Skip to content
Clyde & Anita Becker Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Clyde & Anita Becker Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$102k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

64% of Clyde & Anita Becker Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Community Foundation For Monterey County, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 16 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year Clyde & Anita Becker Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 20 organizations, $102k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

14
’17
16
’18
17
’19
6
’20
19
’21
17
’22
19
’23
20
’24
16
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$1.0MEducation$698kHealth$178kHuman Services$144kFood & Nutrition$136kRecreation & Sports$71kYouth Development$62kHousing & Shelter$42kOther$0
02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k25 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$10,000
MARLAND CHILDREN'S HOME$10,000
UCLA UNICAMP$5,000
CLAREHOUSE$5,000
FOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY$5,000
THE MISSION$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO$5,000
TULSA DAY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS$5,000
PONCA CITY UNITED WAY$5,000
IRON GATE$5,000
THE LITTLE LIGHTHOUSE$5,000
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA$5,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$5,000
YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA$5,000
SANTA CLARA UNIVERSITY$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $125k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GATHERING FOR WOMEN: $1k → 12%GATHERING FOR WOMEN: $1k → 12%MARLAND CHILDREN'S HOME: $10k → 14%MARLAND CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 14%MARLAND CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 14%MARLAND CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 14%MARLAND CHILDREN'S HOME: $5k → 14%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%OPPORTUNITY CENTER FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%CLAREHOUSE: $10k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $5k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $10k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $5k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $5k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 32 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

32 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
8

Total granted

$1.4M
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+2%

Still filing today

69%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementReligionHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    UNIVERSITY CAMPS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +34%
  • YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +2%
  • IRON GATE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +136%

Funded once

  • MR
    MOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +2%
  • CS
    California State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue -24%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Regional Food Bank of Oklahoma Inc

The mission of the regional food bank of oklahoma is to lead a network that provides nutritious food and pathways to self-sufficiency for people facing hunger. our vision is an oklahoma where no one goes hungry.

Food & Nutrition
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
City Rescue Mission Inc

Our mission is to lead our community by serving people experiencing or at risk of homelessness with help, hope, and healing, in the spirit of excellence, under the call of christ.

Human Services
4
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
5
The City Lights Foundation of Oklahoma

Our mission is rooted in the belief that meaningful relationships restore communities. through relational service and dignified housing solutions, we work to help people move from surviving to thriving.

Human Services
6
Central California Food Bank

Ccfb is dedicated to ending hunger, working with over 200 partner agencies to provide food to those experiencing hunger. our mission: transforming lives together, in the passionate pursuit to end hunger in central ca - one meal, one…

Food & Nutrition
7
Oklahoma City University

Inspired by a culture of creativity, Oklahoma City University fosters an immersive, personalized experience that welcomes and prepares students to pursue boundless opportunities.

Education
8
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
9
United Way of Central Oklahoma Inc

United way of central oklahoma is committed to connecting people and resources to improve the well being of those in our community.

Philanthropy
10
Sunnyvale Community Services

The mission of sunnyvale community services is to prevent homelessness and hunger for low-income sunnyvale residents facing temporary crises.

Human Services
11
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
12
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Oklahoma Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Mission. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $1,000,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTYUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $540,049 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOU…+3 more: $37,500 · Education+3 moreFOUNDATION FOR OSU MEDICAL CENTER: $177,633 · OtherFOUNDATION FOR OSU MEDICAL C…UNIVERSITY CAMPS: $55,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY CAMPSPONCA CITY UNITED WAY: $45,000 · OtherPONCA CITY UNITED WAYLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $40,000 · OtherLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INCThe Mission: $33,000 · OtherThe MissionUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES: $32,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS…UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA REGENTS: $30,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $30,000 · Other+23 more: $159,500 · Other+23 moreYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesClarehouse Inc: $40,000 · Human ServicesMARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC: $30,000 · Human ServicesOpportunity Center Foundation Inc: $8,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesIRON GATE INC: $45,000 · ReligionTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $8,000 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$1,000,000Education$577,549Other$602,633Human Services$125,000Religion$45,000Housing & Shelter$40,000Food & Nutrition$38,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $540,049 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY CAMPS: $55,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC: $45,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetIRON GATE INC: $45,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetClarehouse Inc: $40,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetThe Mission: $33,000 over 7y, 9.0% of budgetMARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC: $30,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $30,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Olympics Oklahoma Inc: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC: $9,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetOpportunity Center Foundation Inc: $8,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHEROKEE AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $7,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCalifornia State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGATHERING FOR WOMEN - MONTEREY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR MONTEREY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY CAMPS ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC ↗
  • Who funds IRON GATE INC ↗
  • Who funds Clarehouse Inc ↗
  • Who funds TULSA DAY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Mission ↗
  • Who funds MARLAND CHILDRENS HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR MONTEREY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
  • Who funds Special Olympics Oklahoma Inc ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds PRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds A NEW LEAF INC ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds Opportunity Center Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Meals on Wheels of Metro Tulsa Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHEROKEE AREA COUNCIL OF BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds California State University Fresno Alumni Association Incorporated ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jess L and Miriam B S…Mervin Bovaird Founda…The Gelvin FoundationSarkeys FoundationThe Anne and Henry Za…Tulsa Community Found…Stuart Family Foundat…Morningcrest Healthca…Grace & Franklin Bern…Ralph and Frances McG…Maxine and Jack Zarro…The Sharna and Irvin …
Jess L and Miriam B Stevens FoundationOK20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jess L and Miriam B Stevens Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · Stuart Family Foundation · Morningcrest Healthcare Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clyde & Anita Becker Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clyde & Anita Becker Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 8%
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc: 8% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Clyde & Anita Becker’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home