Skip to content

Massachusetts · Private foundation

Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$584k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
32
Grants FY2025
10
Organizations funded FY2024
90%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 10
FY2023 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
10
Total assets, FY2025
$1.8M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 90% of the organizations Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 88% of its grant dollars.

The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving32$584k84%
FY202410$161k90%
FY20235$30kn/a
94% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Religion$218kHuman Services$115kEducation$112kYouth Development$101kCommunity Improvement$100kEnvironment$55kAnimals$11kArts & Culture$10kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2023 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
The Sola Foundation$100,0001n/a
The Worcester Guardian Inc$100,0001n/a
Chabad Lubavitch of the North Shore$100,0002n/a
Worcester Regional Strategic Opportunities Foundation$100,00021%
Quinsigamond Community College Foundation Inc$100,00017%
Chabad of Beverly-Salem Inc$63,6002n/a
Regional Environmental Council Inc$50,00021%
Lappin Foundation$28,50021%
Temple Ner Tamid$16,2662n/a
The Grey Muzzle Organization$5,00010%
Show all 28 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 13 recipients with no EIN on record ($60k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWorcester Regional Strategic Opportunities Foundation: $100,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetQuinsigamond Community College Foundation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetRegional Environmental Council Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetLappin Foundation: $28,500 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetThe Grey Muzzle Organization: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSummit Agency Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetArthritis Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMorgans Message Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Indian College Fund: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Civil Liberties Union Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCovenant House: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRosie's Place Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeverly Bootstraps Community Services I: $1,830 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSweet Paws Rescue Inc: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGreater Worcester Land Trust: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFriends of the Children - Boston Inc: $515 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSt Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA14.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc

How much does Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc give?
Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc reported 32 grants totaling $584,261 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 10 organizations a year over FY2023 to FY2024.
What does Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2023 to FY2025, its largest causes are Religion (28%), Human Services (15%), Education (14%).
Who are Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2023 to FY2025: The Sola Foundation ($100k), The Worcester Guardian Inc ($100k), Chabad Lubavitch of the North Shore ($100k).
Does Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 90% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Eastern Bank Foundation, Boston Foundation Inc, Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc.
Where is Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc based?
Cliff and Susan Rucker Charitable Foundation Inc is based in MA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cliff and Susan Rucker’s filings →

More from the funding graph