charitable Foundation · Greater Lowell Community Foundation Inc · Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Co-Ttee Uw of C Alice R Bean funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Co-Ttee Uw of C Alice R Bean. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Boys & Girls Club of Greater Lowell Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Merrimack Valley Food Bank Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Girls Incorporated of Greater Lowell: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Co-Ttee Uw of C Alice R Bean?

Find your warmest path to Co-Ttee Uw of C Alice R Bean through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Co-Ttee Uw of C Alice R Bean’s filings →

More from the funding graph