Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cloud L Cray Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$300k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$865kEducation$723kHuman Services$315kArts & Culture$211kSocial Science$145kFood & Nutrition$86kHealth$69kCommunity Improvement$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $180k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT$75,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER KC$35,000
SPARKWHEEL$30,000
KANSAS COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION$30,000
SIFMA FOUNDATION$25,000
ATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION$25,000
VALLEY HOPE OF ATCHISON$15,000
YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY$10,000
YOUTH VOLUNTEER CORPS$10,000
THEATRE ATCHISON$6,500
Individual grant recipient$6,000
ATCHISON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$5,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
ATCHISON CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION$5,000
HOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $80k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YMCA OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $10k → 5%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 15%YOUTH VOLUNTEER CORPS: $10k → 15%YOUTH VOLUNTEER CORPS: $10k → 15%YOUTH VOLUNTEER CORPS: $10k → 15%YOUTH VOLUNTEER CORPS: $10k → 15%YOUTH VOLUNTEER CORPS: $10k → 15%YOUTH VOLUNTEER CORPS: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 33 repeat orgs$161k to everyone else

33 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
15

Total granted

$2.5M
$146k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+82%

Still filing today

48%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesSocial ScienceYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    SPARKWHEEL INC
    6× · 2017–2025 · $210k · revenue +55%
  • KC
    KANSAS COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $145k · revenue +25%
  • SF
    SIFMA FOUNDATION FOR INVESTOR EDUCATION (FIE) INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $145k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • YE
    Youth Entrepreneurs Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue +82%
  • AA
    ATCHISON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -5%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Atchison Community Health Clinic Inc

Atchison community health clinic exists to promote wellness by providing quality healthcare to all.

Health
2
Live Well Live Atchison Inc

To identify our community's greatest needs and then initiate sustainable programs and interventions to improve the health outcomes, quality of life, and economic vitality for the atchison kansas community.

Health
3
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
4
Bike Share Kc

Bike share kc provides the greater kansas city area with a bike share system designed for transportation, recreation, and exercise.

Human Services
5
Kansas Cooperative Council

The kansas cooperative council exists to promote, support and advance the interests, business success, and understanding of agricultural, utility, credit and consumer cooperatives and their members through legislation and regulatory…

—
6
Kansas Action for Children Inc

Kansas action for children, inc. is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to shaping health, education and economic policy that improves the lives of kansas children and their families.

Human Services
7
Kansas Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies

Out vision is: all communities across kansas value and support a high-quality early childhood care and education system.

Environment
8
Kansas City Christian School Association

To bring glory to god by providing children with an excellent christ- centered education rooted in the word of god.

—
9
Atchison Area Economic Development Corporation Inc

To maintain real estate for the economic development of atchison county, kansas. to provide resources and assistance for continued economic development in atchison county, kansas.

Education
10
Kansas Children's Discovery Center Inc

The kansas children's discovery center enhances the lives of children and enriches the communities it serves.

Arts & Culture
11
Western Kansas Community Foundation

Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.

Philanthropy
12
Kansas Business Hall of Fame Inc
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys Club of Greater Kansas City; the most unlike its peers is The Humane Society of Atchison Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $530,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENTUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-KANSAS CITY: $185,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-KANSAS CITYBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER KC: $145,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER KCATCHISON FAMILY YMCA: $135,000 · OtherATCHISON FAMILY YMCACOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MID AMER: $65,000 · OtherKANSAS COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUC: $60,000 · Other+32 more: $668,100 · Other+32 moreKANSAS COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $145,347 · Social ScienceKANSAS COUNC…SIFMA FOUNDATION FOR INVESTOR EDUCATION (FIE) INC: $145,000 · Social ScienceSIFMA FOUNDA…SPARKWHEEL INC: $210,000 · EducationSPARKWHEEL …Youth Entrepreneurs Inc: $35,000 · EducationYouth Entre…ATCHISON CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $27,000 · EducationATCHISON CH…+1 more: $5,000 · EducationBOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $115,000 · Youth DevelopmentYouth Volunteer Corps: $75,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $10,000 · Human ServicesSUPPORTING KIDS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Arts & CultureHOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC: $57,000 · Health
Other$1,788,100Social Science$290,347Education$277,000Youth Development$115,000Human Services$100,000Arts & Culture$80,000Health$57,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPARKWHEEL INC: $210,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetKANSAS COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION: $145,347 over 6y, 12% of budgetSIFMA FOUNDATION FOR INVESTOR EDUCATION (FIE) INC: $145,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $115,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION: $80,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetYouth Volunteer Corps: $75,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetHOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC: $57,000 over 6y, 6.7% of budgetTHEATRE ATCHISON INC: $52,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetHARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetATCHISON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $41,500 over 6y, 36% of budgetGreater Kansas City Community Foundation: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Entrepreneurs Inc: $35,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEL CENTRO INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetATCHISON CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION: $27,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetATCHISON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: $25,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetAtchison Art Association: $21,500 over 5y, 5.2% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON INC: $20,600 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetGIVING THE BASICS INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUPPORTING KIDS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMINDDRIVE INCORPORATED: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWildwood Outdoor Education Center: $3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPARKWHEEL INC ↗
  • Who funds KANSAS COUNCIL ON ECONOMIC EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds SIFMA FOUNDATION FOR INVESTOR EDUCATION (FIE) INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS CLUB OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
  • Who funds ATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Youth Volunteer Corps ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC ↗
  • Who funds THEATRE ATCHISON INC ↗
  • Who funds HARVESTERS - THE COMMUNITY FOOD NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds ATCHISON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Greater Kansas City Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Youth Entrepreneurs Inc ↗
  • Who funds EL CENTRO INC ↗
  • Who funds ATCHISON CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ATCHISON AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
  • Who funds Atchison Art Association ↗
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON INC ↗
  • Who funds GIVING THE BASICS INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Courtney S Turner Charitable TrustTX24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Courtney S Turner Charitable Trust · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The Cloud L Cray and Sara J Cray Family Foundation · Evah C Cray Residuary Charitable Trust Sawmill Trust Company Trustee · Adair-Exchange Bank Foundation · Guy I Bromley Residuary Trust · Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Laidacker M & Karen L Seaberg Seaberg Family Foundation · Pratt Family Charitable Foundation · Muchnic Foundation · William T Kemper Foundation Commerce Bank Trustee

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cloud L Cray Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cloud L Cray Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cloud L Cray’s filings →

    More from the funding graph