Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Clinton G Mills Tui

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$30k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$276kCommunity Improvement$2k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$649k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AT LOWELL$6,000
EMMANUEL COLLEGE$3,000
ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY$3,000
SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY$3,000
PROVIDENCE COLLEGE$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA$3,000
NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY$3,000
SIMMONS UNIVERSITY$3,000
BOSTON COLLEGE$3,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%BOSTON COLLEGE: $4k → 7%BRIDGEWATER STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY: $4k → 8%FITCHBURG STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%UMASS AMHERST: $7k → 12%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY: $4k → 11%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $4k → 8%SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 14%THE COLLEGE OF ST ROSE: $4k → 14%BAYLOR UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TAMPA: $3k → 13%PROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $6k → 14%RIVIER UNIVERSITY: $4k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND: $4k → 9%UNIVERSITY OF MAINE FARMINGTON: $6k → 14%BOSTON COLLEGE: $4k → 7%UMASS LOWELL: $6k → 8%ENDICOTT COLLEGE: $4k → 10%UMASS AMHERST: $5k → 12%NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $4k → 14%PROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $4k → 14%BOSTON COLLEGE: $3k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AT LOWELL: $6k → 8%ASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY: $3k → 11%UMASS AMHERST: $4k → 12%SIMMONS UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%PROVIDENCE COLLEGE: $3k → 14%BOSTON COLLEGE: $3k → 7%UMASS LOWELL: $4k → 8%UMASS AMHERST: $4k → 12%EMMANUEL COLLEGE: $3k → 16%UMASS AMHERST: $4k → 12%CURRY COLLEGE: $4k → 7%SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $7k → 10%SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 10%TUFTS UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 10%SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS - BOSTON: $11k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS - BOSTON: $4k → 16%BENTLEY UNIVERSITY: $6k → 8%UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS - BOSTON: $4k → 16%BENTLEY UNIVERSITY: $3k → 8%SUFFOLK UNIVERSITY: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
NH
NY
MA
PA
NJ
RI
CA
MO
VA
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$186k · 17 repeat orgs$85k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
28

Total granted

$186k
$76k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+18%

Still filing today

59%
68%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PROVIDENCE COLLEGE
    4× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +48%
  • TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE
    5× · 2019–2025 · $15k · revenue +53%
  • BENTLEY UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2018–2023 · $14k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MAINE FARMINGTON
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • TC
    THE COLLEGE OF ST ROSE
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • RU
    Rivier Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +56%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
4
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
5
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
6
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
7
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
10
Marquette University

As a Catholic, Jesuit university our mission is to search for truth, discover shareknowledge, foster personal professional excellence, promote a life of faith and developleadership expressed in service to others. See Schedule O.

Education
11
Lewis & Clark College

Lewis & clark is a premier private higher education institution offering an exceptional education in an inclusive environment. by fostering critical thinking, innovation, creativity, civic engagement, and leadership, both inside and…

Education
12
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University and the most unlike its peers is Rivier University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 84 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr19%12%20–35yr14%12%35–55yr14%73%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr19%13%20–35yr14%16%35–55yr14%70%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/35
the rest of the field
11%
4,714/42,323

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
34/34
Grantees still filing
28/34
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROVIDENCE COLLEGE — $15,500 · EducationPROVIDENCE COLLEGETRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $15,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGEBENTLEY UNIVERSITY — $13,500 · EducationBENTLEY UNIVERSITYNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $9,500 · EducationNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITYTrustees of Tufts College — $7,000 · EducationENDICOTT COLLEGE — $6,000 · EducationSUFFOLK UNIVERSITY — $5,500 · EducationCURRY COLLEGE — $5,500 · EducationSIMMONS UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · Education+24 more — $67,250 · Education+24 moreUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS — $25,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTSUMASS AMHERST — $23,500 · OtherUMASS AMHERSTSALEM STATE UNIVERSITY — $21,000 · OtherSALEM STATE UNIVERSITYUMASS LOWELL — $16,000 · OtherUMASS LOWELLUNIVERSITY OF MAINE FARMINGTON — $6,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · OtherBRIDGEWATER STATE UNIVERSITY — $4,500 · Other+10 more — $27,500 · Other+10 more
Education$149,750Other$128,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPROVIDENCE COLLEGE — $15,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE — $15,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBENTLEY UNIVERSITY — $13,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY — $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetENDICOTT COLLEGE — $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSUFFOLK UNIVERSITY — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCURRY COLLEGE — $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSIMMONS UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRANDEIS UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRivier University — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of New England — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBucknell University — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMMANUEL COLLEGE — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSUMPTION UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tampa Incorporated — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYLOR UNIVERSITY — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSYRACUSE UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SISTERS OF SAINT ANN INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT MICHAEL'S COLLEGE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMERRIMACK COLLEGE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBABSON COLLEGE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEMERSON COLLEGE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEmory University — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBRYN MAWR COLLEGE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern New Hampshire University — $1,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREGIS COLLEGE — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Clinton G Mills TuwFidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
Clinton G Mills TuwTX13.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Clinton G Mills Tuw · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Clinton G Mills Tui funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College — 11% of income from government
  • Brandeis University — 8% of income from government
  • Northeastern University — 4% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College — 2% of income from government
  • Merrimack College — 2% of income from government
  • The Sisters of Saint Ann Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Regis College — 1% of income from government
  • Saint Michael's College — 1% of income from government
  • Suffolk University — 1% of income from government
  • Assumption University — 1% of income from government
  • Curry College — 0% of income from government
  • Simmons University — 0% of income from government
  • Babson College — 0% of income from government
  • Endicott College — 0% of income from government
  • Emerson College — 0% of income from government
  • The University of Tampa Incorporated — 0% of income from government
  • Emmanuel College — 0% of income from government
  • Bentley University — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home