Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cloverlane Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$137k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What you fund
0189% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$183kHealth$91kPublic Benefit$78kPublic Safety & Disaster$26kFood & Nutrition$18kCommunity Improvement$13kAnimals$13kRecreation & Sports$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $22k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $90k
$250
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLAN HANCOCK FOUNDATION$90,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
US POWER SOCCER ASSN$8,687
BAND OF BROTHERS$8,500
VETERANS PAYING IT FORWARD$2,500
FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY$1,000
A PAWSABILITY 4 VETS$500
SAN MARCOS HIGH SCHOOL$250
SANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION$200
CARE 4 PAWS$100
SANTA BARBARA WILDLIFE CARE$100
OJAI RAPTURE CENTER$100
Individual grant recipient$100
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$100
AMERICAN LEGION$65
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CLOTHES CLOSET: $1k → 17%BOYS TOWN: $102 → 12%NEXT STEP SERVICE DOGS: $40k → 11%CLOTHES CLOSET: $1k → 17%NEXT STEP SERVICE DOGS: $21k → 11%NEXT STEP SERVICE DOGS: $10k → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%NEXT STEP SERVICE DOGS: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
IN
CA
CO
NE
VA
AZ
TN
DC
AL
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$296k · 36 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +53% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

36 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 26 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
43

Total granted

$296k
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
0%

Still filing today

28%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 9% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesAnimalsPublic BenefitEnvironmentHealthReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VF
    Viva Francis Foundation
    7× · 2017–2023 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PANTRY
    3× · 2019–2023 · $3k · revenue +53%
  • TC
    THE CLOTHES CLOSET INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue ×41

Funded once

  • BS
    BUELLTON SENIOR CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $13k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $11k
  • WH
    Welcome Home Vets
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue -77%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
2
San Diego Humane Society and Spca

Create a more humane world by inspiring compassion, providing hope and advancing the welfare of animals and people.

Animals
3
Hope Ranch Animal Sanctuary

Animal rescue

Animals
4
Sandbar Sanctuary

Sandbar sanctuary provides equine therapy for victims of domestic violence, using horses who have themselves been rescued from abusive or neglectful situations. our goal is to help our clients increase their confidence and learn to set…

Health
5
California Coastal Horse Rescue

To help end neglect and abuse to horses

Animals
6
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
7
California Paws Rescue

California paws rescue provides a safe, secure, and loving place for abandoned pets to recuperate, socialize, and get the medical care they need to recover and be ready to join a new home and family.

Animals
8
Friends of Humane Services in Tijuana

Friends of Humane Services in Tijuana was founded in August of 2007. Our mission is to support organizations and individuals who work to improve the conditions in the US and Mexican communities that border the Tijuana, Mexico area, by…

Animals
9
Crossing Guardians

Crossing Guardians is a nonprofit animal rescue and charitable organization. The purpose of our organization is to save and improve the lives of abused, neglected, and homeless animals suffering and struggling to survive along the…

Animals
10
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals of Northern Nv

Our mission is to be an innovative regional leader in responsible treatment of homeless dogs and cats, primarily through their rescue and placement in forever loving homes and by promoting spaying and neutering to control pet…

Unclassified
11
Animal Help Now (formerly Animal Watch)

Animal Help Now creates innovative apps that empower the public to assist animals in our communities who are in crisis or otherwise imperiled. The organization also educates the public about keeping animals in our communities safe from…

Animals
12
Heart Healthcare and Emergency Animal Rescue Team

To save the lives of pets and people by helping to protect both from zoonotic and other diseases, creating public awareness on animal welfare matters, providing vital education, and acting as a resource for assistance in animal related…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches and the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALLAN HANCOCK FOUNDATION — $90,000 · OtherALLAN HANCOCK FOUNDATIONVETERANSPAYINGITFORWARD — $75,231 · OtherVETERANSPAYINGITFORWARDVETERANS MOBILITY PROJECT — $41,254 · OtherVETERANS MOBILITY PROJECTIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBAND OF BROTHERS — $21,740 · OtherBAND OF BROTHERSIndividual grant recipient — $13,900 · OtherSANTA BARBARA FOODBANK — $13,570 · OtherBUELLTON SENIOR CENTER — $13,360 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $12,662 · Other+62 more — $68,312 · Other+62 moreNEXT STEP SERVICE DOGS — $71,100 · Human ServicesNEXT STEP SERVICE …COMMUNITY PANTRY — $2,550 · Human Services+3 more — $2,202 · Human ServicesViva Francis Foundation — $4,750 · ReligionALL FROM THE HEART INC — $2,500 · Public BenefitHonor Flight Central Coast California — $2,000 · Public BenefitWelcome Home Vets — $2,640 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $100 · HealthWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $626 · EnvironmentOjai Raptor Center — $400 · EnvironmentFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc — $1,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$375,029Human Services$75,852Religion$4,750Public Benefit$4,500Health$2,740Environment$1,026Food & Nutrition$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEXT STEP SERVICE DOGS — $71,100 over 4y, 10% of budgetViva Francis Foundation — $4,750 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetWelcome Home Vets — $2,640 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY PANTRY — $2,550 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALL FROM THE HEART INC — $2,500 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetTHE CLOTHES CLOSET INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHonor Flight Central Coast California — $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFoodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION — $951 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $626 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCARE4Paws Inc — $600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe American Legion — $546 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOjai Raptor Center — $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH COUNTY RAPE CRISIS AND CHILD PROTECTION CENTER INC — $300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMT San Jacinto Community College Foundation — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $110 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home — $102 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHORSEPOWER SANCTUARIES INC DBA REDWINGS HORSE SANCTUARY — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEXT STEP SERVICE DOGS
  • Who funds Viva Francis Foundation
  • Who funds Welcome Home Vets
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PANTRY
  • Who funds ALL FROM THE HEART INC
  • Who funds THE CLOTHES CLOSET INC
  • Who funds Honor Flight Central Coast California
  • Who funds Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc
  • Who funds FAMILIES ACT
  • Who funds SANTA BARBARA RESCUE MISSION
  • Who funds WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC
  • Who funds CARE4Paws Inc
  • Who funds The American Legion

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Network for GoodDC6.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cloverlane Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cloverlane Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cloverlane Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph