Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Evah C Cray Residuary Charitable Trust Sawmill Trust Company Trustee

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$423k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What you fund
0169% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$1.7MHealth$162kEducation$96kAnimals$84kHuman Services$58kPhilanthropy$50kYouth Development$31kCivil Rights$16kHousing & Shelter$15kOther$1.0M
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k17 grants · $286k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$8.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EVAH C CRAY HISTORICAL HOME MUSEUM$120,000
HOPE FAMILY THERAPY$45,000
ATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FESTIVAL$25,000
ATCHISON AREA UNITED WAY$25,000
AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION$20,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ATCHISON$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON$15,000
PHOENIX PERFORMING ARTS BOOSTER CLUB$15,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$15,000
THE ATCHISON CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION$15,000
FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASA ASSOCIATION$11,000
PROJECT CONCERN$10,000
ATCHISON COUNTY FOOD PANTRY$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $58k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PROJECT CONCERN: $10k → 15%PROJECT CONCERN: $10k → 15%PROJECT CONCERN: $10k → 15%PROJECT CONCERN: $10k → 15%PROJECT CONCERN: $5k → 15%PROJECT CONCERN: $5k → 15%PROJECT CONCERN: $5k → 15%PROJECT CONCERN: $3k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 23 repeat orgs$364k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
10

Total granted

$2.9M
$295k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+112%

Still filing today

52%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EVAH C CRAY HISTORICAL HOME MUSEUM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +43% · 96% of their budget
  • TA
    THEATRE ATCHISON INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $180k · revenue +185%
  • HF
    HOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC
    5× · 2021–2025 · $150k · revenue +101%

Funded once

  • AA
    ATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $130k · revenue +112%
  • U4
    USD 409
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • AF
    ATCHISON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -76%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Atchison Area Economic Development Corporation Inc

To maintain real estate for the economic development of atchison county, kansas. to provide resources and assistance for continued economic development in atchison county, kansas.

Education
2
Atchison Community Health Clinic Inc

Atchison community health clinic exists to promote wellness by providing quality healthcare to all.

Health
3
Kittson County Historical Society

Dedicated to the discovery, preservation, and dissemination of knowledge which will esstablish and illustrate the history of kittson county.

4
Atchison Area Chamber of Commerce

To focus on the quality of life, attraction, growth, and retention of jobs and businesses in atchison county.

5
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
6
Atchison County Memorial Building Foundation

Preserve and maintain memorial building

Arts & Culture
7
Atkinson Youth Services

To provide quality homes for children who need family care. To provide independent living skills program for children emancipating out of foster care.

Human Services
8
Atchison Community Educational Foundation

Provide funds for the education of at-risk students in the atchison, kansas area

Philanthropy
9
Atchison County Multi Purpose Ctr

Provide nutrious meals to the aged

10
Allerton Housing Association Inc

To provide low rent housing in Allerton, Iowa.

11
Project Atchison Inc

The purpose of project atchison, inc. is to promote a more enjoyable and promising atchison for today and future generations. leading by example we strive to bring about communitywide change through hard work, advocacy, commitment, and…

Community Improvement
12
Barton County Historical Society

Historical museum and library. preservation of historical information and materials relating to barton county kansas.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Theatre Atchison Inc and the most unlike its peers is Evah C Cray Historical Home Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

EVAH C CRAY HISTORICAL HOME MUSEUM INC — $1,596,627 · Arts & CultureEVAH C CRAY HISTORICAL HOME MUSEUM INCATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION — $130,000 · Arts & CultureATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATIONTHEATRE ATCHISON INC — $180,000 · OtherTHEATRE ATCHISON INCIndividual grant recipient — $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientATCHISON FAMILY YMCA — $97,500 · OtherATCHISON FAMILY YMCAATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FESTIVAL — $75,000 · OtherATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FESTIVALFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $72,500 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient — $65,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION — $60,000 · OtherAMELIA EARHART FOUNDATIONUSD 409 — $50,000 · OtherHAPPY HEARTS INC — $46,000 · Other+22 more — $301,492 · Other+22 moreHOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC — $150,000 · HealthLIVE WELL LIVE ATCHISON INC — $11,500 · HealthATCHISON CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION — $95,500 · EducationTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON INC — $84,100 · AnimalsPROJECT CONCERN INC — $57,500 · Human ServicesATCHISON FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Philanthropy
Arts & Culture$1,726,627Other$1,067,492Health$161,500Education$95,500Animals$84,100Human Services$57,500Philanthropy$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEVAH C CRAY HISTORICAL HOME MUSEUM INC — $1,596,627 over 9y, 96% of budgetTHEATRE ATCHISON INC — $180,000 over 9y, 4.4% of budgetHOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC — $150,000 over 5y, 8.9% of budgetATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION — $130,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetATCHISON CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION — $95,500 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON INC — $84,100 over 9y, 10% of budgetPROJECT CONCERN INC — $57,500 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetHAPPY HEARTS INC — $46,000 over 5y, 56% of budgetATCHISON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $34,992 over 7y, 11% of budgetBITTERSWEET HOMESTEAD INC — $33,000 over 6y, 3.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ATCHISON INC — $31,000 over 3y, 18% of budgetFirst Judicial District CASA Association — $16,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetTHE FULLER CENTER — $15,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetLIVE WELL LIVE ATCHISON INC — $11,500 over 2y, 2.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EVAH C CRAY HISTORICAL HOME MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds THEATRE ATCHISON INC
  • Who funds HOPE FAMILY THERAPY INC
  • Who funds ATCHISON AMELIA EARHART FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ATCHISON CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF ATCHISON INC
  • Who funds PROJECT CONCERN INC
  • Who funds ATCHISON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HAPPY HEARTS INC
  • Who funds ATCHISON COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds BITTERSWEET HOMESTEAD INC
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ATCHISON INC
  • Who funds First Judicial District CASA Association
  • Who funds THE FULLER CENTER
  • Who funds LIVE WELL LIVE ATCHISON INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Courtney S Turner Charitable TrustTX32.7× affinity13 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Courtney S Turner Charitable Trust · The Cloud L Cray and Sara J Cray Family Foundation · Cloud L Cray Foundation · Adair-Exchange Bank Foundation · Guy I Bromley Residuary Trust · Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · Atchison United Way Board · Pratt Family Charitable Foundation · Laidacker M & Karen L Seaberg Seaberg Family Foundation · Muchnic Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Evah C Cray Residuary Charitable Trust Sawmill Trust Company Trustee funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Evah C Cray Residuary Charitable Trust Sawmill Trust Company Trustee?

    Find your warmest path to Evah C Cray Residuary Charitable Trust Sawmill Trust Company Trustee through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph